Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - noisy

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22
226
General Discussion / "Request new Coin" form + voting mechanism built in bitshares web wallet
« on: November 26, 2015, 05:41:51 pm »
Bitshares has great built in exchange . We should be more open for new customers, especially those who cannot find help or proper service in other places.

A lot of exchanges has "Request new Coin" mechanism (some of them are automated):
https://poloniex.com/coinRequest
https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/202583854
https://c-cex.com/?id=vote
https://www.cryptsy.com/coinvotes
...

This is great way to find new customers. Each release has official announcement, usually on bitcointalk. It would be great to mentioned there, each time, when new coin is released :)

There are limited number of 3 or 4 letter coin symbols. Thats why we cannot just add every coin. New coin should be founded by people who vote for specific coin. That would be easy way to crowdfound expensive 3 or 4 letter coins.

Cryptsy has two kind of votes:
  • free (each user is allowed 1 free vote per coin.)
  • paid votes (which have no limit on the number of votes)

I am not sure how this could be implemented, but I think some special bitshares account should be created (or pointer to not revocable address). What do you think about that?

227
General Discussion / Re: Introducing BitSharesNews.info
« on: November 24, 2015, 04:42:17 pm »
I really like the idea with transcriptions of hangounts!

228
Other Languages / Re: Polska (Polish)
« on: November 24, 2015, 04:40:07 pm »
Wygląda na to, że bitshares zmieni w końcu licencję, jeżeli rozumiem to na BSD.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20209.0.html

Ktoś ma jakieś zdanie czy to dobry wybór względem np. GPL/MIT?

Issue na ten temat na githubie: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/447

229
Marketplace / Re: Professional Whiteboard Animated videos
« on: November 24, 2015, 04:37:46 pm »
Personally, I don't like this kind of videos. They are saying "we cannot afford good quality animated video with good graphics and lector"

230
General Discussion / Re: Cryptonomex to License Graphene and Graphene-UI under BSD License
« on: November 24, 2015, 12:51:18 am »
just FYI, issue about that on github: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/447

231
General Discussion / Re: Cryptonomex to License Graphene and Graphene-UI under BSD License
« on: November 24, 2015, 12:07:45 am »
@bytemaster: is this means, that bitshares will be truly open, and now I will be able to legally create my own blockchain based on graphene code? :)

232
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Potential worker proposal - The copycat market maker bot
« on: November 06, 2015, 11:30:18 am »
great idea. We will need test network to check whether this is working as expected.

233
General Discussion / Re: List of current exchanges
« on: November 06, 2015, 12:45:10 am »
Quote from: kuro112 on November 05, 2015, 10:04:40 pm
hey guys, we are releasing a new exchange software here in the next few days that will have the highest liquidity of any bts market next to the actual bts decentralized exchange.

how or why this is the case i will not elude to, but i would just like to put in the word around town now and let you know to keep your eye out for Barter :)

BTW, what about livecoding? https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19625.0.html

Did you forget? Today I spent over an hour watching like someone wrote a part of web application. It is so addictive :)

234
Meta / Re: Forum Section
« on: November 05, 2015, 10:36:23 pm »
Maybe before new section will be created.. we will make some cleaning. After release of bitshares 2.0 I don't understand why there is still section bitshares 2.0 as a subsection of General Discussion

235
Technical Support / What keeping us from creating a test network?
« on: November 03, 2015, 11:13:42 pm »
This was said many times on forum, that test network could help:

  • present potential of bitshares
  • test upcoming releases
  • reduce cost of development of 3rd party gateways/bots/tools

It should be very simple to do that. Why we are not doing that?

236
General Discussion / Re: Introducing BunkerChain Labs Inc. - Your New Cryptonomex
« on: November 03, 2015, 06:30:37 pm »
I have one request: do not over-promise! Never! We prefer to wait longer, but not be disappointed that something was not delivered as was promised.

237
General Discussion / Re: PLEASE VOTE NEXT PROPOSAL: BOND OR PREDICTION MARKETS.
« on: November 03, 2015, 03:49:02 pm »
Next goal: make gateways working in "single-transfer" and "end-to-end" mode, without trading OPEN.BTC, TRADE.BTC, SOMETHING.BTC with bitBTC.

238
General Discussion / Re: Attention community developers: Change to Git forking model
« on: November 03, 2015, 03:46:54 pm »
Quote
One part says to merge your change fork with graphene/stable, and another part of the instructions say to merge with graphene/develop.

Sorry... typo. I have already corrected it.

239
General Discussion / Re: Attention community developers: Change to Git forking model
« on: November 03, 2015, 02:56:23 pm »
Quote
Do community contributors then:
Branch off graphene/stable
And pull request to graphene/develop?

We don't have permission to push to graphene/api-123 I think

Rather:

Code: [Select]
git clone https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene.git
cd graphene

# create own fork on github and add as your 2nd remote
git remote add noisy https://github.com/noisy/graphene.git

# sync repos before creating new branch
git fetch --all

# create new branch based on 'stable'
git checkout origin/stable -b api-123

# make some changes
vim README.md
git add README.md
git commit -m "type in README"

# push branch to your fork
git push noisy api-123

# And the last thing.... create a pull request: noisy/api-123 to graphene/develop
If you have ANY questions about git please ask me. I am always happy to help. I consider myself as git expert :) 8) I started using it in 2008 when I worked in Opera Software, and since then... git is considered by my as the most important tool I use :)

240
Technical Support / Re: The way how gateways should work.
« on: November 03, 2015, 02:17:18 am »
In my opinion... for now you could add new column:

This would be the step in the right direction



BTW... I calculated current spread from screenshot manually (bitBTC <-> OPEN.BTC, bitBTC<->TRADE.BTC). This is spread which we have right now :(

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 20 queries.