0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Why not just add different levels here in this forum? You could have, a sub forum for verified stake holders, whales, and all levels in between. Couldn't you just sign a transaction with an account key, or transfer to an address with a certain memo to prove ownership? After that it shouldn't be too hard to automatically check that balance once per day, and give the account appropriate permissions.
I used the 'manual method' in the past, then fav told me that it doesn't work. Today I thought possibly something had changed so it might work now but, as fav said again, it still doesn't work - I got no notification about your mention of me. I think you'll find that nobody you've mentioned has been notified @Tuck Fheman
Quote from: hadrian on September 25, 2015, 04:00:09 pm@Tuck Fheman - does this notify you?@hadrian no that's not my forum id #. but whoever is user 8741 probably got notified. Quote from: hadrian on September 25, 2015, 04:00:09 pmIs this what you mean by:QuoteI have to manually enter the member number bbcode to mention someone?YesQuote from: hadrian on September 25, 2015, 04:00:09 pmAre you sure your mentions are working? Would you like to try it with me?I have no clue (assumed it did) if it works when I manually add them, did you get mine above?
@Tuck Fheman - does this notify you?
Is this what you mean by:QuoteI have to manually enter the member number bbcode to mention someone?
I have to manually enter the member number bbcode to mention someone
Are you sure your mentions are working? Would you like to try it with me?
Quote from: fav on September 25, 2015, 07:51:49 amcould someone other than mod/admin test the mention function please? looks like it works for normal users@Tuck Fheman @bulletproofIt notifies me fine.I have to manually enter the member number bbcode to mention someone, if that matters.
could someone other than mod/admin test the mention function please? looks like it works for normal users@Tuck Fheman @bulletproof
Quote from: CryptoPrometheus on September 03, 2015, 04:22:58 pmQuote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:21:33 pmQuote from: DataSecurityNode on September 03, 2015, 12:18:35 pmQuote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:13:10 pmQuote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pmwell for trying to help us "simple" users @fav level wise of course but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<We have avoided doing much with forums at dposhub specifically because bitsharestalk already exists and we are not looking to compete with the type of talk that goes on here... . are you suggesting there should be another space for bitshares only stakeholders?a bit OT but it would be perfectly legit to have a "private" forum for stakeholders, and DPOSHUB is the right place. in 2.0 you can easily proof that you are one. entry level 100k or something. I would welcome this.Is there a way to automatically confirm the balance of any account without the account holder manually participating in some way? For this idea ^^ to work, we would have to continually update/confirm that the balance still exists & belongs to the particular account holder every time the account holder logs in to DposHub. And obviously we don't want users to have to "lock up" a large balance in order to participate. I'm not sure how this could technically be accomplished, but I would love to hear suggestions!I like the concept of having a forum restricted to BTS holders with a particular level of reserves, but I think that most whales will probably keep their balances in a blinded account, and use a proxy for voting and day to day transactions. An alternative (one we have been seriously considering) is to have a forum restricted to BTS "lifetime membership" accounts. Perhaps it won't be as exclusive as a "balance-based" membership, but I think it could be an effective way to weed out most of the less-than-serious players...If you create such a forum and every wise, informed, mature, rational, shareholding person-of-integrity moves there, who will be left here to greet the newbies and defend them from the foul FUDslinging trolls?Quote"Fallen! Fallen is BitSharestalk the Great!' She has become a dwelling for demons and a haunt for every impure spirit, a haunt for every unclean bird, a haunt for every unclean and detestable animal."Kind of like the altcoin subforum at bitcointalk, now that I mention it...
Quote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:21:33 pmQuote from: DataSecurityNode on September 03, 2015, 12:18:35 pmQuote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:13:10 pmQuote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pmwell for trying to help us "simple" users @fav level wise of course but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<We have avoided doing much with forums at dposhub specifically because bitsharestalk already exists and we are not looking to compete with the type of talk that goes on here... . are you suggesting there should be another space for bitshares only stakeholders?a bit OT but it would be perfectly legit to have a "private" forum for stakeholders, and DPOSHUB is the right place. in 2.0 you can easily proof that you are one. entry level 100k or something. I would welcome this.Is there a way to automatically confirm the balance of any account without the account holder manually participating in some way? For this idea ^^ to work, we would have to continually update/confirm that the balance still exists & belongs to the particular account holder every time the account holder logs in to DposHub. And obviously we don't want users to have to "lock up" a large balance in order to participate. I'm not sure how this could technically be accomplished, but I would love to hear suggestions!I like the concept of having a forum restricted to BTS holders with a particular level of reserves, but I think that most whales will probably keep their balances in a blinded account, and use a proxy for voting and day to day transactions. An alternative (one we have been seriously considering) is to have a forum restricted to BTS "lifetime membership" accounts. Perhaps it won't be as exclusive as a "balance-based" membership, but I think it could be an effective way to weed out most of the less-than-serious players...
Quote from: DataSecurityNode on September 03, 2015, 12:18:35 pmQuote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:13:10 pmQuote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pmwell for trying to help us "simple" users @fav level wise of course but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<We have avoided doing much with forums at dposhub specifically because bitsharestalk already exists and we are not looking to compete with the type of talk that goes on here... . are you suggesting there should be another space for bitshares only stakeholders?a bit OT but it would be perfectly legit to have a "private" forum for stakeholders, and DPOSHUB is the right place. in 2.0 you can easily proof that you are one. entry level 100k or something. I would welcome this.
Quote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:13:10 pmQuote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pmwell for trying to help us "simple" users @fav level wise of course but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<We have avoided doing much with forums at dposhub specifically because bitsharestalk already exists and we are not looking to compete with the type of talk that goes on here... . are you suggesting there should be another space for bitshares only stakeholders?
Quote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pmwell for trying to help us "simple" users @fav level wise of course but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<
well for trying to help us "simple" users @fav
"Fallen! Fallen is BitSharestalk the Great!' She has become a dwelling for demons and a haunt for every impure spirit, a haunt for every unclean bird, a haunt for every unclean and detestable animal."
Quote from: Stan on September 03, 2015, 05:42:52 pm"Fallen! Fallen is BitSharestalk the Great!' She has become a dwelling for demons and a haunt for every impure spirit, a haunt for every unclean bird, a haunt for every unclean and detestable animal."the Mighty Voice has spoken. Why not leave Babylon bitsharestalk be for now, see what forum-like communication (if any) is needed on DPOSHUB after launch and consider changes thereafter?
Quote from: Empirical1.2 on September 03, 2015, 02:42:41 pmI've toyed with a similar idea but for a higher amount and entry only being allowed to those who have never been paid by the blockchain to avoid conflicts of interest.Interesting. A Continental Convention of sorts. Freedom of assembly and all that. Let's take the power back! Or at least steer the Bit-Mobile in the right (our) direction. What would you suggest the buy in to be? 500,000? 1 million? 5 million?In order to post or even read messages, you must prove reserves. I like it. It keeps competitors from getting the free lunch of tapping our brains, copying our ideas, etc.. It will help us do the "under promise over deliver" thing because our hype won't be so public. Public hype increases expectations too much I think.Somehow, I think that factions will develop automatically and spontaneously just as you predict.
I've toyed with a similar idea but for a higher amount and entry only being allowed to those who have never been paid by the blockchain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Quote from: CryptoPrometheus on September 03, 2015, 04:22:58 pmQuote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:21:33 pmQuote from: DataSecurityNode on September 03, 2015, 12:18:35 pmQuote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:13:10 pmQuote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pmwell for trying to help us "simple" users @fav level wise of course but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<We have avoided doing much with forums at dposhub specifically because bitsharestalk already exists and we are not looking to compete with the type of talk that goes on here... . are you suggesting there should be another space for bitshares only stakeholders?a bit OT but it would be perfectly legit to have a "private" forum for stakeholders, and DPOSHUB is the right place. in 2.0 you can easily proof that you are one. entry level 100k or something. I would welcome this.Is there a way to automatically confirm the balance of any account without the account holder manually participating in some way? For this idea ^^ to work, we would have to continually update/confirm that the balance still exists & belongs to the particular account holder every time the account holder logs in to DposHub. And obviously we don't want users to have to "lock up" a large balance in order to participate. I'm not sure how this could technically be accomplished, but I would love to hear suggestions!I like the concept of having a forum restricted to BTS holders with a particular level of reserves, but I think that most whales will probably keep their balances in a blinded account, and use a proxy for voting and day to day transactions. An alternative (one we have been seriously considering) is to have a forum restricted to BTS "lifetime membership" accounts. Perhaps it won't be as exclusive as a "balance-based" membership, but I think it could be an effective way to weed out most of the less-than-serious players...If you create such a forum and every wise, informed, mature, rational, shareholding person-of-integrity moves there, who will be left here to greet the newbies and defend them from the foul FUDslinging trolls?Quote"Fallen! Fallen is BitSharestalk the Great!' She has become a dwelling for demons and a haunt for every impure spirit, a haunt for every unclean bird, a haunt for every unclean and detestable animal."
I understand the desire to make it for significant holders.. but in a shareocracy every share counts. I don't see how we can traverse privacy by establishing a list of minimum amount stake holders whole balances we are constantly monitoring daily. All people who are in dposhub will be dpos account holders. We can make it so the forums are not public and you need to login in order to access them.. we could potentially even charge a fee if you are interested in a minimum stake access arrangement. Maybe not 100k, but it could be something reasonable like a one time 10k perhaps or something where not just anybody would want to pay so they can participate? There are other possibilities that don't need to be attached to how many shares you hold, but how much you participate.. earned badges for example for your site activity could after so much has been reached.. then 'unlock' the forums for you to participate.. this seems more equitable to me. What do you think?
Quote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:21:33 pmQuote from: DataSecurityNode on September 03, 2015, 12:18:35 pmQuote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:13:10 pmQuote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pmwell for trying to help us "simple" users @fav level wise of course but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<We have avoided doing much with forums at dposhub specifically because bitsharestalk already exists and we are not looking to compete with the type of talk that goes on here... . are you suggesting there should be another space for bitshares only stakeholders?a bit OT but it would be perfectly legit to have a "private" forum for stakeholders, and DPOSHUB is the right place. in 2.0 you can easily proof that you are one. entry level 100k or something. I would welcome this.^^ I think that is a very good idea.
a bit OT but it would be perfectly legit to have a "private" forum for stakeholders, and DPOSHUB is the right place. in 2.0 you can easily proof that you are one. entry level 100k or something. I would welcome this.
Quote from: DataSecurityNode on September 03, 2015, 11:55:43 amI am thinking maybe only fav sees it because he is an administrator/moderator in the forum and the rest of us are not.huh, great! looks like mentions don't work for simple users@fav @cass
I am thinking maybe only fav sees it because he is an administrator/moderator in the forum and the rest of us are not.
same in FF & Safari - you using IE @fav? Will investigate why this script is blocked/missing
The "u=31" gives me the member number to use in:
@hadrian nope, typing the code "by hand" doesn't trigger the notification
If I put in my post:Code: [Select][member=31]fav[/member]then I get "@fav"This is the format I've been using. Has this notified you fav?For people who can't or won't use scripts, perhaps they could use this method.To get the member number just look for the "u=" in the person's profile page url (you could just hover over their name on a post of theirs).As an example, fav's profile url is:Code: [Select]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31The "u=31" gives me the member number to use in:Code: [Select][member=31]fav[/member]I hope this is all correct and that it makes sense...
[member=31]fav[/member]
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31