Main > 中文 (Chinese)

bitshares白皮书中关于总量的不解

(1/3) > >>

a054936166:
还是感觉，发行量全看这家公司如何设置。。。

Amazon:
白皮书应该是很久没更新了，但是没有误解和歧义的肯定的是，ProtoShares总量最精确为2016000个，通常也就说200万个。BitShares总量是PTS的10倍，这是Invictus对Invictus未来发行的任何的DAC的社会承诺，请看下面第一条，这之中自然包扩BitShares。而ProtoShares对任何未来发布的DAC都拥有1：1免费领取的权利。


--- Quote from: bytemaster on November 13, 2013, 05:24:37 am ---
1) All chains Invictus launches will be derived from ProtoShares with a 1:1 mapping and 10% of the ultimate money supply of that chain.
2) ProtoDomains may Split from ProtoShares prior to the Launch of DomainShares so that it can be traded and valued separately.   
3) Keyhotee ID is not a currency, there is no way to map ProtoShares into Keyhotee ID (the name chain)
4) There will be many BitShares based chains, not one, and all of them will be 1:1 with ProtoShares
5) We reserve the right to release ProtoShares v2 that honors 100% of ProtoShares v1 with 100% of the money supply allocated. 
6) Associated Press, DAC would honor ProtoShares

Exceptions to the ProtoShares honoring would be if we decided to release a true competitor to be used as a money-only coin and not a trading platform.  In this case we may choose to honor the initial positions in ALL existing *-coin chains proportional to their market cap. 

I want to make it very clear that at no time will we 'reset the clock' for a new chain and owning ProtoShares today does get you ownership in everything we do in the future either directly or indirectly.

--- End quote ---

http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=531.0 这篇文章会一直留在本论坛。

zhao150:
我感觉这段话 是多余的，写了反而使别人误解。小数点后多几位也没事，或者 你们再推出一个小单位 都无大碍，但是币的总量这个可是大事，必须明确告诉大家的，不能有误解 和歧义。

zhao150:
BitShare Decimal / Divisibility vs Bitcoin
1 bitcoin is traditionally defined as 100,000,000 satoshi and as a result the community has
started to see things priced as 0.0001 BTC or less. As the value of a bitcoin grows, prices will
continue to have more and more leading 0’s. This makes it challenging for users to both
understand and compare prices and makes price tags on cheap items take a lot of numbers to
express. Furthermore, people are not as familiar with using milli, micro, or nano or other
fractional units as they are with using thousand, million, billion. These large units are easier to
‘round’, ‘talk about’, and ‘visually identify and compare’.
Throughout this paper we have referred to a BitShare as if it represented a similar percentage of
the share supply as 1 bitcoin to the bitcoin supply. The reality is that the initial mining reward will
be 5,000,000.000 BTS and 0.001 BTS is not any further divisible than a satoshi. Users will
initially price things in terms of millions of BitShares and over time prices will fall to thousands, or
even hundreds of BTS. By shifting the decimal point used in the BitShare network the effective
BitShare supply with be over 15,000,000,000,000 (15 Trillion) and could support an economy
with a $150 Trillion money supply with .001 BTS equal to $0.01. The US money supply (defined
by the M2 metric) is about $10 Trillion which means that BitShares could support an economy 15
times larger than the current world economy with the price of 1 BTS equal to $10.
这个 是你给我的最新版连接，我看了下 根本没有做修改啊，亲王翻译的 也没错啊。

Amazon:

--- Quote from: zhao150 on November 21, 2013, 04:45:10 am ---比特股和比特币的小数点位置/可分割性比较
1个比特币传统上定义为1亿聪，结果我们开始看到有些东西标价为0.0001BTC或者更少。随着比特币升值，价格的小数点后被加上了越来越多的0前缀。这个既让用户难于理解和比较价格，又使得标记一个很小的价格需要一大串数字。此外，人们不熟悉使用毫，微或者纳等小数单位，而习惯使用千，万，亿之类的单位。这些大的单位似乎更加容易谈论、圆整，感知和比较。
在本文中，我们提到的1比特股时，仿佛1比特股在所有比特股供应中占的比例与1比特币在所有比特币供应中占的比例相仿。事实是，采矿奖励会是500万比特股，0.001个比特股不会比一聪更可以分割。用户开始会用百万比特股给物品标价，随着时间的推移会下降到千，甚至到百个比特股。随着比特股网络中使用的小数点的移动，比特股的有效供应会超过15万亿，如果0.001比特股相当于0.01美元的话，可以支持总量超过150万亿美元的现金流。，美国货币供应量（M2）大约是 10万亿美元，这意味着在1比特股相当于10美元的情况下，比特股可以支持大约15倍目前世界经济规模的经济体。
这段翻译的 非常让人误解，一开始说BTS是500万个 怎么会随着时间的推移慢慢增长 到15万亿个，这个分明是滥发货币的通货膨胀吗？
我想应该是我误解了，BTS不会犯这种低级的错误吧，要不然BTS出来后没人会炒了，总量一直在扩大，也就是一直贬值？
希望官方 解释下，解除大家的顾虑。

--- End quote ---

这个白皮书的翻译应该是基于数个月前的白皮书，在这之后比特股的设计发生了很大变化，最后决定在2000w的数量，也就是原形股总量的10倍。
请参考最新版的白皮书链接：
http://static.squarespace.com/static/51fb043ee4b0608e46483caf/t/521f54b0e4b05eac92eff809/1377785008699/BitShares%20White%20Paper%20(2).pdf

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page