91
General Discussion / Re: please release a emergency version to protect expired cover order
« on: March 15, 2015, 01:45:22 pm »
How can someone push the price to 200 BTS/BitUSD ? 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
92
General Discussion / Re: The BitShares Online Web Wallet is ready...
« on: March 13, 2015, 09:55:26 am »LOL...Damn is a lot kinder than the f word...
Damn, I used a name I really really like so work extra hard on this.
OK, good to know. I pick up those accounts registered before this release.
Me too
93
General Discussion / Re: cryptosigma debit card
« on: March 12, 2015, 09:01:40 am »Are you talking about BitPlastic.com? Because last I heard the fees are 5% exchange rate.
BitPlastic.com uses Mastercard and cryptosigma.com will provide Visa card. Visa is superior, and is more widely accepted, imho. But CryptoSigma haven't launched yet. Hopefully the fee will not be that high.
94
General Discussion / Re: cryptosigma debit card
« on: March 11, 2015, 05:05:05 pm »
Looking forward to this. CryptoSigma would greatly benefit from using market pegged assets like BitUSD.
95
Technical Support / Re: Help backing up my wallet
« on: March 11, 2015, 04:41:19 pm »For future reference in case something happened and I wanted to access that wallet, I just download the Bitshares client & then i'd be able to boot the wallet from that file?
Assuming you remember the wallet password.
96
General Discussion / Re: Development seems to be suspended
« on: March 11, 2015, 01:18:17 pm »It's like people don't even realise that the web wallet is out, and that it works perfectly!
wallet.bitshares.org!
wallet.bitshares.org does not have market functionality, does not integrate any bridges or gateways, and you cannot login into your wallet from other computers. currently wallet.bitshares.org is pretty useless. no offense. obviously its a huge milestone, but we certainly would have expected it several weeks if not months ago.
What do you mean? I have successfully logged in to web wallet using my phone. The wallet was created using Windows on PC. I haven't tested it in practice, but with metaexchange i could buy anything using just my phone with BitUSD where BTC is accepted. The only issue is that all web wallets in general are less secure. It isn't useless.
97
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: March 10, 2015, 07:43:34 pm »
Getting this error "Unable to connect to unspecified(0) No connection could be made because target machine actively refused it" with 1.0 beta 3
98
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 0.6.2 Feedback
« on: March 10, 2015, 07:36:32 pm »
Sometimes when i click on BitUSD:BTS featured market it opens BitSILVER:BTS instead. (Windows 7 64 bit)
99
General Discussion / Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
« on: March 09, 2015, 11:02:33 pm »But the main part that slows sync is HDD not CPU. The software could also use more RAM that is left unused.
Sorry it already uses too much RAM lol
Well, for me when syncing less than 100 hours left, it takes only 1GB of RAM(2GB unused), but uses HDD heavily.
100
General Discussion / Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
« on: March 09, 2015, 09:44:47 pm »
But the main part that slows sync is HDD not CPU. The software could also use more RAM that is left unused.
101
General Discussion / Re: 30 million bitshares...
« on: March 04, 2015, 08:26:10 pm »
Just wait for the next big "marketing push" 
102
General Discussion / Re: Bter hacked. 720BTC bounty. CNY, USD, NXT assets withdrawal. To rebuild backend
« on: March 03, 2015, 11:42:43 pm »It sees they might have sold the site, and the new owners ("their partners") have much more sense and are now trying to maximize bter's value.
This explains sudden disappearance of bytemaster and co.
104
General Discussion / Re: ripple rally
« on: March 03, 2015, 03:16:30 pm »In any case i predict a rise to 880-920m and then a crash to 300m in a two months timeline
I'm curious about other people's predictions...
nice
105
General Discussion / Re: Bytemaster and Mumble - A Proposed Solution
« on: March 02, 2015, 11:54:53 pm »
Look where we are after one year. From decentralized system with TaPOS - to centralized DPOS, then price feed enforcement, then merger massacre and dilution, now a censorship and insider trading. Not to mention main wallet resource hog and lack of progress(Vote DAC, anyone?), and super failure with marketing push. WTF, can't say i'm happy where things are going towards.
