The low pay delegates especially need vetting as they are placed under a lot less scrutiny than 100% delegates (for good reason, but if every 3% delegate was run by the same person it would be a completely centralised system). All the 100% are either from the original team, have verified their uniqueness by talking on mumble, or are producing tangible work. They still may need reminding to produce reports though.
The low pay delegates are more of a risk, 1 person could control dozens of low pay delegates at the moment. We need all delegates vetted so we can at the very least know which delegates are being run by people who claim to be unique individuals. Then more scrutiny can be placed on finding out if that is true or not.