0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
For my part, I will now directly buy BTS with EUR rather than EUR-BTC-BTS. And I will tell my eurofriends to do the same.
Just for laughs: how about a little NXT vs BTS trading war on CCEDK ?
Quote from: ccedk on July 17, 2015, 05:51:39 pmQuote from: mdj on July 17, 2015, 04:07:38 pmFirst sentence has typo:QuoteWith the global economy having spent over US$500 billion spent last year on fees for remittances (i.e. Double spentty Well, I would say journalist is not that wrong here, it says spent twice, but you have to get the meaning here, first it is the global economy having spent the amount, and then comes what it has been spent on, you understand?hmm i still think it'd read much better with one spent. I get what you're saying and in that scenario it's just missing a coma and it'd read well then ie:With the global economy having spent over US$500 billion, spent last year on fees for...Great article though - nice work CCEDK!
Quote from: mdj on July 17, 2015, 04:07:38 pmFirst sentence has typo:QuoteWith the global economy having spent over US$500 billion spent last year on fees for remittances (i.e. Double spentty Well, I would say journalist is not that wrong here, it says spent twice, but you have to get the meaning here, first it is the global economy having spent the amount, and then comes what it has been spent on, you understand?
First sentence has typo:QuoteWith the global economy having spent over US$500 billion spent last year on fees for remittances (i.e. Double spent
With the global economy having spent over US$500 billion spent last year on fees for remittances (i.e.
Quote from: mdj on July 17, 2015, 04:07:38 pmFirst sentence has typo:QuoteWith the global economy having spent over US$500 billion spent last year on fees for remittances (i.e. Double spentWell, I would say journalist is not that wrong here, it says spent twice, but you have to get the meaning here, first it is the global economy having spent the amount, and then comes what it has been spent on, you understand?
I don't know what route ccedk will go .. but in the end you can haveccedk.doge, ccedk.dash, ccedk.* and so on as IOUs and let people trade cced.btc : bitUSD directly in the DEX not having any of your funds in CCEDK (except maybe for the IOU, but that's the same thing as with classical centralized exchanges) ..
sorry i'm having a tough time conceptualizing this...ccedk is currently a centralized exchange with customer accounts and funds. this includes fiat and a wide variety of crypto. the bitshares blockchain has nothing to do with any of this other infrastructure, but you're saying that for Bitshares network stuff, like BTS, bitUSD, bitEUR, etc. ccedk will migrate all client funds to our blockchain and keep no keys on their system? even if so, the non-Bitshares stuff on ccedk is still vulnerable to hacking or otherwise losing keys or funds.what happens when clients sell BTS for BTC on ccedk? the funds migrate over to their ccedk hosted account from our blockchain? does ccedk integration into 2.0 mean they'll have direct access to our wallets? say i place a trade for BTS to bitUSD via ccedk (not sure why i would do that vs. directly on the DAX?), does that mean ccedk will access the BTS in my wallet, execute the trade on my behalf, and then deposit the bitUSD back into my wallet? 2.0 integration sounds awesome, just not sure i fully understand the details, or if the details are being misconstrued too optimistically in the community?
Quote from: Chuckone on July 17, 2015, 01:21:07 pmQuote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 17, 2015, 01:15:35 pmQuote from: xeroc on July 17, 2015, 06:31:59 amQuote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 16, 2015, 03:24:53 pmawesome! i'd like to learn more about ccedk is being implemented. for instance, how is this possible?“You won’t have to worry about our exchange being hacked or whether it is honest or solvent.”i thought the exchange still hosts customer accounts and holds funds? ha .. seems you haven't read through all the technology in bitshares2.0:https://bitshares.org/technology/recurring-and-scheduled-payments/This allows you to give permission to someone else (on-chain) to withdraw up to a predefined amount of funds (in a certain asset) in a given period of time.You can pretty much compare this feature with a debit card that has a daily/monthly limit!!In the end, the exchange does not need to hold ANY of your funds .. it's basically just "translating" credit cards commands into bitshares network commands ..This IS a killer feature!very cool, but i'm not sure that's the basis for ccedk, is it? they still operate an exchange and host funded client accounts on their servers. that's what i meant by the security issue. are they planning to migrate away from that structure somehow by plugging into 2.0? i thought 2.0 integration just enabled access to our DAX.Their trading engine will be the Bitshares blockchain on the backend. So they won't hold any of their client's keys, eliminating the risk of being hacked and losing client's funds.sorry i'm having a tough time conceptualizing this...ccedk is currently a centralized exchange with customer accounts and funds. this includes fiat and a wide variety of crypto. the bitshares blockchain has nothing to do with any of this other infrastructure, but you're saying that for Bitshares network stuff, like BTS, bitUSD, bitEUR, etc. ccedk will migrate all client funds to our blockchain and keep no keys on their system? even if so, the non-Bitshares stuff on ccedk is still vulnerable to hacking or otherwise losing keys or funds.what happens when clients sell BTS for BTC on ccedk? the funds migrate over to their ccedk hosted account from our blockchain? does ccedk integration into 2.0 mean they'll have direct access to our wallets? say i place a trade for BTS to bitUSD via ccedk (not sure why i would do that vs. directly on the DAX?), does that mean ccedk will access the BTS in my wallet, execute the trade on my behalf, and then deposit the bitUSD back into my wallet? 2.0 integration sounds awesome, just not sure i fully understand the details, or if the details are being misconstrued too optimistically in the community?
Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 17, 2015, 01:15:35 pmQuote from: xeroc on July 17, 2015, 06:31:59 amQuote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 16, 2015, 03:24:53 pmawesome! i'd like to learn more about ccedk is being implemented. for instance, how is this possible?“You won’t have to worry about our exchange being hacked or whether it is honest or solvent.”i thought the exchange still hosts customer accounts and holds funds? ha .. seems you haven't read through all the technology in bitshares2.0:https://bitshares.org/technology/recurring-and-scheduled-payments/This allows you to give permission to someone else (on-chain) to withdraw up to a predefined amount of funds (in a certain asset) in a given period of time.You can pretty much compare this feature with a debit card that has a daily/monthly limit!!In the end, the exchange does not need to hold ANY of your funds .. it's basically just "translating" credit cards commands into bitshares network commands ..This IS a killer feature!very cool, but i'm not sure that's the basis for ccedk, is it? they still operate an exchange and host funded client accounts on their servers. that's what i meant by the security issue. are they planning to migrate away from that structure somehow by plugging into 2.0? i thought 2.0 integration just enabled access to our DAX.Their trading engine will be the Bitshares blockchain on the backend. So they won't hold any of their client's keys, eliminating the risk of being hacked and losing client's funds.
Quote from: xeroc on July 17, 2015, 06:31:59 amQuote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 16, 2015, 03:24:53 pmawesome! i'd like to learn more about ccedk is being implemented. for instance, how is this possible?“You won’t have to worry about our exchange being hacked or whether it is honest or solvent.”i thought the exchange still hosts customer accounts and holds funds? ha .. seems you haven't read through all the technology in bitshares2.0:https://bitshares.org/technology/recurring-and-scheduled-payments/This allows you to give permission to someone else (on-chain) to withdraw up to a predefined amount of funds (in a certain asset) in a given period of time.You can pretty much compare this feature with a debit card that has a daily/monthly limit!!In the end, the exchange does not need to hold ANY of your funds .. it's basically just "translating" credit cards commands into bitshares network commands ..This IS a killer feature!very cool, but i'm not sure that's the basis for ccedk, is it? they still operate an exchange and host funded client accounts on their servers. that's what i meant by the security issue. are they planning to migrate away from that structure somehow by plugging into 2.0? i thought 2.0 integration just enabled access to our DAX.
Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 16, 2015, 03:24:53 pmawesome! i'd like to learn more about ccedk is being implemented. for instance, how is this possible?“You won’t have to worry about our exchange being hacked or whether it is honest or solvent.”i thought the exchange still hosts customer accounts and holds funds? ha .. seems you haven't read through all the technology in bitshares2.0:https://bitshares.org/technology/recurring-and-scheduled-payments/This allows you to give permission to someone else (on-chain) to withdraw up to a predefined amount of funds (in a certain asset) in a given period of time.You can pretty much compare this feature with a debit card that has a daily/monthly limit!!In the end, the exchange does not need to hold ANY of your funds .. it's basically just "translating" credit cards commands into bitshares network commands ..This IS a killer feature!
awesome! i'd like to learn more about ccedk is being implemented. for instance, how is this possible?“You won’t have to worry about our exchange being hacked or whether it is honest or solvent.”i thought the exchange still hosts customer accounts and holds funds?
Published on Forbes at 10.14am New York(EDT). http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2015/07/16/is-the-nanocard-bitcoins-killer-app-can-it-transform-the-global-remittance-market/
So lets just wait with great anticipation on the Forbes article and enjoy that Bitshares is having a good mentioning in there togther with SmartCoins and Cryptonomex. It is free publicity and will hopefully bring some more members to the community in the same time.
Ronny,I am going to try to help you out here. You seem like a sincere guy and I think good things lie ahead for CCEDK. I would imagine some think like me so here you go.... I don't use centralized exchanges unless I absolutely have to. I am looking forward to using your service in 2.0 though! I think it's going to be great. I would like to point out a couple of things. Your post kind of seems threatening in a veiled way (probably unintentional). That's not a good way to be a part of a community.So far what you have done is said that centralized exchanges aren't safe and BTS 2.0 is the way to solve that. I agree. However, now it seems you are saying "go ahead and use my centralized exchange since I have spoken a lot of words about my intentions and about how great Bitshares is so I should be rewarded with increased liquidity". So far these are just words. I think it's possible that you do deserve a reward but for me personally that will come once BTS 2.0 is ready and you have followed through on your promise to be the first to move your platform to it and proved your competence.I will tell you that if I need to move funds before all of this happens I will use your exchange but right now I view all centralized exchanges as a necessary evil. I do look forward to a great partnership between BTS and CCEDK.Please don't be discouraged by my post. I am trying to help you craft your message. Maybe no one else shares my feelings here but I doubt it. Sincerely,D3adh3adEdit: added the words "it seems" to show that this is just my opinion
No, I mean a highly detailed, click this, click that, watch this table for this, buy this when the price of that reaches this, sell that when this happens at that exchange... I'd really like to learn arbitrage if we can make money doing it
Quote from: kenCode on July 16, 2015, 09:20:01 am@xeroc could you writeup a step-by-step thread so that we could all take advantage of that? ie: you just put your orders this way:sell bitEUR for EUR at a price of > 1.0buy bitEUR for EUR at a price of < 1.0
@xeroc could you writeup a step-by-step thread so that we could all take advantage of that? ie:
Forbes article out 2 PM UK time16/7, would appreciate some love sent to CCEDKWell, they will say something is not right, maybe Bitshares is not the one I should focus on afterall, otherwise they would support someone mentioning them over and over again. That's just my thoughts on that anyways, an that would be a real shame!
Quote from: xeroc on July 16, 2015, 08:09:43 ambtw ... doing "arbitrage" in the bitEUR:EUR and the bitUSD:USD market is as easy as it can get .. kids in elementary school can do it .. why aren't you? @xeroc could you writeup a step-by-step thread so that we could all take advantage of that? ie: Open account at BitSharesOpen account at CCEDKOpen account at BTER (or whomever)Monitor this pair at these exchangesSet alert for blah blah trade triggerTransfer this to thereetc
btw ... doing "arbitrage" in the bitEUR:EUR and the bitUSD:USD market is as easy as it can get .. kids in elementary school can do it .. why aren't you?
Quote from: kenCode on July 15, 2015, 10:03:24 pmQuote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 15, 2015, 09:51:50 pmQuote from: kenCode on July 15, 2015, 09:36:26 pmCongrats on the Forbes writeup!! Please post a link here as soon as they post it online and I will blast it out over twitter and g+ as usual. My last tweet about the Nanocard got retweeted 11 times to over 21,000 followers! I'm doing everything I can to bring you volume as well Ronny, I know you're a workaholic like me, so showin you some love is not hard at all. I put EVERY CENT of fiat through CCEDK. I used the CCEDK "Instant Orders" button for the first time today too, to trade into some bitcoin then BitShares MUCH faster than waiting on a market order, so even though the volume isn't as big as other exchanges YET, it's WELL WORTH IT to support CCEDK even at this stage. I know the people in this BitShares community know how valuable CCEDK is and are also helping to promote it. The volume is picking up, just keep on trading! I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK and I trade out of ALL of my fiat on CCEDK. Did I mention I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK?@kenCode, you're 100% into crypto these days? you're my hero! hell yeah, fiat makes me nauseous.awesome! how are you paying rent, taxes, utilities, and groceries? i still haven't figured those out...
Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 15, 2015, 09:51:50 pmQuote from: kenCode on July 15, 2015, 09:36:26 pmCongrats on the Forbes writeup!! Please post a link here as soon as they post it online and I will blast it out over twitter and g+ as usual. My last tweet about the Nanocard got retweeted 11 times to over 21,000 followers! I'm doing everything I can to bring you volume as well Ronny, I know you're a workaholic like me, so showin you some love is not hard at all. I put EVERY CENT of fiat through CCEDK. I used the CCEDK "Instant Orders" button for the first time today too, to trade into some bitcoin then BitShares MUCH faster than waiting on a market order, so even though the volume isn't as big as other exchanges YET, it's WELL WORTH IT to support CCEDK even at this stage. I know the people in this BitShares community know how valuable CCEDK is and are also helping to promote it. The volume is picking up, just keep on trading! I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK and I trade out of ALL of my fiat on CCEDK. Did I mention I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK?@kenCode, you're 100% into crypto these days? you're my hero! hell yeah, fiat makes me nauseous.
Quote from: kenCode on July 15, 2015, 09:36:26 pmCongrats on the Forbes writeup!! Please post a link here as soon as they post it online and I will blast it out over twitter and g+ as usual. My last tweet about the Nanocard got retweeted 11 times to over 21,000 followers! I'm doing everything I can to bring you volume as well Ronny, I know you're a workaholic like me, so showin you some love is not hard at all. I put EVERY CENT of fiat through CCEDK. I used the CCEDK "Instant Orders" button for the first time today too, to trade into some bitcoin then BitShares MUCH faster than waiting on a market order, so even though the volume isn't as big as other exchanges YET, it's WELL WORTH IT to support CCEDK even at this stage. I know the people in this BitShares community know how valuable CCEDK is and are also helping to promote it. The volume is picking up, just keep on trading! I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK and I trade out of ALL of my fiat on CCEDK. Did I mention I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK?@kenCode, you're 100% into crypto these days? you're my hero!
Congrats on the Forbes writeup!! Please post a link here as soon as they post it online and I will blast it out over twitter and g+ as usual. My last tweet about the Nanocard got retweeted 11 times to over 21,000 followers! I'm doing everything I can to bring you volume as well Ronny, I know you're a workaholic like me, so showin you some love is not hard at all. I put EVERY CENT of fiat through CCEDK. I used the CCEDK "Instant Orders" button for the first time today too, to trade into some bitcoin then BitShares MUCH faster than waiting on a market order, so even though the volume isn't as big as other exchanges YET, it's WELL WORTH IT to support CCEDK even at this stage. I know the people in this BitShares community know how valuable CCEDK is and are also helping to promote it. The volume is picking up, just keep on trading! I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK and I trade out of ALL of my fiat on CCEDK. Did I mention I ♥LOVE♥ CCEDK?
I'll just stick my NXT-covered nose in here: Support Ronny, guys. CCEDK is a pretty good exchange, and the BTS (boo!)<> Fiat exchange possibilities that CCEDK offers are bloody useful.Stan and BTS have made a lot of PR out of CCEDK over the last weeks, so throwing a little trading love in Ronnys direction would be only fair.Just for laughs: how about a little NXT vs BTS trading war on CCEDK ?
@ccedk, have you guys thought of adding a feature like https://blocktrades.us where customers can trade without accounts or parking funds?
Yeah, should be neccesary... more love on euro ccedk its weak, i send fiat and left some offer posted and buy some bitusd and post to resell... really sad see ccedk like that, but its just the beggining. same send 0.1 btc for nanocard but keep it trading just for few days XDREALLY A LITTLE OF LOVE FOR EACH COMUNITY MEMBER WILL BE ENOUGHT TO POWER CCEDK COMMON !!a eur/usd pair should be helpfull too or bitusd/biteur