I see the people here arguing with Stan are NOT asking for more DVS.
The messages they are trying to deliver are:
1. PTS has been 'dead' since 11.05. This is the only snapshot date for PTS after then regarding the 'official' DACs like DevShares.
2. Bytemaster said in one post that DevShares would respect 11.05 snapshot for PTS.
3. Message 2 was widely spreaded around both English and Chinese community.
4. Actually Stan/developers/3I (I don't know whom I should put here ) failed to follow message 2.
5. Stan didn't want to admit the fault and tried to defend himself by a reason which is not so reasonable and surely not accepted by them.
In a word, they hate someone always dance around the questions.
I, for one, think what they are trying to fight for is reasonable.
I don't care even if the sharedrop for DevShares is a fault.
I just want to know if PTS is still support by this community or not
What do you mean support? and how do you define community? All these arguments have these problems. Sooo vague, but I am not sure how it can be any other way.
I3 is not going to be sharedropping on PTS going forward. Does this really seem to be in question to you guys? What support is ok and isn't?
If a developer asks a question who sharedropped to PTS in the forums, should anyone involved with I3 ignore the question? If so, then I guess the developer should just go all crypto and hide their identity? Should there be no PTS community forum on bitsharestalk?
edit - On a lighter note, I plan on killing this argument just by sheer will of arguing. It won't be a first for me.