Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mdj

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13
91
Are there plans to increase liquidity for Bitassets on the internal exchange?

92
General Discussion / Instant BitAsset profit opportunities?
« on: March 28, 2015, 03:04:52 pm »
People currently buying Silver way above feed price. Anybody could short above feed price and instantly gain from feed -> bid?
I'm really surprised by the lack of liquidity on these assets!


93
General Discussion / Re: Blockchain scalability
« on: March 27, 2015, 01:10:36 pm »
We have a proof-of-concept implementation of bitshares that can reindex 2 million blocks, 1 million accounts, and each block containing 1 transfer  in just 8 seconds while using less than 1 GB of ram.   

I would say that while the current release software is "slow" because it is built on LevelDB, that scalability is not going to be a problem.  You can see the new database code here:  https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/tree/develop/libraries/db

Upgrading BitShares to use this code is a challenging task, but it is certainly possible.

That's really impressive! :O

94
Please please please stay away from MLM it would be incredibly damaging. Enough of this "get rich quick", focus on the product and the customers will come...

But yes I am all for single level referral schemes, that would be great.
We need to grow our user base with people who actually understand the product and want to use it, not with people who have no idea what it is but just want to try and sell it in some MLM.

95
This referal program would make it so easy to earn money in a way so different from the original idea of BitShares, that its ponziness would defeat BitShares' original purpose. Yes, it would probably bring many new people to the system. But what kind of people? People, who will suddenly realize how good BitShares are, or people who just want to get rich on the referal program?

From wikipedia:
Quote
Ponzi schemes occasionally begin as legitimate businesses, until the business fails to achieve the returns expected. The business becomes a Ponzi scheme if it then continues under fraudulent terms. Whatever the initial situation, the perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to sustain the scheme.

I would prefer to stick to the original values we wanted to promote, not the "get rich fast" values. Once the original ideas get implemented, we will earn profit from the right thing instead of this obscure mechanism.

Ever used Venmo?  When they started if I signed up via my friend's link, then my friend got $5.  Then the app asked me to send a link to all my friends.  Every friend of mine that signed up via my link earned me $5.  The app has so much utility now because all my friends are signed up and we can send each other money instantly. 

An MLM program should work the same way for bitshares except that bitshares will not only grab the global peer to peer payments network effect for bitusd, it will also encourage merchant adoption, and employer to employee payments, which an app like Venmo will never be able to do. 

My point being ... Venmo never seemed like a pyramid scheme because the app is solid gold in terms of utility.  BitUSD will eventually be solid gold in terms of utility, so any users brought in by a referral/rewards/MLM program would likely use the app IMO.

But was that Venmo paying you or did the users signing up have to pay $x too?

96
This referal program would make it so easy to earn money in a way so different from the original idea of BitShares, that its ponziness would defeat BitShares' original purpose. Yes, it would probably bring many new people to the system. But what kind of people? People, who will suddenly realize how good BitShares are, or people who just want to get rich on the referal program?

From wikipedia:
Quote
Ponzi schemes occasionally begin as legitimate businesses, until the business fails to achieve the returns expected. The business becomes a Ponzi scheme if it then continues under fraudulent terms. Whatever the initial situation, the perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to sustain the scheme.

I would prefer to stick to the original values we wanted to promote, not the "get rich fast" values. Once the original ideas get implemented, we will earn profit from the right thing instead of this obscure mechanism.

 +5%

I agree.  I was hoping people would come to BitShares because their own search for integrity led them here.  The principals on which BitShares has been built is of vital importance.   Then the other reason would be the incredible utility of BitShares which simply makes it the market choice....this point doesn't feel so far away.

97
General Discussion / Re: MineBitShares - now listed on PoolPicker.eu
« on: March 26, 2015, 07:51:08 pm »
So I'm voting for the www.minebitshares-com delegate which I believe contributes to pool subsidizing?
What is minebitshares-reloaded for?

Check out the new delegate proposal:  MineBitShares Reloaded - 100% Delegate Proposal (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14887.0)

tl;dr is

To support the 0% fee, we need a single 100% delegate and retire the 2 x 3% older delegates.
Note: the delegates today do not support subsidising the pool at all.

Cool I'll update my votes :)

Do you intend to subsidize to ensure minebitshares is always the cheapest? I'm sure you could get a second paid delegate to do that tbh as it would be huge visibility for Bitshares

98
I want to bring this thread back up, this would be super useful for seeing what delegates are up to, they could even broadcast a status. There needs to be more transparancy from the delegates on what they are working on, what that specific delegate is for etc. This could of course also be validated against their applicable forum handle to take the discussions off of the blockchain...

99
General Discussion / Re: MineBitShares - now listed on PoolPicker.eu
« on: March 26, 2015, 04:35:26 pm »
So I'm voting for the www.minebitshares-com delegate which I believe contributes to pool subsidizing?
What is minebitshares-reloaded for?

100
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: NOTE Price discussion
« on: March 26, 2015, 04:31:42 pm »
i cant find in bitshares exchange, only see bitNotes and not show chart or nothing.

how total notes are?

not going to be day 28 release of notes?

search for Note:BTS

101
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Claiming Notes questions
« on: March 26, 2015, 09:42:03 am »
Man do I feel stupid. Thanks to the Notes distro (and it being off by an amount identical to an AGS donation made long ago), I discovered I hadn't imported one of my AGS donation keys yet.

I can't wait to see how many BTS I have from it... that I never missed before tonight (doh!).

Haha nice it must feel like Christmas for you!

102
the lightwallet currently only has send and receive functionality

103
General Discussion / Re: A suggestion
« on: March 25, 2015, 10:26:25 pm »
sent - I agree, captcha would suffice :)

104
General Discussion / Re: Current State of Light Wallet(s)
« on: March 25, 2015, 09:55:34 pm »
There's project moonstone which is reworking the wallets, the light wallet currently supports sending and receiving but is functional. You could also use the web wallet beta: wallet.bitshares.org (I believe) you only decrypt private keys client side.

105
General Discussion / Re: Selling BTS
« on: March 25, 2015, 07:56:16 pm »
If you need fiat I'd use a gateway to get btc then sell it on local bitcoins or something. Otherwise if you are just reducing your BTS exposure then get some bitusd

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13