76
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Early 2nd quarter 2016 update
« on: May 28, 2016, 04:49:25 pm »
no update
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
well , it translates the same in Chinese at least . "learn from bitshares' failures " = "learn from the reasons why bitshares has failed "AGS fund was wasted dry
i'm sure if his English could be better he'd use the word "mistakes" instead of "failures" .
Anyway , he's right about one sentence : technology can not fix dumb people .
The difference between DAO and BTS is that , BTS didn't have a 6 million USD budget in the first place , it's just in BM's imagination . The dilution plan was accepted reluctantly by the community only because of :
1. BM will perform some big thing with vote , millions of users will be using BTS , hence any reputation cost by the merger and continue dilution could be compensated .
2. Upon the delivery of 2.0 , BM magically proposed that to unleash the delegate-by-delegate dilution to worker dilution , with a misleading promise that all dilution will be vested for years , no selling pressure .
After the two promises were broken , he still convinced that he has 6 million budget to spend . This is what I called "wishful thinking" .
Anyway , I don't believe the future holds for The DAO . But what BM said regarding the "failures" of BItShares and blame it on "dumb people" are just plain stupid .
By the way , how's brownie.pts going ? As far as we know , nobody is controlling brownie.pts except BM . He can dilute it to support development . How come brownie.pts hasn't been successful already
Still waiting for BM to acknowledge my post: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22317.msg292330.html#msg292330
Publicly FUD BTS, Pump the premined Steemit, then merge BTS as a minority stake into Steemit?! Hodling is becoming increasingly difficult, feeling like sunk cost fallacy the lower we go
big thing 2.0I think the future is pretty clear for BTS:
1. work out the kinks with Steem
2. merge best parts of steem + BTS into a next generation DEX
3. sharedrop + dev allocation
It is just a much longer roadmap.
How can Steem "a social media platform where everyone gets paid for creating and curating content." be meaningfully merged with BTS? The two seem completely unrelated ..
It's a shame you seem to feel the need to switch direction every few months BM. I like your vision (or should it be: "the previous vision"?) and certaintly you have the skills to pull it off, but appear to lack the tenacity to see the project through to the end.
I don't know how it went from "fuck the banks we don't need them anymore and lets build financial freedom together" to "lets pay people for blogging"..
Pretty easy really. Got to make payroll and put food on the table.
Funny how few people there are in this world who understand what it's like to be responsible to the shareholders and employees of a company.
That's what I told the DNS victims ..........
I guess someday there will be people telling STEEM holders that exact same line
It's not cool for BM to blame the community or "dumb people" for the "mistakes" of BTS, instead of thinking of his own mistake for not fully discussing with community when he made those big decisions.
not cool at all .
I can not explain enough to people without wasting my time why bitshares' founder has announced the "bitshares' failures" .
after all , a large part of BM's own mistakes wasn't even mentioned in the article . I had to teach them the history over and over again until they realized : oh , it's BM who failed , not bitshares , and it seems STEEM is not something we should remotely consider to invest in given the history .