121
General Discussion / Re: Roger Ver Bonus Hangout: (SILVERTICKET Entry Fee)
« on: February 12, 2016, 05:12:57 pm »
Wow, nice! Is there an agenda for this hangout or is it open discussion?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Snowdrift.coop uses network effects to put the power back in the hands of the people instead of the platform owners. At Snowdrift.coop, you become a project's patron with a monthly donation pledge: For each additional patron who gives with you, you will donate a little more (limited by the amount of funds you choose to make available to the system overall).
This way, those of us already pledged invite the rest of the world to join us. The existing patrons of a project will together match the donation from each new patron (although our exact proposal includes additional measures to accommodate varying pledge levels from different patrons).
This approach is something like the mutual assurance and reduced risk that we get from a hard threshold for a crowdfunding campaign… Except with Snowdrift.coop, the mutual assurance isn't all or nothing. It's flexible, sustainable, and designed specifically for the needs of funding free/libre/open digital works.
I don't think the price would react at all. It's a non-event. non-change. purely perceptual.
Anyone selling or buying on this non-change doesn't care enough about the project to understand this non-difference, and likely wouldn't even notice.
IMO, I don't think it makes sense to change for CMC reporting though, because the supply is not actually available, even if you accounted for what could conceivably be released over a year or two, it still doesn't amount to much.
However, I do think it makes sense to change the way we communicate and talk about the supply. Having a supply that goes down, and can *only go down is a very positive and healthy way of looking at it. Anywhere you might mention the supply just start with the total supply and if necessary derive the available supply.
price is for example, btc:bts, can we have it bts:btc? http://cryptofresh.com/a/OPENBTC
or a button to switch it? So it is consistent with the price showcased on other exchanges?
If you check here for exampel http://cryptofresh.com/a/OPEN.EMC people don't care about bts:emc they care about emc:btc
the command i use for the rpc has not changed,
cli_wallet -H 0.0.0.0:8092
in fact nothing in our set up has changed whatsoever.... really confused what could cause the rpc to stop responding like this,
can you @xeroc confirm you have no issues currently with your own rpc?
@roadscape can you?
i wouldnt be posting here if i hadnt exaused all my other attempts to resolve this for 8+ hours so im sorry for dragging you all in
all i get when i try my rpc is:
curl: (56) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer
./programs/cli_wallet/cli_wallet --rpc-http-endpoint="127.0.0.1:8081" -s ws://127.0.0.1:8082
They do require code changes and they do require a hardfork (if you askhow about we restrict most "advanced operations" to require LTM and only have the basic stuff in the basic membership included:
- transfers (also blind)
- trading
require LTM:
- proposals
- bond market (eventually)
- withdraw permissions
- creating assets
- creating accounts (already implemented that way)
This is a very interesting idea, and wouldn't require any code changes..
me) simply because those if/not checks are currently hard coded in the
graphene code .. Having them a blockchain parameter would be awesome!