The BitShares development team is proud to make their biggest announcement since launching one year ago: the upgrade to BitShares 2.0.
This is the next step in the evolution of BitShares, and incorporates all of the feedback and lessons learned from the BitShares stakeholders, partners, developers, marketers, and other community leaders throughout this past year of research and development.
Up until now, the core development team has closely controlled the development and direction of BitShares. With BitShares reaching maturity at version 2.0, the team is ready to remove the training wheels, and let the direction of all future development be decided completely by stakeholder vote.
To help ensure the long-term success of BitShares technology, the core development team will be reorganizing into Cryptonomex Inc., an independent blockchain development company. By utilizing a new worker voting system that will be included in BitShares 2.0, this company will continue to help develop BitShares in whatever direction is approved by its stakeholders. With this new structure, BitShares will be more robust, sustainable, and fair than ever.
http://bitshares.github.io/blog/2015/06/08/announcing-bitshares-2.0/
We will be having a Mumble session at 4 PM EST today to discuss the latest news.
bitshares.org will be updated shortly to point at http://bitshares.github.io
I would like to thank everyone who helped make this possible!
http://bitshares.github.io/blog/2015/06/08/announcing-bitshares-2.0/
We will be having a Mumble session at 4 PM EST today to discuss the latest news.
bitshares.org will be updated shortly to point at http://bitshares.github.io
I would like to thank everyone who helped make this possible!
How is it 2.0 when we don't even have 1.0?
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
Who owns Cryptonomex Inc?
What happens to I3?
Care to let us know about any partners involved with Cryptonomex Inc?
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
but once the migration occurs such a race will happen?
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
http://bitshares.github.io/blog/2015/06/08/announcing-bitshares-2.0/
We will be having a Mumble session at 4 PM EST today to discuss the latest news.
bitshares.org will be updated shortly to point at http://bitshares.github.io
I would like to thank everyone who helped make this possible!
How is it 2.0 when we don't even have 1.0?
1.0 will have a very short shelf life. This isn't the same code base as BitShares 0.9.x so calling it 1.0 wouldn't do it justice. It is all just a naming convention anyway.
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
please elaborate. does that mean our current account names will be gone with the new version?
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
please elaborate. does that mean our current account names will be gone with the new version?
please elaborate. does that mean our current account names will be gone with the new version?
Referral Program
Earn $80 or more for every lifetime member you sign up.
BitShares™ has several different kinds of accounts: Basic Account, Annual Member, and Lifetime Member.
Basic Accounts are free, but do not qualify for the referral program, nor any cash back on transaction fees.
Annual Members pay a subscription fee of $20/year and earn 50% cash back on every fee they pay. They also qualify for up to 50% of the fees paid by anyone they refer to the network until their subscription expires.
Lifetime Members pay $100 and earn 80% cash back on every fee they pay. They also qualify for 80% of the fees paid by Basic Accounts they refer to the network. Additionally, they qualify for 30% of every fee paid by any Annual Member they have referred. In the event of a subscription expiration, the referral income falls back to the nearest Lifetime Member in the referral history.
These cashback referral rates, 50% and 80%, can be adjusted by the consensus of the BitShares Stakeholders at any time. Annual Accounts have their rates locked in for one year, while Lifetime Accounts have their rates locked in for life.
We estimate that the average fees paid over the lifetime of each Account will be in excess of $1002, which means that a membership could earn over $80 per referred user. Of course, it is your own responsibility to estimate how often you, and those you refer, will use the network. Keep in mind that the BitShares stakeholders have the ability to change transaction fees, which could impact future earnings.
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
please elaborate. does that mean our current account names will be gone with the new version?
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
please elaborate. does that mean our current account names will be gone with the new version?
They will be migrated, check out the migration strategy blog post for more details: http://bitshares.github.io/blog/2015/06/08/migrating-to-bitshares-2.0/
https://bitshares.github.io/technology/
Dynamic Account Permissions
Every account can be controlled by any weighted combination of other accounts and private keys.
This creates a hierarchical structure that reflects how permissions are organized in real life, and makes
multi-user control over funds easier than ever. Multi-user control is the single biggest contributor to
security, and, when used properly, it can virtually eliminate the risk of theft due to hacking.
multisig is solved..
(http://i.imgur.com/c9Kpwuk.gif)
https://bitshares.github.io/technology/
Dynamic Account Permissions
Every account can be controlled by any weighted combination of other accounts and private keys.
This creates a hierarchical structure that reflects how permissions are organized in real life, and makes
multi-user control over funds easier than ever. Multi-user control is the single biggest contributor to
security, and, when used properly, it can virtually eliminate the risk of theft due to hacking.
multisig is solved..
(http://i.imgur.com/c9Kpwuk.gif)
I was wondering how long it would take people to discover this and realize its importance :)
https://bitshares.github.io/technology/
Dynamic Account Permissions
Every account can be controlled by any weighted combination of other accounts and private keys.
This creates a hierarchical structure that reflects how permissions are organized in real life, and makes
multi-user control over funds easier than ever. Multi-user control is the single biggest contributor to
security, and, when used properly, it can virtually eliminate the risk of theft due to hacking.
multisig is solved..
(http://i.imgur.com/c9Kpwuk.gif)
I was wondering how long it would take people to discover this and realize its importance :)
I love that the new client will be an entirely broswer based wallet. This will greatly reduce the barrier to entry.
At present, its very easy for me to have a bitcoin wallet at blockchain.org, or a dogecoin wallet at dogechain, or whatever. But having a Bitshares wallet was very difficult, required me to update the client, took a long time to sync the blockchain, and hogged my computer resources when I ran it.
This will be a MASSIVE upgrade to usability.
I love that the new client will be an entirely broswer based wallet. This will greatly reduce the barrier to entry.
At present, its very easy for me to have a bitcoin wallet at blockchain.org, or a dogecoin wallet at dogechain, or whatever. But having a Bitshares wallet was very difficult, required me to update the client, took a long time to sync the blockchain, and hogged my computer resources when I ran it.
This will be a MASSIVE upgrade to usability.
The new client architecture is much easier to work with as well, and having built-in websocket support makes everything so much cleaner. Instead of constantly polling for updates we can now simply subscribe to updates for an account or a market, and get instant notifications whenever something happens. It's pure gold :)
We've also switched to using React instead of Angular so the new wallet will be much much faster.
I love that the new client will be an entirely broswer based wallet. This will greatly reduce the barrier to entry.
At present, its very easy for me to have a bitcoin wallet at blockchain.org, or a dogecoin wallet at dogechain, or whatever. But having a Bitshares wallet was very difficult, required me to update the client, took a long time to sync the blockchain, and hogged my computer resources when I ran it.
This will be a MASSIVE upgrade to usability.
The new client architecture is much easier to work with as well, and having built-in websocket support makes everything so much cleaner. Instead of constantly polling for updates we can now simply subscribe to updates for an account or a market, and get instant notifications whenever something happens. It's pure gold :)
We've also switched to using React instead of Angular so the new wallet will be much much faster.
SVK has made a HUGE contribution to the GUI that is as big as any other core developer. Thank you SVK for joining the team and helping make the new UI better than ever!
Multi-sighttps://bitshares.github.io/technology/
Dynamic Account Permissions
Every account can be controlled by any weighted combination of other accounts and private keys.
This creates a hierarchical structure that reflects how permissions are organized in real life, and makes
multi-user control over funds easier than ever. Multi-user control is the single biggest contributor to
security, and, when used properly, it can virtually eliminate the risk of theft due to hacking.
multisig is solved..
(http://i.imgur.com/c9Kpwuk.gif)
I was wondering how long it would take people to discover this and realize its importance :)
Reward Vesting Requirements
All cashback and referral income are deposited into a special balance which must vest linearly for 1 year. This means that after 6 months you can withdraw about 50% of your cash back, but your remaining funds will take an additional year to vest. This is because the vesting process is based upon accumulating “BTS-years”, for each BTS-year accumulated you can withdraw 1 BTS. If you leave 100 BTS in the account for 1 year then you will have accumulated 100 BTS-years and can withdraw 100 BTS. On the other hand, if you withdraw 50 BTS after 6 months, then you will have consumed 50 BTS-years leaving your account with 50 BTS and 0 BTS-years. It will take a full year to accumulate another 50 BTS-years.
I love that the new client will be an entirely broswer based wallet. This will greatly reduce the barrier to entry.
At present, its very easy for me to have a bitcoin wallet at blockchain.org, or a dogecoin wallet at dogechain, or whatever. But having a Bitshares wallet was very difficult, required me to update the client, took a long time to sync the blockchain, and hogged my computer resources when I ran it.
This will be a MASSIVE upgrade to usability.
The new client architecture is much easier to work with as well, and having built-in websocket support makes everything so much cleaner. Instead of constantly polling for updates we can now simply subscribe to updates for an account or a market, and get instant notifications whenever something happens. It's pure gold :)
We've also switched to using React instead of Angular so the new wallet will be much much faster.
Questions,
Will marketing be finally able to be done for BitShares after the trial period?
Regarding the transaction amount. Claiming it handles more than visa is a big statement, has this been tested? or will this be properly tested during the trial period?
Referrals: how does the client know who referred someone? will there be a special client download?
also,QuoteReward Vesting Requirements
All cashback and referral income are deposited into a special balance which must vest linearly for 1 year. This means that after 6 months you can withdraw about 50% of your cash back, but your remaining funds will take an additional year to vest. This is because the vesting process is based upon accumulating “BTS-years”, for each BTS-year accumulated you can withdraw 1 BTS. If you leave 100 BTS in the account for 1 year then you will have accumulated 100 BTS-years and can withdraw 100 BTS. On the other hand, if you withdraw 50 BTS after 6 months, then you will have consumed 50 BTS-years leaving your account with 50 BTS and 0 BTS-years. It will take a full year to accumulate another 50 BTS-years.
I don't like this at all. If you spent time bringing people to the network, you probably need some money for advertisement etc. you won't be able to reinvest this way
Referrals: how does the client know who referred someone? will there be a special client download?
also,QuoteReward Vesting Requirements
All cashback and referral income are deposited into a special balance which must vest linearly for 1 year. This means that after 6 months you can withdraw about 50% of your cash back, but your remaining funds will take an additional year to vest. This is because the vesting process is based upon accumulating “BTS-years”, for each BTS-year accumulated you can withdraw 1 BTS. If you leave 100 BTS in the account for 1 year then you will have accumulated 100 BTS-years and can withdraw 100 BTS. On the other hand, if you withdraw 50 BTS after 6 months, then you will have consumed 50 BTS-years leaving your account with 50 BTS and 0 BTS-years. It will take a full year to accumulate another 50 BTS-years.
I don't like this at all. If you spent time bringing people to the network, you probably need some money for advertisement etc. you won't be able to reinvest this way
Our user demographic would never spend money to try a new tech :/
Our user demographic would never spend money to try a new tech :/
It is really rather simple to finance things to get the funds. Unfortunately, without required centralized ID verification there is no way to "give" samples away to new users.
Our user demographic would never spend money to try a new tech :/
It is really rather simple to finance things to get the funds. Unfortunately, without required centralized ID verification there is no way to "give" samples away to new users.
Why would a person want to undergo an ID verification to try a demo of bitshares ?
Or do you mean the company raising funds in large sums for this purpose ?
Referrals: how does the client know who referred someone? will there be a special client download?
also,QuoteReward Vesting Requirements
All cashback and referral income are deposited into a special balance which must vest linearly for 1 year. This means that after 6 months you can withdraw about 50% of your cash back, but your remaining funds will take an additional year to vest. This is because the vesting process is based upon accumulating “BTS-years”, for each BTS-year accumulated you can withdraw 1 BTS. If you leave 100 BTS in the account for 1 year then you will have accumulated 100 BTS-years and can withdraw 100 BTS. On the other hand, if you withdraw 50 BTS after 6 months, then you will have consumed 50 BTS-years leaving your account with 50 BTS and 0 BTS-years. It will take a full year to accumulate another 50 BTS-years.
I don't like this at all. If you spent time bringing people to the network, you probably need some money for advertisement etc. you won't be able to reinvest this way
Sadly, vesting was required to address a potential attack vector on the referral incentives. Also, it helps mitigate Ponzi/Pyramid/Get Rich Quick type accusations.
how do you invite people? is there a special client download page? ref links?The account that pays the fee for the account registration of someone else is the referrer ..
how do you invite people? is there a special client download page? ref links?The account that pays the fee for the account registration of someone else is the referrer ..
Our user demographic would never spend money to try a new tech :/
It is really rather simple to finance things to get the funds. Unfortunately, without required centralized ID verification there is no way to "give" samples away to new users.
Why would a person want to undergo an ID verification to try a demo of bitshares ?
Or do you mean the company raising funds in large sums for this purpose ?
I mean it is a technical limitation of decentralized systems that without "proof of uniqueness" or "proof of work" the "free samples" given away will be sybil attacked and fail. Bitcoin's referral program was proof of work... but now it has been abused.
how do you invite people? is there a special client download page? ref links?The account that pays the fee for the account registration of someone else is the referrer ..
how do you invite people? is there a special client download page? ref links?The account that pays the fee for the account registration of someone else is the referrer ..
that means no traditional marketing methods would even work (like google ads)
nope, I think this referral program is a waste of time :<
how do you invite people? is there a special client download page? ref links?The account that pays the fee for the account registration of someone else is the referrer ..
that means no traditional marketing methods would even work (like google ads)
nope, I think this referral program is a waste of time :<
how do you invite people? is there a special client download page? ref links?The account that pays the fee for the account registration of someone else is the referrer ..
that means no traditional marketing methods would even work (like google ads)
nope, I think this referral program is a waste of time :<
When bloggers and podcasters and exchanges and banks and gaming communities start signing up their existing user bases en masse, the value of a rate limit on their liquidation will become apparent.
Is there an ETA when the software will be ready?
official answer?Is there an ETA when the software will be ready?
Q3 2015
official answer?Is there an ETA when the software will be ready?
Q3 2015
official answer?Is there an ETA when the software will be ready?
Q3 2015
"This Summer"
"
As soon as the software is ready, it will enter a public testing period for gathering community feedback. This testing period will last until the community is satisfied with the new system, after which an upgrade snapshot date will be announced with at least 30 days notice.
"
Is there an ETA when the software will be ready?
Let's just push it to Christmasofficial answer?Is there an ETA when the software will be ready?
Q3 2015
"This Summer"
Best to bear in mind that "E" in ETA then...
I love that the new client will be an entirely broswer based wallet. This will greatly reduce the barrier to entry.
At present, its very easy for me to have a bitcoin wallet at blockchain.org, or a dogecoin wallet at dogechain, or whatever. But having a Bitshares wallet was very difficult, required me to update the client, took a long time to sync the blockchain, and hogged my computer resources when I ran it.
This will be a MASSIVE upgrade to usability.
The new client architecture is much easier to work with as well, and having built-in websocket support makes everything so much cleaner. Instead of constantly polling for updates we can now simply subscribe to updates for an account or a market, and get instant notifications whenever something happens. It's pure gold :)
We've also switched to using React instead of Angular so the new wallet will be much much faster.
SVK has made a HUGE contribution to the GUI that is as big as any other core developer. Thank you SVK for joining the team and helping make the new UI better than ever!
that means no traditional marketing methods would even work (like google ads)
nope, I think this referral program is a waste of time :<
that means no traditional marketing methods would even work (like google ads)
nope, I think this referral program is a waste of time :<
You're worried that a referrer will have to run a full node, create a transaction on the user's behalf, get the user to sign it and return the signed tx, then broadcast the tx.
We realized this would be a problem soon after the initial design of the referral system, and we have a solution. That's what the registrar is for. Essentially we split the referral role into two parts: the referrer can be a traditional internet marketer, all they have to do is get the user to click a link to some hosted wallet with ?r=youraccount. The operator of the hosted wallet is a registrar who takes care of all the hard blockchain stuff. The referrer and registrar split the commission (and the split doesn't have to be 50-50, any percentage is possible at the blockchain level.)
Any good marketer who can collect users can be their own registrar and get 100% of the commission, but marketers may not want to deal with the technology headaches of being a registrar.
By making it easy for them to split their commissions, any marketer (referrer) can partner with any technologist (registrar) and maximize their value because both are focused on their specialty instead of trying to simultaneously master both marketing and technology.
The official hosted wallet website will function as a registrar based on ?r= parameter on incoming links, but competing registrars will almost certainly spring up. The free market should allow opportunity for a variety of cooperative and competitive relationships to form.
I should also note that payouts are based on income and vest for some time, which greatly mitigates a variety of potential referral abuses.
and whats up with sparkles is waiting 1.0 :o
and whats up with sparkles is waiting 1.0 :o
guess they will miss the train ;D
Sparkle was originally intended to be PoW, not DPOS. That was the whole point: bitshares functionality on a PoW chain.
Something tells me Sparkle is DOA.
and whats up with sparkles is waiting 1.0 :o
whats DOA means?
i buy a quad processor for dig sparkles
Our user demographic would never spend money to try a new tech :/
It is really rather simple to finance things to get the funds. Unfortunately, without required centralized ID verification there is no way to "give" samples away to new users.
Why would a person want to undergo an ID verification to try a demo of bitshares ?
Or do you mean the company raising funds in large sums for this purpose ?
I mean it is a technical limitation of decentralized systems that without "proof of uniqueness" or "proof of work" the "free samples" given away will be sybil attacked and fail. Bitcoin's referral program was proof of work... but now it has been abused.
What kind of ID verification is required?no ID verification is required to use BitShares ..
Our user demographic would never spend money to try a new tech :/
It is really rather simple to finance things to get the funds. Unfortunately, without required centralized ID verification there is no way to "give" samples away to new users.
Why would a person want to undergo an ID verification to try a demo of bitshares ?
Or do you mean the company raising funds in large sums for this purpose ?
I mean it is a technical limitation of decentralized systems that without "proof of uniqueness" or "proof of work" the "free samples" given away will be sybil attacked and fail. Bitcoin's referral program was proof of work... but now it has been abused.
What kind of ID verification is required?
Let's rephrase the question then,none ..
what kind of "proof of uniqueness" is required?
What kind of ID verification is required?no ID verification is required to use BitShares ..
ID verification may be required to use "some" User-Issued assets ..
If there was ID verification, sending out free samples to attract people would be possible ..
that's the reason we now have the more sophisticated referral program to attract people instead
What kind of ID verification is required?no ID verification is required to use BitShares ..
ID verification may be required to use "some" User-Issued assets ..
If there was ID verification, sending out free samples to attract people would be possible ..
that's the reason we now have the more sophisticated referral program to attract people instead
Essentially proof of stake with subscription fees?
Are there any prints of the GUI? I'm very curious. A small, basic video, just messing around and showing the tabs or voting would be nice to share around
What kind of ID verification is required?no ID verification is required to use BitShares ..
ID verification may be required to use "some" User-Issued assets ..
If there was ID verification, sending out free samples to attract people would be possible ..
that's the reason we now have the more sophisticated referral program to attract people instead
Essentially proof of stake with subscription fees?
You have two options to increase adoption:
Hand out free bitUSD to new users ... this requires ID verification to not get abused
or alternatively make it like BitShares 2.0 and redistribute tx fees ...
that way no ID verification is required to incentivize user adoption ..
There's also a subscription fee so I was wondering if that was part of proof of having stake too or just something additional.not sure about the economical part here ... but extra features should require extra fee, no?
I love that the new client will be an entirely broswer based wallet. This will greatly reduce the barrier to entry.
At present, its very easy for me to have a bitcoin wallet at blockchain.org, or a dogecoin wallet at dogechain, or whatever. But having a Bitshares wallet was very difficult, required me to update the client, took a long time to sync the blockchain, and hogged my computer resources when I ran it.
This will be a MASSIVE upgrade to usability.
Also, it seems the new client is not the same codebase as 0.9.x.No, no TITAN. This is a good thing! TITAN wasn't really very effective for privacy, but it gave the illusion of privacy. Also, TITAN was one of the reasons the client was so unbelievably slow.
Is TITAN also baked in the new codebase? Will we have privacy built-in by default?
Referrals: how does the client know who referred someone? will there be a special client download?
also,QuoteReward Vesting Requirements
All cashback and referral income are deposited into a special balance which must vest linearly for 1 year. This means that after 6 months you can withdraw about 50% of your cash back, but your remaining funds will take an additional year to vest. This is because the vesting process is based upon accumulating “BTS-years”, for each BTS-year accumulated you can withdraw 1 BTS. If you leave 100 BTS in the account for 1 year then you will have accumulated 100 BTS-years and can withdraw 100 BTS. On the other hand, if you withdraw 50 BTS after 6 months, then you will have consumed 50 BTS-years leaving your account with 50 BTS and 0 BTS-years. It will take a full year to accumulate another 50 BTS-years.
I don't like this at all. If you spent time bringing people to the network, you probably need some money for advertisement etc. you won't be able to reinvest this way
Sadly, vesting was required to address a potential attack vector on the referral incentives. Also, it helps mitigate Ponzi/Pyramid/Get Rich Quick type accusations.
... the value of a rate limit on their liquidation will become apparent.
official answer?Is there an ETA when the software will be ready?
Q3 2015
"This Summer"
oh my goodness this is all gonna take my feeble mind a while to digest.
am I understanding this one small part correctly, is there going to be a race for valuable account names for DNS purposes?
all names registered after today will have a prefix appended to them.
That TODO item got lost in the rush to get this info out.
but once the migration occurs such a race will happen?
Perhaps, but quality names will cost much more.
Another thing I was thinking about while reading about the changes was how the state is committed to disk only on exit. I understand that it stores the blocks to disk as it receives them so that it can always recover the database state from scratch if necessary. But I don't see why it couldn't periodically commit the database state to disk so that if it fails it doesn't need to replay from the last time the program exited (which may be a long time ago). In fact, if memory usage is so low, I think it would be cool to use just double the memory by using some memory page copy-on-write system to take a snapshot of the memory state while continuing to evolve the other copy, and then asynchronously serializing the snapshot copy to disk. Then when that serialization is done, the memory of the snapshot copy can be freed from RAM to repeat the process over again by taking a snapshot of the evolved copy. In fact, maybe the serialization can be delayed by some period to ensure that the time limit for chain reorganization has passed and so that you know you (almost never) would need replay the blockchain from any committed state older the most recent one, which is probably less than 5 hours old. LimeWallet) to build the mobile-optimized BitShares clients?
We do bring it down every other night to write out the state to disk to help contain transaction log size.
We do bring it down every other night to write out the state to disk to help contain transaction log size.
Now that I think about it, the witness nodes don't even need to go down. A separate node running in parallel could just successfully exit once per day to keep a daily serialization of database state to disk. It being offline when the witness node needs to sign blocks is irrelevant since the witness node would not need to exit. Then if the witness node crashes, the administrator can move the recent snapshot state from the disk of the other node to the witness node and just replay from there. So yeah, there is no need for the live periodic state dumps.
OK for the slower guys like me ...
after figuring out that Cryptonomex is actually Crypto + Economics . And is pronounced like Crypto +Economics
Can someone help with the same for:
Graphene
I guess the first part is from Graph...
OK for the slower guys like me ...
after figuring out that Cryptonomex is actually Crypto + Economics . And is pronounced like Crypto +Economics
Can someone help with the same for:
Graphene
I guess the first part is from Graph...
Can someone help with the same for:
Graphene
I guess the first part is from Graph...
OK for the slower guys like me ...
after figuring out that Cryptonomex is actually Crypto + Economics . And is pronounced like Crypto +Economics
OK for the slower guys like me ...
after figuring out that Cryptonomex is actually Crypto + Economics . And is pronounced like Crypto +Economics
Can someone help with the same for:
Graphene
I guess the first part is from Graph...
Graphene is an atomic-scale honeycomb lattice made of carbon atoms.
Graphene (/ˈɡræf.iːn/)[1][2] is an allotrope of carbon in the form of a two-dimensional, atomic-scale, hexagonal lattice in which one atom forms each vertex. It is the basic structural element of other allotropes, including graphite, charcoal, carbon nanotubes and fullerenes. It can also be considered as an indefinitely large aromatic molecule, the limiting case of the family of flat polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene
During yesterday's mumble. Loved it!
(http://s21.postimg.org/lpp0b3d6v/Untitled.jpg)
OK for the slower guys like me ...
after figuring out that Cryptonomex is actually Crypto + Economics . And is pronounced like Crypto +Economics
yep right!
Also, it seems the new client is not the same codebase as 0.9.x.No, no TITAN. This is a good thing! TITAN wasn't really very effective for privacy, but it gave the illusion of privacy. Also, TITAN was one of the reasons the client was so unbelievably slow.
Is TITAN also baked in the new codebase? Will we have privacy built-in by default?
Sent from my LGL34C using Tapatalk
Also, it seems the new client is not the same codebase as 0.9.x.No, no TITAN. This is a good thing! TITAN wasn't really very effective for privacy, but it gave the illusion of privacy. Also, TITAN was one of the reasons the client was so unbelievably slow.
Is TITAN also baked in the new codebase? Will we have privacy built-in by default?
Sent from my LGL34C using Tapatalk
This is deeply disturbing. How do we use BitShares 2.0 with privacy, this being the case?
What is being done to preserve privacy in the system?
Will smart contract or turing completeness be added into Bitshare2.0 in the future?Bts is already a smart contract platform (since cfds are kind of smart)
Bts is already a smart contract platform (since cfds are kind of smart)
as for turing completeness: who knows .. mayve someone is already working on a proposal to upgrade the protocol
Did you mean that users can program their own custom contracts in this platform like in Ethereum?In theory yes .. but you need shareholder approval to get your contracts running ... it's not as easy as in ethereum since you need to construct your contracts on protocol level ... while in ethereum there is a separated "programming level"