46
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 重塑keyid keyhotee bitshares
« on: January 31, 2020, 04:24:40 pm »
keyhotee ID:百度
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
不吹牛逼的币最终就是只有死。默默无闻,无人问津,无人知晓,最终死亡。所以买币一定要买吹牛逼的大炮币。
像 一向以吹牛皮出名的 BSV 和 HC (红烧肉)这种,而连多次判死亡的ETC这种都会暴涨。
要想涨,就得想尽一切办法吹牛皮,然后以拉涨盘面的方式来配合,才能把市值做起来,而不是让它自生自灭,因为它不是BTC。
像BTS这种5年时间过去了,反而开 倒车的币,真是一 个极度失望的币种,排名从第三 名市值跌到百名开名了,已经无名无份了。没有人愿意购买和持有 投资这种币的。
dpos最大的毒瘤,只能存平台的bts,eos就等于完蛋!没有btc的价值增长支撑点。显然也没有当时宣传的各种应用,偏离大家期望了。bts所谓的银行功能,实际只有是做空再空,没有银行应该有的增值能力,放进去只有空。 这也是bts,eos需要改的,或者需要重塑https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=31900.0相比交易大赛,这个不更容易让alt这样的成为最大受益者吗?还有CEX。锁仓一年起?这样至少比让他压盘或者砸盘好。再说,锁仓的BTS是没有票权的,alt不见得会参与。
那就会跟EOS一样,最后各大CEX成为最大受益者。
他们作为保存别人BTS的机构,恰好不纠结BTS的价格,也不关心票权。
ZB这样的,拿锁仓得来的奖励再去放款收息。。。
Quantum-resistant signature schemes exist, and are probably not too difficult to implement, but they generally have much bigger signatures and/or keys than ECC. This would seriously affect TX/s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography#Comparison
There are ways to quantum proof a blockchain. It would take a rebuild of the blockchain and the encryption protocol. So one needs to take a step back and look at the underlying encryption. Once that is fixed. One can move on to making new chains. BTS faces a lot of challenges. Quantum is not going to be the thing that sinks BTS.
There are multiple ways to attack a problem. In World War Two, lots of people looked at "Who had the best tank." And the best tank was defined as "the biggest gun, the thickest armour, and the best speed." Generally, the germans did. However, the war was won by who had the biggest economic production, who had the fuel, who had the most people, who had the economic power and who could deliver the sweeping blow. Good tanks, didn't do any good, if you couldn't get them to site. (this is why Germany didn't invade England, they didn't have a way to get tanks across the english channel.) And the Russians had pure mass production of a good tank, and lots of people to get into them. And then there was the whole strategy thing. (Don't fight two super powers.)
So the black swan incident for BTS has been global settlements. It wasn't really intended to happen. BTC's problem is more than one of security. It needs usability, marketing and more. It is not always the big things that kill a crypto currencies. sometimes it is all the little things.
What will be Black swan incident for bts and btc https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=31945.new#new
There is no need to worry about Quantum computer If it running follow traditional method for cracking encryption.
But How can you make sure it will be?
That will be disaster if we use 64 Quantum bit Quantum computer with ability of 8 bit per 1 Quantum bit under the situation that Quantum computer does not follow all encryption should test one by one. The may just test if bit 1 is righ ,bit 2 is right, bit is 3 right . .. bit 512 is right, ok, One 64 Quantum bit Quantum computer just need one running cycle is solving the encryption. So it is easy cracking the encryption.
So is there any solution avoid such teach will be used in traditional computer or cpu system avoid these thing happens? If There is no solution. Bts and btc could be cracked in no more than 1024 computer running cycles. So it will not be safer for these systems. More then 1E51 computer running times for avoid cracking encryption is just a ideal dreams. ??