Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - JonnyB

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 43
196
General Discussion / Changes I think Openledger needs
« on: November 21, 2016, 11:23:53 am »
1. Brand Clarity
Openledger.info is not the best domain name. It should be openledger.com also it should link directly to the dex not to a site explaining all the other ico projects ccedk is involved in.
Theres currently 4 domains involved and its messy. ccedk.com, openledger.info, obits.io, bitshares.openledger.info
Info about Openledger/obits should be contained within the dex under a separate header menu tab called home.

2. UIAs
It is confusing to have both TRADE.X and OPEN.X available as coin deposit options.  Only Openledger UIAs should be available.
Poloniex doesn't offer BITSTAMP.X as a gateway and why would it??
The deposit/withdraw page should be more like poloniex with just a list of cryptocoins supported by OL and deposit and withdraw options next to each. (no drop down menus)
Also Obits shouldn't be listed as one of the trade tabs on the exchange page. BTC, USD and BTS are plenty.

3. Login to Openledger
The current method gaining access to and operating a bitshares account maybe technically great but it is just not user friendly.
Nearly every service on the web lets you sign in with a username an password. This is the system people know and understand instinctively and you can't change it if you want people to use your service.  This idea has been around for over a year now but theres been no progress on it, I don't know if it is a front end or backend job but it is essential to attracting and retaining users.

4. Market Making
Openledgers UIA offerings are great but theres no liquidity on them. You need market making/ arbitrage bots that can copy the order books from other exchanges and provide liquidity. @alt has a MM bot that could help with this. 


5. Account Page
Simplify the account page, I suggest.
- Display all open orders on the account page.
- Remove the vertical menu. Or toggle it as closed by default.

197
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: November 19, 2016, 02:25:36 pm »
By the way, the bot works like charm. Very easy to use and it actually makes profit. This is amazing!

Edit: YAY, I see total values in balances! This client is improving at impressive pace!


This is impressive and developing rapidly. This is exciting precisely because liquidity is bitshares biggest issue, this will allow many people to provide liquidity and become market makers.  More people need to know about it, Maybe I will make a demonstration video to show others how to use it. If everyone put $500 towards the Market Maker Bots then maybe bitusd would be liquid enough to be useful.

Yeah, this is better than market making pool.

Don't forget to show positive 28 days trade balance number in your video :)

I only started using it this week.

198
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: November 19, 2016, 01:33:12 pm »
By the way, the bot works like charm. Very easy to use and it actually makes profit. This is amazing!

Edit: YAY, I see total values in balances! This client is improving at impressive pace!


This is impressive and developing rapidly. This is exciting precisely because liquidity is bitshares biggest issue, this will allow many people to provide liquidity and become market makers.  More people need to know about it, Maybe I will make a demonstration video to show others how to use it. If everyone put $500 towards the Market Maker Bots then maybe bitusd would be liquid enough to be useful.

199
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: November 17, 2016, 04:44:12 pm »
1. BTS/smart coin/open.btc liked UIA, the price source come from main exchange like polo, btc38, okcoin, after some filter algorithm, it's used by my mm bots exchange.btsbots for a long time.
2. other asset, price source come from blockchain wallet market's filled history, some market is lack of liquidity, so the price is not much reliable.

Quote
buy at price/1.01, sell at price*1.02

What is the reference price?

Thanks for building this MM Bot. It's great for the less technical amongst us and can really help bootstrap liquidity. I've been playing with it a lot today.
My only issue is the non transparent reference point. Why can't it be the same as the feed price from witnesses?

200
General Discussion / Another cryptonomex spin off?
« on: November 05, 2016, 01:32:42 am »
What is Stan Larimer referring to in this steemit post? Is it yet another graphene chain? Does it compete with bitshares or steemit?

https://steemit.com/bitshares/@Stan/the-fourth-guy-fawkes-day-in-bitshares-steemit-history

201
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: October 28, 2016, 01:31:17 pm »
nice  :)

202
1. Stick with Buyback and burn.

but maybe do more of the buyback with OPEN.BTC

203
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: September 26, 2016, 02:39:21 am »
There is a lot of understandable confusion with the browser being your wallet.
I think a priority should be to make openledger behave more like a centralised exchange.
I mean if I just know my user name "jonnybitcoin" surely that should be enough to get to my account which is password protected. Why can't my .bin backup be stored online?
Being able to log in and out of a bitshares account on any computer like other exchanges should be our priority. 
Having your wallet stored in your cookies cache doesn't seem secure even if it is.
This feature was discussed by BM 6 months ago and I think there might have been talk that @datasecuritynode  Peerplays  project was building this feature?

GUI Market Organisation
This has very recently improved as you''ll see openledger assets no longer have the OPEN. prefix and the number of trade tabs have been reduced.


204
General Discussion / Re: [Video] Bitshares Inflation Rate
« on: September 15, 2016, 05:16:47 pm »
voted for  +5%

good to see someone actually making use of the worker proposals

205
General Discussion / Facebook ad campaign results:
« on: September 15, 2016, 09:45:08 am »
Please read the details on steemit: JonnyBitcoin[/member]/results-from-bitshares-facebook-ad-campaign]https://steemit.com/bitshares/@JonnyBitcoin/results-from-bitshares-facebook-ad-campaign


206
General Discussion / Re: telegram channel issue.
« on: September 13, 2016, 11:05:10 am »
I'm back.

Don't know why or how but I'm back.  Didn't do anything differently but it allowed me to join the group again. :-)

207
General Discussion / Re: telegram channel issue.
« on: September 13, 2016, 07:58:29 am »
I'm still locked out from the telegram group since it was turned in to a supergroup.

This is the error I get:

Method: messages.sendMessage
Url: N/A
Result: {"_":"rpc_error","error_code":400,"error_message":"PEER_ID_INVALID"}
Stack: Error
    at Object.h [as invokeApi] (https://web.telegram.org/js/app.js:23:25735)
    at Z.l.send (https://web.telegram.org/js/app.js:29:5996)
    at n (https://web.telegram.org/js/app.js:2:17056)

208
This is an exciting index fund, very impressive.

I love your dedication to multiple witness feeds because as you say nobody will invest big money if prices rely on a single person.

I hope you invest in a short asset name for it.
 


209
General Discussion / telegram channel issue.
« on: August 28, 2016, 03:26:27 pm »
After the bitshares telegram group got turned into a supergroup, I couldn't find it and still can't anyone else got this issue?


210
General Discussion / Why Steem might actually make sense as a Smartcoin
« on: August 21, 2016, 07:17:37 pm »
I'm going to assume you already understand how bts smartcoins work in this post. AKA bitassets AKA MPAs

I think creating BitSteem would make alot of sense as a smartcoin.
Firstly because of the natural synergys between the bitshares and steemit users but more importantly this would be a bit asset that many people would actually want to short.

Whales with vested SP might want to hedge their large positions by shorting steem.
Someone who wanted to power down their SP over 2 years could be guaranteed a fixed payout if shorted correctly
When people call Steem a scam you can suggest they put their money where their mouth is and short it.
The issue with BitUSD, BitGold, etc is it is only created when theres a trader willing to short it into existence so the supply has been limited so far.
I think there would be a good supply and decent liquidity of BitSteem because of an appetite to short from traders.

I've also posted this on steemit if you wanna give me some upvote love:

https://steemit.com/bitshares/@JonnyBitcoin/why-steem-might-actually-make-sense-as-a-smartcoin

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 43