I think the biggest problem in this area is the lack of understanding between the East and West. I think it will be hard to communicate about the delegates from the 2 and so each side will be a little bit less trustful of the other side. I'd like to see as many Chinese delegates and I assume Chinese community would do a good job vetting them.
I'm talking about a economical situation in general .
Weather a delegate is capable and weather he can bring actual value to the system is two different thing .
The major concern is not vetting the delegate himself , but vetting the position and potential value for the system .
If this guy is good , do we want him ? Oh wait , let's see , the system already has 2 great guys are doing things in the same direction , can you joint them instead of applying a independent position ?
If this guy is good , but what he does can only gain value for the system maybe after 1 year or so , do we want to pay him to gamble the future ? We should think about it , and if we want to gamble , we'll vote for him .
If this guy sounds bad , but what he propose may actually gain value for the system in big time , do we want him ?
Votes can only be worth something if the ones voting it are thinking from every aspect .
Every company has votes , good employees at some point , but not every one of them survived .
By voting , we are not just voting for a person , we're voting for the future and direction of the system .
If everyone thinks "it should not be any doubt to vote for somebody" , then what will we become ?
If we lost the power or incentive for even a single doubt , then what is the voting for ?