0.9.3 updated
I'll be submitting a worker proposal to keep this going BitShares 2.0. Possibly setting up distribution server instead of launchpad.
Would people prefer:
1) a new
http://ppa.bitshares.org (or something like that) with builds for Debian, Raspbian, Ubuntu on amd64, i386, ARM
or
2) Just keep using Launchpad for Ubuntu
Advantage of (1): All Debian-based distros and architectures can be supported, we keep bitshares branding. Disadvantage of (2): Slight expense (to be built in to worker proposal), have to maintain technical infrastructure.
Advantage of (2): use Canonical infrastructure, people are familiar with it. Downside to (1): limited to Ubuntu amd64 and i386
I guess I can put up two worker proposals and see which one (or both) gets funded.
Also, if you're experienced with PPAs/Debian Development and want to be a part of my worker proposal, please contact me. Same goes with other distributions, maybe we can have a single worker proposal so we can take advantage of scaling and redundancy.