Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bobmaloney

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
226
General Discussion / Re: Merchant Marketing Pitch
« on: November 07, 2014, 08:52:02 pm »
Quote
Eliminate Chargebacks

You are in control of your funds and no one can hit you with a chargeback after you have delivered the goods.


Strike for being too wordy and sounding like a "catch".

The merchants honesty should be implied and not questioned within the pitch.

227
General Discussion / Re: Using Proof of Waste for Account Registration
« on: November 07, 2014, 08:49:44 am »
How about requiring a SQRL ID for registration?

It seems to solve many of these issues while helping to jump start SQRL, which walks the user through basic account registration and security setup in a fairly simple way.

228
General Discussion / Re: * SNAPSHOT NOTICE *
« on: November 05, 2014, 10:49:59 pm »
Quote from: wasthatawolf on November 05, 2014, 10:48:18 pm
Did the snapshot happen?

Soon http://time.unitarium.com/utc/2359

229
General Discussion / Re: Advice wanted: I'm considering running a marketing delegate.
« on: October 28, 2014, 10:21:26 pm »
I would really like to see growth in this direction.

I would support up to 4 delegates under your name: $10,000/mo budget > $2,500/mo budget

Doing this should draw additional marketing delegates, so I think running more than 1 delegate (at this time) is important.

230
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Re: 24 Oktober hangout with Bytemaster Raw unedited recordings
« on: October 24, 2014, 09:58:37 pm »
Thanks JoeyD.  :)

231
General Discussion / Re: [POLL] DISCUSSION: Should 3rd-party DACs honor AGS/PTS?
« on: October 24, 2014, 05:25:14 pm »
Quote from: CLains on October 24, 2014, 05:19:17 pm
I vote simplicity: 20% to BTS is complicated enough.

Personally I would gain more from 3, but this would be tremendously myopic. We need to think big! In addition, if people want to honor AGS or PTS they can do so if they want; AGS is already in stone, and PTS will be soon.

This should be the accepted standard, IMO.

20% BTS is plenty.

PTS/AGS should be viewed as something completely optional, but an extremely valuable and available tool - especially in highly competitive areas and those looking for stakeholders with a techno/libertarian ethos and bias.

232
General Discussion / Re: [POLL] DISCUSSION: Should 3rd-party DACs honor AGS/PTS?
« on: October 24, 2014, 04:59:18 pm »
PTS/AGS must offer something of benefit to future projects. If we attempt to position ourselves as coercive gatekeepers, we will only harm the growth of the ecosystem.

That being said, I believe there are plenty of potential projects that will find ample benefit in voluntarily issue to the PTS/AGS demographic.

233
General Discussion / Re: If you want to know.....
« on: October 23, 2014, 06:52:54 pm »
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 23, 2014, 06:11:40 pm
I agree with the communication problem. Invictus: I offer my talents to you freely. I'm good at constructing a clear message and simplifying things. Maybe I should become a deleagte and pledge to take on a PR role. Hmmm.

 +5%

234
General Discussion / Re: BTC38 (and now BTER) retroactive snapshot - lots of DNS holders made whole
« on: October 23, 2014, 04:32:25 pm »
I had claimed a portion of my DNS to allow for name registration.
Please provide us with instructions (maybe sticky it) to properly reimburse I3 with what we are overpaid.

235
KeyID / Re: DNS end-of-life: November 5th
« on: October 23, 2014, 02:48:47 am »
Some of us will always remember its real name:

Bitshares Toast ;-)

See you at the DACmall...

236
General Discussion / Re: Can someone ask Bter to increase DNS withdrawl limit?
« on: October 22, 2014, 10:29:44 pm »
Quote from: toast on October 22, 2014, 10:26:17 pm
BTER will probably honor the snapshot

But this requires that they stay operational for at least the next 2 years.

They should increase the limits to allow proper withdrawal before the snapshots take place.

237
General Discussion / Re: Stop arguing percentages and look at the bigger picture.
« on: October 22, 2014, 09:08:51 pm »
The last week has surely been the most exciting time to be a member of this community - it really seems as if the rockets are already firing and we're about to experience some serious G's.

238
General Discussion / Re: Sidechains paper released: The end of altcoins?
« on: October 22, 2014, 06:58:07 pm »
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 22, 2014, 06:51:36 pm
So could someone create a BitUSD sidechain for Bitcoin? Could a DPOS variant plug into Bitcoin?

That's the trillion dollar question, IMO.

Without yet reading or comprehending the significance of this - I would like to know if this pretty much simplifies the debate down to what we knew was coming:

PoW vs DPoS?

239
General Discussion / Re: Fix for DNS Holders who lost money buying into DNS
« on: October 22, 2014, 06:50:09 pm »
Looks like we're whole:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10368.msg136220#msg136220

Great job guys.

 +5%

240
General Discussion / Re: Fix for DNS Holders who lost money buying into DNS
« on: October 22, 2014, 06:46:10 pm »
These are the kind of hacks that give me a high degree of confidence in Dan and the rest of the I3 crew.

Good decision guys.

Good to see Shentist appreciates this move.

I'd like to hear from Bobb as well.

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 20 queries.