It seems the current committee is operating exactly as documented.
Well, we are actually gathering more feedback compared to what the documentation seems to says.
We gathered feedback before and during the creation of our proposal.
We are going to gather other feedback after the proposal will be given to the public for listen to their thoughts/ideas/comments etc.
Only after that, we are going to approve the proposal (probably modified with community input) and let the stakeholders do their job with the voting process.
This is exactly where we differ. IMO it's *not* the role of committee members to do what you described.
You are not supposed to "gather feedback" because you are not representing anybody's interests.
You are not supposed to do any "hard work". If hard work was needed for this position, it would have been a paid position.
You are not supposed to be "approachable" as Bunker said in the last mumble. If being approachable is a valuable quality for a committee member, that would mean s/he has access to some sort of power or resources which ordinary shareholder does not have. And this is clearly not the case. There should be nothing I should need to ask Bunker or you. I should not need to ask for any of your attention, either. When I have discussions on the forum, I don't expect anybody to be approachable.
IMO, the only thing you are supposed to do (for free) is this: have public discussions and publicly differ in your opinions. That's the whole point.
Not work together (as some kind of governmental body representing the shareholders' interests), but quite the opposite: discuss and publicly defend your views with solid arguments, so that the shareholders can see who is making sense and who is not. So basically do what everybody does here on this forum. Discuss. For free.
The only difference between me and you is that you have been given (by the shareholders) access to some special multi-sig account.
Otherwise we are equal and there is no reason I can think of, that entitles you to work on the details of the new holistic fee schedule but not e.g. luckybit, if he wanted to.
You are only committee members, not some sort of special commission, whose purpose is to arrive at a solution to a problem.
This is what pc wants you to be and I strongly disagree with him.
And this is where the pathology begins: when shareholders are misled to feel grateful for your "hard work". Their gratefulness gives you power over them.
You are not supposed to have any power - you are only supposed to have opinions, each of you
individually, not collective as a group.