Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 69
691
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] winex.witness
« on: January 20, 2018, 03:48:49 pm »
Quote from: win.neil on January 20, 2018, 10:44:04 am
Quote from: Customminer on January 20, 2018, 12:00:55 am
Quote from: win.neil on January 19, 2018, 04:46:31 pm
Quote from: Customminer on January 19, 2018, 02:33:52 pm
What are your plans for publishing market pegged asset price feeds?

We have tested the test network and the price feeds is ready.

This is our price feed test which is modified from alt’s script.

Are these price feed scripts open source? Would you consider providing price feeds for HERO and Hertz?

yes, the script is open source.   https://github.com/pch957/btsprice
We may consider offering a price for HERO and hertz， you can introduce the HERO and Hertz first, thank you.
Cool, I'll investigate integrating HERTZ into this price feed script. https://github.com/pch957/btsprice/issues/4

Looking at some of the forks, there are some interesting proposed changes worth looking into:
https://github.com/crazybits/btsprice/commits/master
https://github.com/kimziv/btsprice/commits/master
https://github.com/xiangxn/btsprice/commits/master

Do you know how many active/backup witnesses use this price feed repo? Cheers  +5%

692
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Request] Increase the maximum_asset_feed_publishers value from 10
« on: January 20, 2018, 12:11:45 am »
Quote from: Brekyrself on January 19, 2018, 01:26:29 am
Quote from: xeroc on January 17, 2018, 10:35:32 am
Quote from: Customminer on January 16, 2018, 02:34:51 pm
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?
Sure, one can propose the change already .. I just don't know why majority of committee members don't even reply to the request :-( .. not sure if they would approve it .. Frustrating to see so little activity from committee members (other than bhuz and bunkerchainlabs)

Can we build something into the UI where members will receive a yes/no vote option to proposals?  Information is scattered everywhere and it would be nice to see what members are quick to take action.

It might encourage people to campaign for such committee roles & perhaps speed up the modification of global variables if configurable within the Bitshares UI.

I've enquired about this idea: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1045

Looking forwards to this passing  +5%

693
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] winex.witness
« on: January 20, 2018, 12:00:55 am »
Quote from: win.neil on January 19, 2018, 04:46:31 pm
Quote from: Customminer on January 19, 2018, 02:33:52 pm
What are your plans for publishing market pegged asset price feeds?

We have tested the test network and the price feeds is ready.

This is our price feed test which is modified from alt’s script.

Are these price feed scripts open source? Would you consider providing price feeds for HERO and Hertz?

694
General Discussion / Re: What projects did ICO in bitshares so far?
« on: January 19, 2018, 11:29:17 pm »
The smoke network did their Pre-ICO on Bitshares.

695
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] winex.witness
« on: January 19, 2018, 02:33:52 pm »
What are your plans for publishing market pegged asset price feeds?

696
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Request] Increase the maximum_asset_feed_publishers value from 10
« on: January 19, 2018, 12:54:12 am »
Quote from: xeroc on January 17, 2018, 10:35:32 am
Quote from: Customminer on January 16, 2018, 02:34:51 pm
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?
Sure, one can propose the change already .. I just don't know why majority of committee members don't even reply to the request :-( .. not sure if they would approve it .. Frustrating to see so little activity from committee members (other than bhuz and bunkerchainlabs)
Can you propose such a change through the GUI? Or is it a CLI only action?

697
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: January 18, 2018, 11:11:58 pm »
Created a price feed script HTML page for Hertz: https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/home

698
General Discussion / Re: Delegates Please Publish Feeds More Often
« on: January 18, 2018, 08:55:48 pm »
Quote from: biophil on January 17, 2018, 03:33:41 pm
Quote from: Customminer on January 17, 2018, 11:09:53 am
Would it also not be worth increasing the max force settle volume per 24hrs? If it's set to 1% and someone has a margin call greater than 1%, perhaps the DEX couldn't clear the margin call fast enough?

I agree that max force settle volume is WAY too low. But I sort of assumed it didn't affect margin calls.

FWIW, the DEX doesn't clear margin calls -- the traders do. A possibly-bigger problem is the max short-squeeze ratio is only 110%, which means that margin calls are not very aggressive and traders don't have much incentive to buy into the margin call. I suppose USD will probably black-swan today because of it. A very serious problem is that Bitshares is too shorter-friendly, at the expense of people who hold the supposedly risk-free bitassets.

What would the effect of changing the max short-squeeze ratio be specifically? Would you desire it increase of decreased? All committee controlled assets use 110%

699
General Discussion / Re: Cryptofresh Block Explorer + MUSE now available
« on: January 17, 2018, 11:43:19 pm »
I too see 'Node replay in progress'.

Bear in mind there are the following alternative block explorers:
http://open-explorer.io/
http://bitshares-explorer.io/
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/

700
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: January 17, 2018, 11:25:25 am »
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-71-activated-on-the-bitshares-network-2-more-witnesses-to-go

We're up to 5 of the 7 required witnesses now! Getting close to activation!

701
General Discussion / Re: Delegates Please Publish Feeds More Often
« on: January 17, 2018, 11:09:53 am »
Would it also not be worth increasing the max force settle volume per 24hrs? If it's set to 1% and someone has a margin call greater than 1%, perhaps the DEX couldn't clear the margin call fast enough?

702
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: January 16, 2018, 11:48:21 pm »
Updated the reference Hertz price feed script:
  • Updated rate calculation
  • Code cleanup - moving code around & changing comments.
https://github.com/BTS-CM/scripts/blob/master/hertz-feed.py

Updated the HUG REST API function:
  • Stop crashing due to non-publishing manually configured private price feed publishers.
  • Inherited the hertz-feed updated formulas.
  • Showing more info in the
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_hertz_value?api_key=123abc

703
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: January 16, 2018, 06:25:08 pm »

704
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Request] Increase the maximum_asset_feed_publishers value from 10
« on: January 16, 2018, 02:34:51 pm »
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?

705
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares HUG REST API
« on: January 15, 2018, 07:05:23 pm »
Many updates to the HUG REST API since the original post. Most recently, a Bitshares testnet HUG REST API server was created! https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/bitshares-testnet-hug-rest-api-server-now-online

Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 69

Page created in 0.197 seconds with 23 queries.