Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - merivercap

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 45
166
General Discussion / Re: Trading Contest on the Testnet?
« on: January 26, 2016, 07:07:18 pm »
Awesome idea!
You can even help me test the new bot infrastructure that comes with two easy market making strategies (not well tested, not optimized yet)

https://github.com/xeroc/python-graphenelib/tree/feature/bot-infrastructure/scripts/exchange-bots

Great! Look forward to testing out your bot!

Good idea. I'd like to donate 300 bts for the contest.

Great thx!  You'll trade too right?  It's fun to be able to trade without risk.   You can create a lot of orders and just cancel out without too much concern... You can make mistakes and practice...I'm already a lot more comfortable with the platform after spending just ten/fifteen minutes on the testnet!

167
General Discussion / Trading Contest on the Testnet?
« on: January 25, 2016, 09:52:25 pm »
Hey so @xeroc created a test asset called PEG.FAKEUSD to help me test out some parameters and I thought it might be fun to trade with play money.  PEG.FAKEUSD currently uses a feed from Poloniex trading. 
(Note: Forced settlement is set at 90% , MSSR is roughly 100%, MCR is 175% )

Because:
1) It's easier to trade play money without risk.
2) It's good training for users just like there is simulated trading on many traditional platforms.

Why don't we have a trading contest?  I'll gift $10 worth of BTS in a pool for the winner if 10 others make a pledge to the pool?

Maybe some trading rules:
1) Contest winner is the person with the most TEST from trading PEG.FAKEUSD
2) Contest ends February 29th, midnight ET, US
3) Must trade at least 100 PEG.FAKEUSD per day to qualify.

When you register you get 1,000,000 TEST shares which is about $3,000 PEG.FAKEUSD.  Register at: http://testnet.bitshares.eu/

What do you guys think?  Who's in?


168
General Discussion / Re: [Public Testnet] testnet.bitshares.eu
« on: January 20, 2016, 04:56:00 am »
 +5%

Great job @xeroc!

169
General Discussion / Re: Crowd Donations for Mike Hearn Hangout
« on: January 16, 2016, 06:06:32 am »
I think any news is good news if you get Hearn on... but I also think it's better to reach out to the other side as well.  I think it's more important to get the broader Bitcoin community on board with Bitshares than create more divisiveness.  Hearn is already an outcast and even more so now. 

170
...also I should add  'without going through a financial institution' to the first sentence:

We have described a peer-to-peer payment and monetary asset system that enables users to make payments in assets that are pegged to local currencies [without going through a financial institution.]

171
+5%   :D

Thanks @konelectric !  Let me know if you have any questions.

+5% Great work!  I need to read this again tomorrow and look at it with clear eyes.
The only thing that immediately jumps out to me is the conclusion.

I would say this differently, but I haven't figured out how exactly yet.

Quote
9.  Conclusion

We have described a peer-to-peer payment and monetary asset system that enables users to make payments in assets that are pegged to local currencies.  We start with the framework of Bitcoin and other coin systems that use cryptographic digital signatures to securely transfer ownership.  Bitcoin is currently not widely used as a unit of account and may take many years or decades before it becomes the standard monetary unit of account.  Hence the proposed system provides a framework to enable users to create monetary assets that are pegged to local fiat currencies for more convenient use. The system begins with a delegated-proof-of-stake protocol (DPOS) to allow stakeholders to vote on the operations of the network just like traditional organizations and companies.  DPOS also enables stakeholders to select witness nodes to produce blocks and record the transaction history into the blockchain.  Stakeholders can also create monetary assets that are collateralized by shares in the network and use internal and external exchange prices to value the collateral so each monetary asset remains sufficiently backed over time.

My issues begin with: "We start with the framework of Bitcoin and..." "...may take many years or decades before..." and "the proposed system"

I'd suggest naming the "proposed system" within the document.  The Graphene Toolkit, BitShares, or an effective generic descriptor.  The "proposed system" is somewhat confusing and weaker than need be since the system is in fact operational currently, and that's a majorly strong point, it does exist not just in theory... As demonstrated by, and so forth.

I can't really think clearly about how to reformulate this right now, I'll look again tomorrow, but that's my 2bts.

@lovejoy  Thanks for the feedback!  Yeah that makes sense.  I will remove 'proposed' in the conclusion.  I do understand what you are saying about it being weak without specific names, but I tried to avoid repeating  'Bitshares' many times similar to the way the Bitcoin paper was written.  Satoshi's paper was broad and theoretical and only used Bitcoin in the title so I tried to do the same.  So that is more the academic style I guess.   

I also agree the bolded can be improved. Second sentence is awkward... The third bolded sentence is redundant compared to the very first...  What about:

We have described a peer-to-peer payment and monetary asset system that enables users to make payments in assets that are pegged to local currencies.  We start with the framework of Bitcoin and other [electronic] coin systems that use cryptographic digital signatures to securely transfer ownership.  Bitcoin is currently not widely used as a unit of account and may take many years or decades before it becomes the standard monetary unit of account.  Hence the proposed system provides a framework to enable users to create monetary assets that are pegged to local fiat currencies for more convenient use.  The system begins with adds a delegated-proof-of-stake protocol (DPOS) to allow stakeholders to vote on the operations of the network just like traditional organizations and companies.  DPOS also enables stakeholders to select witness nodes to produce blocks and record the transaction history into the blockchain.  [Finally], stakeholders can also create monetary assets that are collateralized by shares in the network and [that] use internal and external exchange prices to value the collateral so [that] each monetary asset remains sufficiently backed over time.  Therefore, the system offers users stable monetary assets that are pegged to local fiat currencies for convenience.


Let me know if that works better...thx!

172
Hey guys Happy New Year and let's work to make 2016 great! 

I wanted to release a white paper on Bitshares soon and wanted feedback and review.  BM and xeroc have reviewed it and helped make some corrections, but I wanted community feedback to make sure it reads well and don't have any glaring errors.   The main purpose of this whitepaper is to: 1) simplify the technology in a similar style to the Bitcoin whitepaper 2) help influencers and others feel comfortable with the technology.  Let me know what you guys think.  Thanks!  BTW it's only 3.5 pages!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bitshares - A Peer-to-Peer Payment & Monetary Asset System (Whitepaper Draft)

Abstract:  A peer-to-peer system that enables the creation of monetary assets pegged to local currencies can be used as electronic cash for online payments between two people without the need for a financial institution.  Similar to the Bitcoin system digital signatures are used, but instead of proof-of-work a delegated proof-of-stake protocol is used to prevent double-spends and maintain the security of the network.  Similar to how existing corporations and organizations function today, stakeholders vote to determine who the operators of the network are.  Stakeholders vote to determine which particular set of witness nodes can validate transactions on the network and enter a record into the history of transactions called the blockchain.  Double-spends cannot occur because the consensus for valid transactions is between a deterministic set of witness nodes that agree on the order of transactions.  Other non-witness nodes in the protocol can monitor transactions to audit the integrity of the blockchain.  The value of the network system is determined by people’s expectations of future dividends from the revenue the network earns on transaction fees for payment transfers and asset exchanges.  The value of the network system is used as collateral to create monetary assets that can track the value of local currencies as well as other assets.  The network system uses price feeds and internal exchange prices to determine the value of the collateral at any given time and to ensure sufficient collateral is maintained for each corresponding monetary asset. 

Continued here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IwNEV-y-O-lsOPFkhotDHhvVm2cLV38PdImoWGSQvQ8/edit?usp=sharing

173
General Discussion / Re: TCNY has been accepted by BTC38.
« on: January 14, 2016, 02:50:10 am »
 +5%

174
The word 'dilution' is a bad word to use in cryptoland.  I say we stop using it around here and not consider it.

Maker and lending are best for increasing liquidity organically in a more market-driven, p2p fashion.  These two features combined with some market making with the reserve pool should be the first steps towards increasing liquidity.

Yeah I agree.  It's better to ask 'Should we fund a worker proposal to create a liquidity bot'..  A market making bot can be managed to break even or make a profit.  You can even have insurance just like Rune's Maker Dao proposal to support extreme adverse events.

175
General Discussion / Re: Lessons Learned from Alt Coins
« on: January 09, 2016, 08:24:46 pm »
re: Dogecoin

It was popular in the US before, but doesn't seem as active here anymore.  Oddly enough China seems like the big player.  Nearly 70% of the price spike volume was coming from BTC38.

Here is a thread on how Doge might have been introduced to many in China: https://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/3o2t5x/dogecoin_and_china/

People are familiar with Doge in China and that's huge.  There might even be a cultural connection with the Shiba Inu..lol

BTW a small amount of Dogecoin popped up in my BTC38 account so there might be a marketing push going on right now.....maybe they are giving people Doge, spreading the word and helping pump up prices..  Anyways China markets are getting crushed and crypto is generally a good safe haven asset anyways and so it's a good opportunity to promote Doge this way. 

Can someone from China comment?  BTW what is going on with the Yuan?  It seems the government is trying to support it by selling a lot of US dollar reserves.  There seems to have been massive debt money created the last few years in China as well and a lot of it is probably going bad...anyways.

Takeaway?  It seems China is very important.

doge marketing is good . but the capital that supports it is more important . especially those LTC miners who get doge on the way. the liquidity on doge is huge compare to bitshares .

if not capital support it , you can advertise it all you want , all people will see that it's not worth involving in it .

Bitcoin  and  doge are where it is today because of capital , not because of some freedom lovers and cute dog lovers .,

in fact , bitshares is as famous as doge in China . but bitshares is famous for its dilution now .

Ah yes that makes sense.  Thanks for the input.  The LTC merged mining is significant and does create a lot of liquidity.   That's another advantage of POW because it does attract mining capital whether or not people think it's wasteful.     Hopefully we can change the perception of Bitshares, but the awareness is just as important sometimes.   As they say any publicity is good publicity. 

I'd like add this last point:

* Launch first in china, then consider the rest of the world

Yeah China is a great market for crypto because the learning curve is so much lower for adoption


BTW a small amount of Dogecoin popped up in my BTC38 account so there might be a marketing push going on right now.....maybe they are giving people Doge, spreading the word and helping pump up prices..  Anyways China markets are getting crushed and crypto is generally a good safe haven asset anyways and so it's a good opportunity to promote Doge this way. 
Due to late of upgrading BTS to 2.0, and to attract more deposit/volume after they upgraded BTS to 2.0, BTC38 recompense the customers who have a BTS balance in their exchange at a dedicated time by dropping some Dogecoin to the customer's account at 10:1 ratio.


Thanks for the clarification.  Nice of them to do that..and they are effectively marketing Doge to BTS users.. Wow. much coolness. :)   

176
General Discussion / Re: Complementary currencies
« on: January 09, 2016, 07:34:46 pm »
Good to be in the same wavelength @jakub.  I just researched local/community currencies a couple weeks ago in the SF Bay Area....  I was going to reach out to the SF organization Bay Bucks (community currency/barter exhange network) and others in the surrounding area, but here is a list in the US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_community_currencies_in_the_United_States

I think some of them have strong networks already so it's a great fit for adding a UIA and we can also interlink all the systems together.  One of the problems you might find is that there are just  a number of networks that have  strong presence in certain communities and many that aren't that actively used.  However there definitely is strong potential with established community/local currency/barter exchange networks.   

177
General Discussion / Re: Welcome to TheDex.org
« on: January 09, 2016, 05:51:08 am »
 +5%

Nice to see another exchange project get going and good to see you have experience running a business in this space.

178
General Discussion / Re: Lessons Learned from Alt Coins
« on: January 09, 2016, 05:36:01 am »
re: Dogecoin

It was popular in the US before, but doesn't seem as active here anymore.  Oddly enough China seems like the big player.  Nearly 70% of the price spike volume was coming from BTC38.

Here is a thread on how Doge might have been introduced to many in China: https://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/3o2t5x/dogecoin_and_china/

People are familiar with Doge in China and that's huge.  There might even be a cultural connection with the Shiba Inu..lol

BTW a small amount of Dogecoin popped up in my BTC38 account so there might be a marketing push going on right now.....maybe they are giving people Doge, spreading the word and helping pump up prices..  Anyways China markets are getting crushed and crypto is generally a good safe haven asset anyways and so it's a good opportunity to promote Doge this way. 

Can someone from China comment?  BTW what is going on with the Yuan?  It seems the government is trying to support it by selling a lot of US dollar reserves.  There seems to have been massive debt money created the last few years in China as well and a lot of it is probably going bad...anyways.

Takeaway?  It seems China is very important. 

179
General Discussion / Digital Currency Exchange Cryptsy Suspends Trading
« on: January 06, 2016, 04:35:23 am »
Cryptsy, the digital currency exchange that has been dogged by rumors of insolvency amid persistent issues related to user withdrawals, has said that it has suspended its trade engine.

"Trade engine and withdrawals paused while we investigate cause of lag. Your patience is appreciated. Thank you," a message on the main Cryptsy page read at press time.

The exchange, which specializes in the trading of alternative cryptocurrencies (altcoins), has long been the subject of controversy. The exchange reported roughly 235 BTC in volume over the past 24 hours, but has long faced criticism over issues involving the withdrawal of user funds

Posts on social media and emails provided to CoinDesk provide evidence that some users have had issues taking their money out of the exchange since this fall. The continued issues – and what some users say is a lack of clarity from the exchange’s management team – have prompted claims that the exchange is insolvent or is the target of regulatory scrutiny.

The withdrawal complaints have prompted popular altcoin pricing site CoinMarketCap to delist the exchange, a move it also attributed to "skewed" prices on the platform. The site stated on Twitter that it would add Cryptsy after the issues are resolved.

In the past, Cryptsy has attributed the problems to technical issues, as well as denial-of-service attacks.

The problems have elicited comparisons to Mt Gox, the now-defunct Japan-based bitcoin exchange that, prior to its collapse, blamed technical problems for withdrawal problems and ultimately cut off access to customer funds.

Cryptsy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

http://www.coindesk.com/altcoin-exchange-cryptsy-takes-trade-engine-offline/

180
General Discussion / Re: Big bug in GUI asset update?
« on: January 05, 2016, 07:54:33 am »
I have tested and found that now the force settlement feature is actually enabled for TCNY.

according to the design, force settlement/allow witness to provide feed features should both be disabled because of the change but actually not, this is another bug and when in the future the bug be fixed these features will be actually disabled for TCNY, right?

so I wonder whether there are ways to reserve these features for TCNY, as they are important for a smartcoin.

Yeah I agree.   The features should be consistent with regular smartcoins.  (Although I'd probably want to disable forced settlement or make it 90%.)

So do these bugs just occur in the GUI and will CLI changes work fine?
It depends on how you use CLI, E.G. what command, what parameters, afaik some commands are fine but others are not.

Thx it would be good to know 1) which parameters we can change now 2) which ones we have to wait on a hard fork for 3) what day fixes are planned to be made 4) if this requires a worker proposal. 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 45