Our CFO, Charles Evans, just published an article in LetsTalkBitcoin that I think is fantastic!
http://letstalkbitcoin.com/a-bitrose-by-any-other-name/#.Uxpd9-ddXzR (http://letstalkbitcoin.com/a-bitrose-by-any-other-name/#.Uxpd9-ddXzR)
In addition to giving some helpful insights about bitAssets, he also addresses another vitally important issue that keeps coming up around here:
We speak in similes, metaphors, and analogies.
Thus, we often get accused of violating this or that regulatory domain,
just because we used a metaphor from its lexicon to help explain a new concept.
Words have meanings, but sometimes the same word can have opposite meanings.
I plan to point to this article often.
Every time some outraged legal-beagle shouts in an accusatory tone,
"Yer usin' coconuts!"
Which then results in a vigorous irrelevant argument worthy of Monty Python:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XPnIUtcANg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XPnIUtcANg)
(http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/236x/42/d3/93/42d39365af4e74df4b1ff18406a17144.jpg)
This, of course, was exactly the whole point of my original tounge-in-cheek fable:
Innocence is No Excuse. http://invictus-innovations.com/innocence-is-no-excuse/ (http://invictus-innovations.com/innocence-is-no-excuse/)
(http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/42/83/0b/42830bc2322a183a12ed0ac786e6ace1.jpg)
Enjoy. :)