Outstanding items after the 2.0 transition

[cass]

also polished head a bit and added Wallet to top nav ...

[cass]

for future relate issus just use the repo on git

thanks, cass
I haven't thought of this but that's a good idea - I'll use it next time.

done

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares.github.io/commit/5acda87108d329f0ec57cc359a4d0dd71b0faae0

[jakub]

for future relate issus just use the repo on git

thanks, cass
I haven't thought of this but that's a good idea - I'll use it next time.

[cass]

I have these proposals regarding https://bitshares.org/

(1) Change the Block Explorer link from the defunct http://bitsharesblocks.com/ to roadscape's http://cryptofresh.com/
(It's still alpha quality but already very useful)

(2) Remove the Wiki link pointing to the outdated wiki page http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/Main_Page

(3) Add Documentation link pointing to http://docs.bitshares.eu/
(It seems we have this high-quality documentation compiled by xeroc but it's not being promoted by the official website - why?)

EDIT: Actually there is a link to http://docs.bitshares.eu/ in the download section but still a link to the documentation should be clearly displayed in the footer together with other links.

thx will do today

for future relate issus just use the repo on git

[jakub]

I have these proposals regarding https://bitshares.org/

(1) Change the Block Explorer link from the defunct http://bitsharesblocks.com/ to roadscape's http://cryptofresh.com/
(It's still alpha quality but already very useful)

(2) Remove the Wiki link pointing to the outdated wiki page http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/Main_Page

(3) Add Documentation link pointing to http://docs.bitshares.eu/
(It seems we have this high-quality documentation compiled by xeroc but it's not being promoted by the official website - why?)

EDIT: Actually there is a link to http://docs.bitshares.eu/ in the download section but still a link to the documentation should be clearly displayed in the footer together with other links.

[svk]

I've moved bitsharesblocks to legacy.bitsharesblocks.com, the old domain might be available a little longer but should propagate soon enough.

I still can't get the website working locally so I'm unable to actually update it, it's really frustrating.. I'll try to put up a basic 2.0 explorer asap.

[liondani]

(2) Why is the Metaexchange delegate (dev-metaexchange.monsterer) still producing blocks on the old BTS blockchain?
@monsterer

I just didn't get a chance to shut it down yet - I'll get on it

no comments

[jakub]

I wanted to put a warning up but couldn't get the website build working for some strange reason, either its an npm or lineman version issue or something, but bottom line is I spent several hours trying to get it working and couldn't. I'll have another go from my work computer tomorrow.

Thank you, svk. I do understand you've been quite busy lately.

Maybe the easiest option will be to take it down completely until you have time to migrate it to 2.0.
Does anybody need this site as it is now?

[svk]

I wanted to put a warning up but couldn't get the website build working for some strange reason, either its an npm or lineman version issue or something, but bottom line is I spent several hours trying to get it working and couldn't. I'll have another go from my work computer tomorrow.

[jakub]

And I think it would be really nice if we could have the road-map updated
https://bitshares.org/roadmap/

If I were new to BTS and considered investing - this is exactly where I would look before making a decision.
And it would be really hard for me to make a positive decision after looking at a road-map like the one we're having now.

The results of this poll could be converted into an attractive road-map:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19178.0.html

[jakub]

@svk
Just as a reminder, we still have http://bitsharesblocks.com/ running without any warning and our official page pointing to it.

Things like this hurt our image.

[monsterer]

(2) Why is the Metaexchange delegate (dev-metaexchange.monsterer) still producing blocks on the old BTS blockchain?
@monsterer

I just didn't get a chance to shut it down yet - I'll get on it

[Thom]

Sure looks like you're right jakub. I was only looking at the delegates page, which is clearly in error.

[xeroc]

Code: [Select]

3832238 2015-10-21T10:51:00 dac.bts500                      0       166     0       0.116888         a94d9b0eeed161c2339621127dcb8c71a441650d
3832237 2015-10-21T10:49:10 eur.bts500                      0       166     0       0.078991         6b41b0dac94e7764b9fd5738c50179a45be87698
3832236 2015-10-21T10:47:50 dev-metaexchange.monsterer      0       166     0       0.024612         ae2ea96735627193fce1960893a5d72b9b3ff68e
3832235 2015-10-21T10:46:10 usd.bts500                      0       166     0       0.081288         087c5f2a91236ee04138b51d331531c94995bcb6
3832234 2015-10-21T10:45:00 cny.bts500                      7       13796   1       0.848169         05637881a7678f5e66d82f4258c857de36aba5e6


[jakub]

Are you sure about that? bsb also reports verbaltech still has active feeds but I stopped all BTS1 activity by 10:30AM CDT 10-13-15.

This is what the bitsharesblocks page indicates:
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks