136
MemoryCoin / Re: OpenEx compromised
« on: January 14, 2014, 02:29:41 pm »Quote
include("pages/".$_GET["page"].".php");
Where is the 'unsee that' button?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
include("pages/".$_GET["page"].".php");
Yes, there is the latest one on the site, I have made a copy just in case: http://mmcdl.1gh.com/mc2-1gh-win-1.1.zip
Mon Jan 13 22:20:17 2014 Worker 1 hpm 10.260213 wpm 9.828709 A/R/T 50/11/3 -> RPC result: Rejected
Mon Jan 13 22:20:21 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.521191 wpm 22.096073 A/R/T 85/14/0 -> RPC result: Accepted
Mon Jan 13 22:20:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.526758 wpm 22.098413 A/R/T 86/14/0 -> RPC result: Accepted
Since there is no reject reason printed after 'Rejected', you are most certainly running not the latest version of miner, please redownload from the frontpage.
Thanks, but I just downloaded it again (from a different browser, so no cache), it's the same 1/8/14 file and still has no status code after rejects. Are you sure the most recent version is on the site?
Mon Jan 13 22:20:17 2014 Worker 1 hpm 10.260213 wpm 9.828709 A/R/T 50/11/3 -> RPC result: Rejected
Mon Jan 13 22:20:21 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.521191 wpm 22.096073 A/R/T 85/14/0 -> RPC result: Accepted
Mon Jan 13 22:20:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.526758 wpm 22.098413 A/R/T 86/14/0 -> RPC result: Accepted
That is incredibly slow indeed, especially since there are reports of 6990 yielding over 2000. Have you also tried Nvidia by any chance?QuoteMon Jan 13 22:46:22 2014 Worker 0-0 cpm 33.093466 hpm 15.273640 queue in/out 8/0 A/R/T 1/0/0 -> RPC result: Accepted
Mon Jan 13 22:46:53 2014 Worker 0-0 cpm 39.553344 hpm 15.381736 queue in/out 8/0 A/R/T 2/0/0 -> RPC result: Accepted
On a Radeon HD6950 - very, very slow..
This one does not depend on architecture a lot, it is the number of memory controllers and VRAM speed that counts most. 6970 performs close to 7970.How is that possible? My 7870 only does 650 CPM.
Because they are dual gpu cards, and my two 6970s get around 2.3k so he's not lying.
Or the miner is not optimized to work with GCN design, those hash seem to be way too high compared to the new generation cards, even with dual gpu shouldn't be such a huge diference ...
how to set parameter ,I want use less GPU ,my gpu 3G RAM when I open MMC gpu miner,I can't do anythings else!You cannot, MMC algorithm is much more demanding than PTS. The GPU does not have a chance to 'rest' between tasks and let you do something else on your PC.
But when I open pts gpu miner,also I can use computer to do other things
@reorderYes, as soon as I can get hold of 6xxx and debug there. May take several days.
the PTS-miner works very fine on my HD6990 with ~1200 cpm/GPU or ~2400 cpm for the complete card(s) with about 60 % power consumption compared to scrypt-mining - great work!
but the MMC-miner does not work with this 6990 - only rejections of the shares?
is there a planned update of the mmc-miner?
Works with all cards amd or nvidiaJust run it as 'pts-miner YOUR-ADDRESS 0-0' or 'pts-miner YOUR-ADDRESS 1-0'
but I saw only the primary card works (device 0).
My pc have 2 cards, how to run miner for the 2nd card (device 1)?
Is there an option "-d 1" or "-g 1" ?
Got the same on my AMD 6850This error is most likely caused by lacking system RAM, especially in Windows with multi-card setups. It could also mean that there is not enough free VRAM on the card.Code: [Select]
PTSHasher:0-1 initialized on platform AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, device Barts, vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., mem: 1073741824
Exception in thread Thread-1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 551, in __bootstrap_inner
class _Event(_Verbose):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 504, in run
File "miner.py", line 1514, in miner.miner_thread (miner.c:8787)
File "miner.py", line 1509, in miner.Miner.loop (miner.c:8666)
File "miner.py", line 1497, in miner.Miner.iterate (miner.c:8488)
File "miner.py", line 1256, in miner.PTSHasher.processMidstate (miner.c:3834)
MemoryError: clEnqueueNDRangeKernel failed: mem object allocation failure
This one is particularly weird, as Nvidia OpenCL first tells the miner what worksize to enqueue the kernel with, and then fails to do it with this very value. Any chance it is an outdated driver version that you could upgrade?got a err with 780TIDo you perhaps have too low free system RAM?
I have 16gb ram
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I can port it for you, no problem, but only tomorrow. Just tell, 32bit or 64?Thought as much.. If it were open source, I'd try and port it out..Has anyone got the Linux binary running on Debian 7?On the moment, you cannot: it depends on specific Ubuntu libc version.