Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Winslow Strong

Pages: 1 [2]
16
bytemaster,
I think the problem occurs when adding or removing another miner using the same pts address.   I experienced it in both cases (adding and removing).   I've since switched to unique addresses for each miner.   When using unique addresses I have not seen the balance / paid reset to 0.   My experience is across 15 linux miners.

I hope this information hopes a little bit.

I can confirm this.  I had to reconnect my 5 server miners that use the same address, and my balance of 4.3 PTS got reset to 0. 

DO NOT USE THE SAME ADDRESS FOR MULTIPLE MINERS!

I will have a fix for this ASAP!  Good detective work guys.

I should also mention that I reconnected my miners because my system crashed.  So that could also have had something to do with it.  As soon as I reconnected the first one, balance was 0 and paid was 0, and it wasn't temporary.

17
bytemaster,
I think the problem occurs when adding or removing another miner using the same pts address.   I experienced it in both cases (adding and removing).   I've since switched to unique addresses for each miner.   When using unique addresses I have not seen the balance / paid reset to 0.   My experience is across 15 linux miners.

I hope this information hopes a little bit.

I can confirm this.  I had to reconnect my 5 server miners that use the same address, and my balance of 4.3 PTS got reset to 0. 

DO NOT USE THE SAME ADDRESS FOR MULTIPLE MINERS!

18
Used your affiliate link :)

PgmorTEHxRm5H8PHmN5fjni4ZZ2cGFDDCa

19
]attempting to connect to the-iland.net
481390ms th_a       miner.cpp:108                 main                 ] 64.90.183.137:8384
481470ms th_a       miner.cpp:114                 main                 ] unspecified
Broken pipe
    {"message":"Broken pipe"}
    asio  asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect

I resolved this error by taking my machine from my work to my home.  I hypothesize it was caused by the relevant port being blocked on my work network.

20
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
481390ms th_a       miner.cpp:108                 main                 ] 64.90.183.137:8384
481470ms th_a       miner.cpp:114                 main                 ] unspecified
Broken pipe
    {"message":"Broken pipe"}
    asio  asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect

This is exactly the error I get when I try to run the miner on my Linux Mint 15, 64-bit system.  To "install" I just ran
Code: [Select]
wget http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
chmod +x linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 the-iland.net <pts addr>

21
Thanks for the response, Nine Lives.  That explains the "shares," although I'm not quite sure why this intermediary is needed.  I.e. why not just denote balances in terms of PTS, i.e. scale shares so that PPS=1?

But is there something wrong with my system in that my hpm is 18, yet I send less than 1 hash per minute?

Ahh OK I think I get it now.  So the "balance" is actually in PTS, and the pps is just the increment in PTS per hash that's deemed sufficiently low.  Ok, kind of obvious in retrospect :)

Thanks ya'll.

22
One hash isn't one share. If you hash you and you end up with a hash low enough (starting with enough 0s) then it's considered a share, and is sent to the server.

When I "send," my balance goes up by about .04 shares, so that's clear.  But it seems that you are saying that most hashes calculated are discarded, and only those sufficiently low are submitted. 

I'm a total mining newb, so please bear with me. Out of curiosity, why does it work this way?  Aren't all hashes that aren't low enough to mine a block equally useless?  So why would some that are close to low enough be counted for shares, rather than just counting all hashes as shares?  Mining variance would be lowered even further by doing it that way.

Is it a filtering procedure to lower the burden on the mining pool?

Thanks ;)

23
Thanks for the response, Nine Lives.  That explains the "shares," although I'm not quite sure why this intermediary is needed.  I.e. why not just denote balances in terms of PTS, i.e. scale shares so that PPS=1?

But is there something wrong with my system in that my hpm is 18, yet I send less than 1 hash per minute?

24
I think I'm not understanding something very basic.  My hpm is around 18, but I only seem to submit less than 1 hash per minute (i.e. when it prints "sending").  The sending events are what increment the valid counter and everything else. 

I thought that what is sent is a hash that is found?  But if that's true, then why does it tell me I'm hashing at 18 per minute, but only submitting less than 1 per minute?

Also - what units is the balance in?  Do you need to multiply the balance by pps to convert it to PTS?

Thanks

Pages: 1 [2]