0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: clayop on October 04, 2015, 05:59:29 amimpressive
delegate.btsnow is out
Quote from: svk on October 09, 2015, 07:49:59 pmHow long is it gonna run for? Just had to stop working on the GUI due to this because it's killing my witness_node... 1 hour... Sorry about that
How long is it gonna run for? Just had to stop working on the GUI due to this because it's killing my witness_node...
100 TPS / 1 hour test will take place at 10/8 18:00 UTC (14:00 EST, 11:00 PST)
Quote from: clayop on October 07, 2015, 09:35:46 pmSome inits seems to be forked.Actually all of them.
Some inits seems to be forked.
Quote from: fuzzy on October 07, 2015, 05:45:19 amQuote from: tonyk on October 07, 2015, 05:22:17 amQuote from: puppies on October 07, 2015, 03:29:07 amIf there was a way of preventing a witness node from sharing any blocks other than the block they just produced, I think we could reduce the network lag that seems to be the issue with higher tps.Said another way. If a witness node only had to worry about receiving transactions, receiving blocks, and broadcasting a block on there turn would it reduce the performance requirements enough to make it worth the changes?Cool, other than nodes doing that, will make them a prime targets for a ddos attack...There are ways to mitigate DDoS attacks that I am certain the best and brightest will be utilizing now and inn coming years. I definitely have mixed fillings on the term 'inn coming' ...especially when combined with 'the best'
Quote from: tonyk on October 07, 2015, 05:22:17 amQuote from: puppies on October 07, 2015, 03:29:07 amIf there was a way of preventing a witness node from sharing any blocks other than the block they just produced, I think we could reduce the network lag that seems to be the issue with higher tps.Said another way. If a witness node only had to worry about receiving transactions, receiving blocks, and broadcasting a block on there turn would it reduce the performance requirements enough to make it worth the changes?Cool, other than nodes doing that, will make them a prime targets for a ddos attack...There are ways to mitigate DDoS attacks that I am certain the best and brightest will be utilizing now and inn coming years.
Quote from: puppies on October 07, 2015, 03:29:07 amIf there was a way of preventing a witness node from sharing any blocks other than the block they just produced, I think we could reduce the network lag that seems to be the issue with higher tps.Said another way. If a witness node only had to worry about receiving transactions, receiving blocks, and broadcasting a block on there turn would it reduce the performance requirements enough to make it worth the changes?Cool, other than nodes doing that, will make them a prime targets for a ddos attack...
If there was a way of preventing a witness node from sharing any blocks other than the block they just produced, I think we could reduce the network lag that seems to be the issue with higher tps.Said another way. If a witness node only had to worry about receiving transactions, receiving blocks, and broadcasting a block on there turn would it reduce the performance requirements enough to make it worth the changes?
I think web-wallet server should be upgraded
Quote from: clayop on October 05, 2015, 09:24:26 pmSorry I made a mistake. The test will start in 50 min (22:10 UTC)
Sorry I made a mistake. The test will start in 50 min (22:10 UTC)
eagerly waiting...
Did your spam kill the testnet network?Good work!
From the third stress test (spamming) I decided to post the report on a separate thread.3rd Test Plan: - Time: 2015/10/1 00:00 UTC- Duration: 30 min- Number of VPS Used: 67- Parameter: Using Xeroc's python script. Interval 1, 10 txs (= 10 tps per each vps)- Goal: 500 tps