Would you trust even $5K to a mixer?
no, I'd split it.
btw, why not hire a worker to implement a onchain mixer?
I'd split it too. It would get boring soon though.
And for this to scale in terms of management the accounts in the wallet must be deletable.
I'm not saying it isn't possible (since 0.9 does not seem to allow removing accounts, I already keep >1 wallet in 0.9 by symlinking .BitShares/wallets/default to the wallet I intend to use before starting up the client), I'm saying it ends up being a lot more trouble to maintain than TITAN ever was.
I can understand no TITAN means simplified clients, light wallets, etc, but look.. wasn't somebody already developing an android light wallet? And the online wallet did not use TITAN either (afaik - never really used it myself).
The statement that TITAN made the full client slow appears bogus as well, would it really slow things down if none of your accounts are TITAN?
To sum it up, it seems that we have now made privacy much more difficult and error prone to achieve, plus almost guaranteed to depend on a 3rd party service to get it. But I fully appreciate that I may be missing something here.
What do you think?