Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - oldman

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ... 38
241
General Discussion / Re: Suggested Press Release regarding the merger
« on: October 21, 2014, 09:14:50 pm »
Any press release should not be circulated until BTS is live.

Media push coinciding with coinmarketcap switchover would be ideal.

242
Step 4: Moon
Objections?
"Mars or even Pluto" [citation:bytemaster]

Fixed:

Step 1: BTS

Step 2: Client

Step 3: Market

Step 4: Moon

Step 5: Mars

Step 6: Pluto

Objections?

243
I would say the merger to BTS should wrap up right around the time the first marketing push begins.

244
Step 1: BTS

Step 2: Client

Step 3: Market

Step 4: Moon

Objections?

No objections, but implementation?  (How the heck do we do it?)

BM & Friends.

245
General Discussion / Re: Cannabiscoin pegging 1 gram to 1 coin
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:48:44 pm »
Can someone explain why this community would want to voluntarily associate with controlled/illegal substances?

246
Long time AGS, PTS, and BTSX holder here as well.  The merger is a great idea and BitShares will be much stronger for it.  Let's make it happen so the devs can focus on kicking more ass.

 +5%

247
That said, IMO if indeed a major restructuring is necessary, then the time is now before the DAC gets too big. I remember discussions a while back about how the first implementation of bitshares may have to be redone.  So this is fine with me as long as distributed consensus is maintained and the majority of shareholders are required to approve the decisions.

Yep.

248
Step 1: BTS

Step 2: Client

Step 3: Market

Step 4: Moon

Objections?

249
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:38:46 pm »
we discussed the "merged-mining" proposal in the hangout yesterday .. and IMHO would should go the other way round and focus all power in one blockchain .. and gather speed ...

once the market can stand on it's own .. the blockchain features can be "spinned off" the main business and be run on a separated chain using the same assets/delegates .. but different chain/feature set ..
Xeroc can you explain to me why a couple weeks ago the company line was that some secret marketing plus a bitUSD debit card was poised to rocket BTSX above all our wildest expectations, but now all of a sudden the chains need to be consolidated in order to "stand on it's own"?

Were they wrong before or is it bullshit now?

I don't mean to sound combative, I respect you, your opinion and all you've done for this venture thus far.  It is a genuine question.

Thanks buddy.

I hear you. The lack of marketing transparency is frustrating. The lack of any marketing effort that shareholders can see is frustrating. Constantly changing plans at a whim is frustrating. Naive as it may be, I'm holding onto hope this is a step in the direction of simplicity, organization and focus. :-\

The flip side of the lack of marketing to-date... imagine trying to streamline with a broader user base.

If the devs tried to go to BTS post-market push it would have been a nightmare.

Silver linings and all that.

250
Long-time PTS holder here (AGS too).

The sooner the devs merge AGS/PTS into BTS the better.

251
General Discussion / Re: Cannabiscoin pegging 1 gram to 1 coin
« on: October 20, 2014, 04:45:35 pm »
I would strongly advise all delegates not to support any assets related to controlled or illegal substances - and I will remove my vote from those that do.

The absolute last thing Bitshares needs is a big news story on bitMja/bitCcn/bitCrk etc.

252
Do it, merge all into BitsharesX.  +5% All funding should go into 1 DAC, and that funding can be distributed according to each DAC's need, so if someone doesn't know where to fund, they just fund the main DAC.

 +5%

The devs have my full support to implement the BTS merger, and the sooner the better.

The DAC fragmentation/naming etc was a major stumbling block for marketing and investment.

Now folks can just buy BTS to invest in BTC 2.0.

Simple, clean and easy.

253
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 20, 2014, 04:15:59 am »
These are the kind of changes you don't make after a launch. It's way too much change for the market to handle and it's not the kind of change anyone wants. The market is speaking.

In my opinion if you want unity then network the DACs using technical means. Don't change the names, don't change the internal structures or centralize it. Allow all DACs to pay a fee to join this network of DACs and use that network as a sort of support network for all the DACs.

It is a company. 
It is competing in a ruthless Darwinian evolutionary environment. 
It must continuously adapt or die. 
Arguments against change are arguments against adapting. 
The dinosaurs already tried that.

:)
   +5% for wise Stan

Folks need to understand BTS is not a currency with a fixed supply like BTC.

254
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 20, 2014, 04:14:02 am »
BTSX is rallying now.  That panic dump was the bottom of this downtrend.  Buy all you can now, imo.

People are funny.

Devs run out a proposal that revolutionizes a revolutionary technology.

People panic sell.

Community realizes devs are awesome.

People panic buy.

255
General Discussion / Re: What is going on??
« on: October 19, 2014, 06:03:56 pm »
Yep, buying.

A successful streamline to BTS massively increases the value and marketability of the technology.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ... 38