0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Can we test the referral system prior to the release?
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.htmlIf we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
I think this is a nice idea being slowly developed! How about all the delegates combine force to do a 'blasting' in order to max out the Internet-based transaction. The devs can possibly do their LAN test since they have the number of computers and a fast gigabit local area network. We will need to co-ordinate the timing here.How about that, guys? If you are keen, please SAY IT!Quote from: Stan on September 06, 2015, 02:30:08 amQuote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 amQuote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 amQuote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amQuote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pmWhen Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks @bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have Agreed!!Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.Someone want to take a shot at it?I'm sure it would be appreciated...
Quote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 amQuote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 amQuote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amQuote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pmWhen Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks @bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have Agreed!!Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.Someone want to take a shot at it?I'm sure it would be appreciated...
Quote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 amQuote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amQuote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pmWhen Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks @bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have Agreed!!
Quote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amQuote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pmWhen Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks @bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have
Quote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amQuote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pmWhen Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks @bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
Quote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amQuote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pmWhen Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
Quote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pmWhen Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.
When Tony says buy you buy.
Quote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.
Quote from: wuyanren on September 06, 2015, 03:31:04 amI think, it should be released a DVS client, so that more people to participate in the test, in the final timeThere is nothing to stop anyone of us from joining the test net. All are welcome!Check out https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17962.0.html and https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18312.0.html.
I think, it should be released a DVS client, so that more people to participate in the test, in the final time
Quote from: wuyanren on September 05, 2015, 12:28:06 pmQuote from: lakerta06 on September 05, 2015, 12:21:04 pmQuote from: wuyanren on September 05, 2015, 11:09:49 amI saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues You can see it here.there are only 3 bugs, 2 of them being labeled high-priority. I wouldn't say "a lot of problems" but is not my call anyways.
Quote from: lakerta06 on September 05, 2015, 12:21:04 pmQuote from: wuyanren on September 05, 2015, 11:09:49 amI saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues You can see it here.
Quote from: wuyanren on September 05, 2015, 11:09:49 amI saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?
I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publish
Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.Someone want to take a shot at it?I'm sure it would be appreciated...