Open source please ... Bytemaster asked others to do it before he vote them, not you?
Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D
Our site is a service, not software development that we're creating for everyone to use. I'm much more comfortable running a service than handles customer money operating off closed-source that is not as vulnerable to exposure of potential weaknesses, especially during it's early development, although I don't want to get into a big debate of security of open- and closed-source. I've heard all the arguments over the years I think, and I'm reasonably confident this is a safer way to operate now. It's quite possible we will release it as open-source in the future, but I don't think it's a good idea now.
Something like BitShares has to be open-source very early on, in my opinion, but I don't think it's the right model for everything in software. As far as I understand, monsterer is providing software of this type, for general use by exchanges. Hopefully we'll see some adoption of it as time goes on.
As far as the voting in of our delegates, as I mentioned in an earlier posting, these funds go towards paying for our general software contributions, testing, and design help that we do for BitShares wallet-related work.