我希望3i，尽快开除这个不干事的沈波

言论有点过激，没有任何根据说明沈波没有干事，

没用的东西  PTSer  至少有60天锁定期, 骗关注  60后炒完了
居然不少人为此背书

Quote from: tbkmcjl on May 27, 2014, 02:41:18 am

挖矿算法是他自己设计的，不是别人强加的。
PTS的难度调整多垃圾你也看到吧，mmc如果也是这个原因，真要猜一下他到底想干什么了。莫非他碰过的币都离不开这个下场？

至于矿工砸盘，不如说小众市场信心尽失。
本来mmc就因为他自己的历史原因，弄得只有极少数平台愿意上架，市场深度低，他还弄一个发工资的算法，每天通过管理员工资的形式往市场上抛几千个币（在12月底1月初，这每天几千个就是上万元人民币啊），一个月多少？

管理员的工资（包括他自己）是按天，而不是按工作量算，管理员所谓投票换了一茬又一茬，但出来的工作成果明显与当时的法币价值有巨大差异。（还有个管理员得了工资后，发一小部分工资将任务外包给另一个人干，这个人上论坛发帖了。）

管理员就是大矿工，旱涝保收一天几千个币，每天收工资换一次，市场深度又低一些。这样的币能不死么。

我希望光头强做事是有能力的，否则，就表示他心思有问题了。

另外有些人觉得只要pts有分红，什么人来无所谓。但到时候推广是以3i的名义，市场也只认3i的牌子。举228的例子来说吧，pts拉升的那一段时间，连mmc都趁机拉升了一把套人，到处群的消息都说这个是3i的产品，pts利好，所以mmc也利好。
---------------------------------
我就放这里预测一下吧：经过三个月以上的锁定期后（三个月还只是随机的呢，最长十几个月），这个新币的买单已经被他自己拥有的百分之几十砸光了，其他人赠送得到的币，卖不出任何价值，然后市场又说：3i推广的币，就是不靠谱，跟mmc一样。

三个月后，挖这个帖子看，希望我预测错了。

10% PTS, 10% AGS, 10% MMC   ,30%项目有帮助的人， 前面这些60%至少冻结3个月，后面的40% 则根据狗币，BTC的排行进行分配。换句话说即使他有30%也是冻结的？因为BTC与狗币分配的应该不是很多，但是这些是不会被冻结，猜得没错这次主要是向BTC与狗币的持有人进行推广。因为两种币持有的人多，这种推广策略确实不错。其实我感兴趣的不是他的分配方案，也不是他的算法，这个币价值还有生存期。
而是这个DAC的玩法
从42个数字中选择3-6个号码投注任意数量股份.开奖号码从区块链中随机生成
6 个号码 = 1,000,000 倍
5 个号码 = 5,000 倍
4 个号码 = 100 倍
3 个号码 = 10 倍
感觉还不错
我想这种彩票投注的方式以后涉及博彩方面DAC可以借鉴一下，毕竟能够提出这样投注式玩法的DAC不多。

这个就是单色球的玩法而已，
锁定60天的一个DAC ，就当没送而已， PTS 和AGS 和MMC 就是陪太子读书，

Quote from: atmos on May 22, 2014, 03:01:06 pm

Bytemaster, with all the examples you mentioned you talk about 51% being enough to gain the ability to produce 100% of the blocks. How is that possible if with Bitcoin the chance of finding a block is based on the probability relative to your hasing power? Wouldnt it be the case that 49% of the blocks would still be produced by the 49% minority? The same for NXT because it is also probabilistic. And for the deterministic DPOS wouldnt the non colluding 49% be able to produce blocks as they wish when it's their turn?

The block producers get to choose which blocks they build off of.  They can safely ignore blocks found by the 49%.... sure they 49% will still find blocks, they will just be orphaned.

Hi bytemaster 
attaker have 51"% hash power  ,and he does not want chain fork ,but he only have 51% chance to find lucky No. to produce block , others also have 49% hash power ,and have 49% chance find lucky No. to produce block .
so the attacker have 0.51^6=0.0175 chance produce 6 continual blocks , others have 0.49^6=0.0138 chance to produce 6 continual blocks, and there are 0.968=96.8% chance of attaker and others producing blocks in 6 blocks
if the attacker  produce blocks and does not announce it until he produce 6 continual block, this will make chain fork.

I have read the money expenditure of MSC roughly ,  they only spend 947 BTC so far ,
but III have spended 1319 BTC and 33955 PTS

但语焉不详引起的惊慌是对这个公司的又一次打击

1. 共存的无厘头
2. 共存就有利益分配问题 稀释持有者的利益；制造靠pts1敛财的机会

这就是文化差异吗?

Quote from: BTSdac on May 21, 2014, 06:37:06 am

Quote from: Stan on May 21, 2014, 06:15:29 am

Quote from: Tradingriver on May 21, 2014, 05:20:35 am

everyone seems confused - me too!

10% PTS and 10% AGS at least for new DACs from Invictus so far

what happens when PTS 2 is released?

PTS2 is an upgrade so it must honor its predecessor 1 for 1.  A mere upgrade should never siphon value from an existing chain to give to another group.

Now, if you are releasing a new chain, you want to attract all the competitive advantages for it you can.  Honoring PTS 10% and AGS 10% gets you their support and our support.  That leaves you 80% to go after other demographic groups, fund development, fund marketing, or whatever.

Hi stan
          to my undertanding it is a upgrade , it is simple thing , I think a better way is to announce a forced update. then everybody can understand this.

Yes, I tried that.  Got called "arrogant" for even considering such a thing.   

Bottom line is we usually have to explain all our new ideas several different ways before everyone gets comfortable with it.

Yes  I understand you