151
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Business development delegate
« on: January 31, 2015, 07:22:59 pm »You've got my vote!Current rank 214 guys Keep those shares voting
http://bitsharesblocks.com/delegates/delegate?name=delegate.verbaltech
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You've got my vote!Current rank 214 guys Keep those shares voting
You'll soon have my vote!
Link for the lazy: delegate.verbaltechMore than just promoting the protocol, a hardware solution may be the best answer to their need to secure stake and promote voting.
Could you elaborate on this? I believe secure/specialized hardware (physical wallet?) may be crucial for long-term adoption. Interested to hear more!
Do you think that you will be contacting bullion dealers who already accept bitcoin (through BitPay)? ie, amagimetals.com and silvergoldbull.com both of whom are already doing that and from whom I have bought silver coins for bitcoin.
If you consider it to be a high priority that they be contacted about accepting bitSILVER, bitGOLD and bitUSD, then you get my immediate vote.
You'll soon have my vote!
Link for the lazy: delegate.verbaltechMore than just promoting the protocol, a hardware solution may be the best answer to their need to secure stake and promote voting.
Could you elaborate on this? I believe secure/specialized hardware (physical wallet?) may be crucial for long-term adoption. Interested to hear more!
My reference was to the very recent explosion of ponzi 'gambling' going on in BTC. Dozens popped up in the last month after one giant one made off with thousands in BTC. Sure there is the standard gambling.
I'm pretty sure that the suggestion was to implement something liek SatoshiDice in Bitshares, not to implement Cryptodouble.com in Bitshares.
It is a done deal. I also believe the words "coming weeks" not months were used so lets see if we can keep that time table.Who was it on the mumble a few weeks ago that said shapeshift integration was a "done deal"??Just a quick update but the launch date is looking like monday 1/26.LOL.
The fact is,Nope...
Bytemaster, can you please explain why this was implemented like this?
One thing I could do is trigger an "immediate" margin call by raising the call price to the current feed price. This would immediately cover your full order and I could even have it bypass the 5% fee in this case.
This is a good point.First BTC then fiat once critical mass is reached.
A better option is to pitch them BTC/bitasset pairs as a way to allow their clients to hedge their bitcoin holdings without going into fiat. We can organize market making and give people low spreads and thus easy access.
Is BTC/bitasset or fiat/bitasset better?
Sent from my Timex Sinclair
Hitting "cover" should execute the exact same process as a margin call. It should use the bts locked up in collateral to buy the bitUSD back. It should buy at the price feed.
No exchange makes you buy back short positions with money that was not locked up in the original collateral.
Thanks for the suggestions guys. There's actually loads of options to choose, all of which are great for us. Ive written my email and sent that great TV episode as well as http://bitsharesblocks.com/assets/market which shows how much buzzing activity there is. Fingers crossed.