1
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Muse - Claim Balance Button Dimmed
« on: August 09, 2017, 04:00:19 am »
Never mind. When I came back a few hours later the Claim balance button had been enabled.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The wallet is the worst piece of software I had the misfortune to use in my whole life; and that includes any virus or trojan which made its way onto my computer. I had given up long back and my BTS was lying on Bter when the hack happened. After spending sleepless nights the exchange came back and recently again disabled withdrawals. So I finally decided to give it another try, and it got stuck at 44%. I deleted and tried again and it keeps getting stuck. I restart and it goes a bit again and gets stuck again, and finally its at 57% and not moving forward.
I am done with this junk. Before anyone starts complaining about my hardware I have 4 GB of RAM and I run multiple memory intensive programs without a hitch, but apparently its no good for this. I can't take the risk of exchanges going down and me losing everything, so best to keep BTC. Maybe someday I will get BTS again when I can actually run this thing.
IMHO the only motivation to tag it "experimental" is that there are no unit-tests to make sure EVERYTHING works as expected. I would consider it secure assuming your computer is secured
I am pretty sure that you will be able to import the "brain key" into 2.0 easily.
Yes, that is what I was referring to. It works fine for me, at least for transferring balances. But perhaps we can find out from one of the devs why it's considered "experimental". Is it unstable? Is it not secure? What functionality does it lack? And lastly, will balances in this web wallet transfer over to 2.0? Thanks in advance.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't understand why this conversation is taking place considering a) there is currently an end-user web wallet available,
Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't understand why this conversation is taking place considering a) there is currently an end-user web wallet available,
b) Bitshares 2.0 will launch with a new web wallet, and c) Bitshares 2.0 will offer incentives for 3rd parties to create additional end-user wallets with their own value adds, and we know that Bitsapphire among others have already made headway along these lines.
Please feel free to enlighten me if I'm missing something, but making an issue out of end-user wallet availability seems like either being negative for the sake of being negative, or just short-sighted.