0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: donkeypong on October 21, 2014, 03:22:28 amQuote from: MeTHoDx on October 21, 2014, 03:10:35 amQuote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 02:08:02 amNegative publicity for one demographic is positive for another but you haven't figured this part out yet. If Bitshares X is going to catch on with millennials it has to be cool and right now it's not as cool as Counterparty. Wow. Very well said. Bitcoin was cool because it pushed boundaries and captured a lot of attention because of it. Bitshares should be pushing boundaries too, and capturing even more attention. Controversy is the best kind of marketing money can't buy. Case in point: Miley Cyrus.Yeah, I get that. I see that there would be some publicity value. But Miley Cyrus' brand was already worth $1 Billion when she started acting dumb; she established herself first. If we act dumb, we're going to win the hearts of some stoners and sacrifice the possibility of much greater things.Miley Cyrus isn't the best example but it's late and I'm not thinking straight. Controversy is extremely effective marketing. Old people will shun us, young people will embrace us. You know, the more I think about it, it was mainstream controversy that caused all of Bitcoins major bubbles. Major media outlets were calling it drug money and every other slur you can think of yet the price kept skyrocketing because for the first time, Bitcoin was on the publics radar. It wasn't until this year that the mainstream seems to have accepted Bitcoin and is even attempting to embrace it... yet the price bleeds out. Hmmmm. We need controversy, whether it comes from BitCannabis or something else.
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 21, 2014, 03:10:35 amQuote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 02:08:02 amNegative publicity for one demographic is positive for another but you haven't figured this part out yet. If Bitshares X is going to catch on with millennials it has to be cool and right now it's not as cool as Counterparty. Wow. Very well said. Bitcoin was cool because it pushed boundaries and captured a lot of attention because of it. Bitshares should be pushing boundaries too, and capturing even more attention. Controversy is the best kind of marketing money can't buy. Case in point: Miley Cyrus.Yeah, I get that. I see that there would be some publicity value. But Miley Cyrus' brand was already worth $1 Billion when she started acting dumb; she established herself first. If we act dumb, we're going to win the hearts of some stoners and sacrifice the possibility of much greater things.
Quote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 02:08:02 amNegative publicity for one demographic is positive for another but you haven't figured this part out yet. If Bitshares X is going to catch on with millennials it has to be cool and right now it's not as cool as Counterparty. Wow. Very well said. Bitcoin was cool because it pushed boundaries and captured a lot of attention because of it. Bitshares should be pushing boundaries too, and capturing even more attention. Controversy is the best kind of marketing money can't buy. Case in point: Miley Cyrus.
Negative publicity for one demographic is positive for another but you haven't figured this part out yet. If Bitshares X is going to catch on with millennials it has to be cool and right now it's not as cool as Counterparty.
If you call it "BitShit", then I'm in.
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 21, 2014, 03:33:40 amQuote from: donkeypong on October 21, 2014, 03:22:28 amQuote from: MeTHoDx on October 21, 2014, 03:10:35 amQuote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 02:08:02 amNegative publicity for one demographic is positive for another but you haven't figured this part out yet. If Bitshares X is going to catch on with millennials it has to be cool and right now it's not as cool as Counterparty. Wow. Very well said. Bitcoin was cool because it pushed boundaries and captured a lot of attention because of it. Bitshares should be pushing boundaries too, and capturing even more attention. Controversy is the best kind of marketing money can't buy. Case in point: Miley Cyrus.Yeah, I get that. I see that there would be some publicity value. But Miley Cyrus' brand was already worth $1 Billion when she started acting dumb; she established herself first. If we act dumb, we're going to win the hearts of some stoners and sacrifice the possibility of much greater things.Miley Cyrus isn't the best example but it's late and I'm not thinking straight. Controversy is extremely effective marketing. Old people will shun us, young people will embrace us. You know, the more I think about it, it was mainstream controversy that caused all of Bitcoins major bubbles. Major media outlets were calling it drug money and every other slur you can think of yet the price kept skyrocketing because for the first time, Bitcoin was on the publics radar. It wasn't until this year that the mainstream seems to have accepted Bitcoin and is even attempting to embrace it... yet the price bleeds out. Hmmmm. We need controversy, whether it comes from BitCannabis or something else.Let's start with - 'Those guys are building a system that makes possible for everybody to sell his vote!'. This should be controversial enough for the media...
Guess what? The people who will say that already are saying bad stuff about Bitshares X or they don't pay attention to it at all. The people who would want to ban BitUSD also want to ban Bitcoin and every cryptocurrency.
Quote from: onceuponatime on October 20, 2014, 08:47:41 pmQuote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 08:45:02 pmQuote from: matt608 on October 20, 2014, 07:55:01 pmLets just forget about this. We have more than enough markets to sell bitassets, there's no point going into a market that carries extra risk.Why are you afraid of risk? If you're afraid of pissing a powerful person off why would you even download Bitshares X?Choose your battles (and your timing) wisely.Because you're an American who happens to be in a state which criminalized marijuana? So if you're not an American? If you're not from one of those states? I guess you'll be going straight to Counterparty which appeals to a global userbase without fear.I think as a global blockchain you have to take these risks or the competitor will eat your lunch. If Bitshares X can do commodities better than any other technology and it ignores one of the biggest markets because someone in US congress may not like it then that is a sign of problems.A benefit of being decentralized and global is that you can take these risks. If you're behind on cannabis then you're risking losing the critical millennial demographic in favor of a demographic which will never care about Bitshares or use it. I think this caution on cannabis appeals to the wrong audiences for the wrong reasons and fails to follow what the polls say.The polls say this is what the millennials want: http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/04/marijuana-changing-attitudes/pp_13-04-03_ss_marijuana_05_age/65% of millennials support marijuana legalization. Follow the statistics not your fear.
Quote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 08:45:02 pmQuote from: matt608 on October 20, 2014, 07:55:01 pmLets just forget about this. We have more than enough markets to sell bitassets, there's no point going into a market that carries extra risk.Why are you afraid of risk? If you're afraid of pissing a powerful person off why would you even download Bitshares X?Choose your battles (and your timing) wisely.
Quote from: matt608 on October 20, 2014, 07:55:01 pmLets just forget about this. We have more than enough markets to sell bitassets, there's no point going into a market that carries extra risk.Why are you afraid of risk? If you're afraid of pissing a powerful person off why would you even download Bitshares X?
Lets just forget about this. We have more than enough markets to sell bitassets, there's no point going into a market that carries extra risk.
BitCannabis is far more useful than CannabisCoin because BitShares technology allows us to short BitCannabis. And with the trend towards legalization, shorting makes the most financial sense since it should get cheaper once the black market risk is priced out and corporations can take advantage of economies of scale.And just to be clear: Delegates please do not publish price feeds on any BitCannabis, or BitDrugs in general, should anyone ever register it. We do not need that kind of negative publicity right now.
Quote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 12:05:57 amI'm not endorsing SilkRoad or BitDrugs. But that's the take-away for many people. That's what they're going to say; that's the part that makes the news. Why endanger BitShares and its users this way? When you don't have to? Let this ecosystem establish itself and then draw a moving target on it. Don't do it now when we need to market this.
I'm not endorsing SilkRoad or BitDrugs.
I think it will be best if we create bitCannabiscoin on BTSX that will be paged to Cannabiscoin this way we will make a derivative market on the Cannabiscoin pegging 1 gram to 1 coin promise and will let people speculate on it's future value , this way we will offer a valuable service for Cannabiscoin community (opening shorts) and in the same time will increase our users base and BTSX value as a hole.
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 21, 2014, 01:36:52 amQuote from: donkeypong on October 21, 2014, 01:05:21 amQuote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 12:05:57 amI'm not endorsing SilkRoad or BitDrugs. But that's the take-away for many people. That's what they're going to say; that's the part that makes the news. Why endanger BitShares and its users this way? When you don't have to? Let this ecosystem establish itself and then draw a moving target on it. Don't do it now when we need to market this.I'm not taking one side or the other but if we got massive negative press from this it would result in our market cap instantly going to second place. I can almost guarantee that. I don't think any crypto that genuinely disrupts the current paradigm can ever expect to avoid controversy.Bri would be off the hook...but the delgates on the other hand...
Quote from: donkeypong on October 21, 2014, 01:05:21 amQuote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 12:05:57 amI'm not endorsing SilkRoad or BitDrugs. But that's the take-away for many people. That's what they're going to say; that's the part that makes the news. Why endanger BitShares and its users this way? When you don't have to? Let this ecosystem establish itself and then draw a moving target on it. Don't do it now when we need to market this.I'm not taking one side or the other but if we got massive negative press from this it would result in our market cap instantly going to second place. I can almost guarantee that. I don't think any crypto that genuinely disrupts the current paradigm can ever expect to avoid controversy.
Quote from: luckybit on October 21, 2014, 12:05:57 amQuote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 11:58:38 pmQuote from: OldMan on October 20, 2014, 07:48:44 pmCan someone explain why this community would want to voluntarily associate with controlled/illegal substances?It would be a terrible idea to introduce BitDrugs to Bitshares but I'm discussing this because I think it would be a fascinating experiment on a separate blockchain. Can you imagine a BTSX clone that's basically a forex market for trading BitAsset drugs? BitCannabis, BitCocain, BitLSD. It would be a totally legal prediction market for discovering the true value of a forbidden substance. Just like BitUSD isn't real USD, BitCannabis isn't real cannabis (just a digital token representing it's real world value). I think it's fun to have these discussions, purely out of scientific curiosity.AMERICA SUPPORTS LEGALIZATION: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/03/marijuana-legalization-support_n_5760462.htmlThe key difference is that BitCannabis has political support as shown by polls. "Drugs" in general do not have political support as shown by polls. If you do market research you'll find that millenials (our core demographic) want marijuana legalization which means there is a market for BitCannabis which will passionately defend it in the voting booth. There isn't a market to defend "BitDrugs".So I'm only saying we should have a BitCannabis and forget about the other drugs until the polls shift and show that millennials support legalization of those drugs. If you're not going to listen to your demographic base by following polls then you're acting irrationally. Even politicians in government make decisions based around polls so even they are more rational about this than some here.Ultimately this irrationality is going to be punished by the market because the market favors the bold. When over 60% of millennials are in favor of something and they are our core demographic then to disobey them is to go against your core demographic. That makes it irrational from a marketing and strategic development standpoint.I'm not endorsing SilkRoad or BitDrugs. I'm only endorsing BitCannabis because the people who matter the most to the success of all future DACs support legalization. If I don't listen to them then I'm not being a good representative of their interests. I do understand the arguments that maybe it shouldn't be done right before the election and that the timing could be bad but I think a quiet launch of BitCannabis could attract all the right kind of people to Bitshares X because they are the kind of people who will use Bitshares X for the long term.I only ask that a rational case be presented for why we should ignore the will of our core demographic. The politicians you're afraid of aren't ignoring the will of their core demographic and the fact that marijuana is legal in some places is proof that even their core demographic is changing their opinions.I know you're only endorsing the issuance of BitCannabis on the Bitshares Exchange platform. If this were put to a vote I would absolutely vote in favor because I'm into Bitshares for philosophic reasons more than getting rich quick. I'm just saying I think it would be ridiculously cool to have a forex market for day trading BitAsset drugs. Purely as an intellectual thought experiment.
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 11:58:38 pmQuote from: OldMan on October 20, 2014, 07:48:44 pmCan someone explain why this community would want to voluntarily associate with controlled/illegal substances?It would be a terrible idea to introduce BitDrugs to Bitshares but I'm discussing this because I think it would be a fascinating experiment on a separate blockchain. Can you imagine a BTSX clone that's basically a forex market for trading BitAsset drugs? BitCannabis, BitCocain, BitLSD. It would be a totally legal prediction market for discovering the true value of a forbidden substance. Just like BitUSD isn't real USD, BitCannabis isn't real cannabis (just a digital token representing it's real world value). I think it's fun to have these discussions, purely out of scientific curiosity.AMERICA SUPPORTS LEGALIZATION: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/03/marijuana-legalization-support_n_5760462.htmlThe key difference is that BitCannabis has political support as shown by polls. "Drugs" in general do not have political support as shown by polls. If you do market research you'll find that millenials (our core demographic) want marijuana legalization which means there is a market for BitCannabis which will passionately defend it in the voting booth. There isn't a market to defend "BitDrugs".So I'm only saying we should have a BitCannabis and forget about the other drugs until the polls shift and show that millennials support legalization of those drugs. If you're not going to listen to your demographic base by following polls then you're acting irrationally. Even politicians in government make decisions based around polls so even they are more rational about this than some here.Ultimately this irrationality is going to be punished by the market because the market favors the bold. When over 60% of millennials are in favor of something and they are our core demographic then to disobey them is to go against your core demographic. That makes it irrational from a marketing and strategic development standpoint.I'm not endorsing SilkRoad or BitDrugs. I'm only endorsing BitCannabis because the people who matter the most to the success of all future DACs support legalization. If I don't listen to them then I'm not being a good representative of their interests. I do understand the arguments that maybe it shouldn't be done right before the election and that the timing could be bad but I think a quiet launch of BitCannabis could attract all the right kind of people to Bitshares X because they are the kind of people who will use Bitshares X for the long term.I only ask that a rational case be presented for why we should ignore the will of our core demographic. The politicians you're afraid of aren't ignoring the will of their core demographic and the fact that marijuana is legal in some places is proof that even their core demographic is changing their opinions.
Quote from: OldMan on October 20, 2014, 07:48:44 pmCan someone explain why this community would want to voluntarily associate with controlled/illegal substances?It would be a terrible idea to introduce BitDrugs to Bitshares but I'm discussing this because I think it would be a fascinating experiment on a separate blockchain. Can you imagine a BTSX clone that's basically a forex market for trading BitAsset drugs? BitCannabis, BitCocain, BitLSD. It would be a totally legal prediction market for discovering the true value of a forbidden substance. Just like BitUSD isn't real USD, BitCannabis isn't real cannabis (just a digital token representing it's real world value). I think it's fun to have these discussions, purely out of scientific curiosity.
Can someone explain why this community would want to voluntarily associate with controlled/illegal substances?
The survey, released last week from online polling data company CivicScience, asked more than 450,000 U.S. adults over the last two years this question: "Would you support or oppose a law in your state that would legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana like alcohol?"Fifty-eight percent of respondents said they support marijuana legalization -- with 39 percent saying they "strongly support" and 19 percent saying they "somewhat support" reformed marijuana laws in their states. Thirty-five percent oppose legalization of marijuana -- with 29 percent "strongly" opposing and 6 percent "somewhat" opposing laws that would regulate marijuana like alcohol. Seven percent of respondents had no opinion on the issue.
Men were found to be slightly more in favor of legalization than women were, by 60 to 55 percent, according to CivicScience's survey data. Support for legalization was strongest among people ages 25-34; the only age group in which the majority of people opposed legalization was those over 65.
Dont worry guys and girls...there is plenty of time for "darkshares" to come out sharedropping on bts holders 50% to gain Maximum allegiance from bts holders and the voting demographic they grow to represent.Those living in jurisdictions where the risk is low will buy the heck out of them as those living in "free" states like the USA will dump the hell out of them and buy regular bts out of fear of being detained indefinitely without trial or charge (see NDAA 2011). Then both chains will flourish and the innovations from each can be adopted by the other..Like onceuponatime says...choose your battles...and the timing wisely. Ive unfortunately learned this the hard way on these very forums. Damn wise imho.
It's just a matter of time before pot is legal everywhere. As long as it's illegal in most places, having a BitCannabis would be one more reason for regulators to take a tough stance on BitShares. You want to have gateways with banks and stuff, then this is something you don't do. Ain't worth it.
Quote from: donkeypong on October 20, 2014, 09:06:54 pmIt's just a matter of time before pot is legal everywhere. As long as it's illegal in most places, having a BitCannabis would be one more reason for regulators to take a tough stance on BitShares. You want to have gateways with banks and stuff, then this is something you don't do. Ain't worth it.This.
Quote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:55:06 pmQuote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 04:49:24 pmQuote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:38:48 pmQuote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amhttp://cointelegraph.com/news/112748/cannabiscoin-officially-redeemable-for-1-gram-starting-october-20-interview-with-founderThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.Where would price feeds come from? The value of 1 gram in the U.S. will be different than in Jamaca and every other country. Cool idea though. Similar to BitMac, tracking the value of a McDonalds BigMac.That is the point. What is the real value of 1 gram of cannabis? We don't know because we haven't had a way to find out.So no price feeds, just let it float naturally and the market will discover its true value. It would be absolutely fascinating to try that on a forked version of BTSX, with all major drugs issued as assets. (Note: not saying I endorse this or think it should be incorporated into BTSX. It would make for a fascinating experiment!)
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 04:49:24 pmQuote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:38:48 pmQuote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amhttp://cointelegraph.com/news/112748/cannabiscoin-officially-redeemable-for-1-gram-starting-october-20-interview-with-founderThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.Where would price feeds come from? The value of 1 gram in the U.S. will be different than in Jamaca and every other country. Cool idea though. Similar to BitMac, tracking the value of a McDonalds BigMac.That is the point. What is the real value of 1 gram of cannabis? We don't know because we haven't had a way to find out.
Quote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:38:48 pmQuote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amhttp://cointelegraph.com/news/112748/cannabiscoin-officially-redeemable-for-1-gram-starting-october-20-interview-with-founderThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.Where would price feeds come from? The value of 1 gram in the U.S. will be different than in Jamaca and every other country. Cool idea though. Similar to BitMac, tracking the value of a McDonalds BigMac.
Quote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amhttp://cointelegraph.com/news/112748/cannabiscoin-officially-redeemable-for-1-gram-starting-october-20-interview-with-founderThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.
http://cointelegraph.com/news/112748/cannabiscoin-officially-redeemable-for-1-gram-starting-october-20-interview-with-founderThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 05:03:13 pmQuote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:55:06 pmQuote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 04:49:24 pmQuote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:38:48 pmQuote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.Where would price feeds come from? The value of 1 gram in the U.S. will be different than in Jamaca and every other country. Cool idea though. Similar to BitMac, tracking the value of a McDonalds BigMac.That is the point. What is the real value of 1 gram of cannabis? We don't know because we haven't had a way to find out.So no price feeds, just let it float naturally and the market will discover its true value. It would be absolutely fascinating to try that on a forked version of BTSX, with all major drugs issued as assets. (Note: not saying I endorse this or think it should be incorporated into BTSX. It would make for a fascinating experiment!)I agree that this would be an absolutely fascinating experiment. That being said, I feel that I agree more fully with OldMan that, at least in this early stage, that could lead to some bad publicity and harm the image of Bitshares, potentially deterring some possible investors.
Quote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:55:06 pmQuote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 04:49:24 pmQuote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:38:48 pmQuote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.Where would price feeds come from? The value of 1 gram in the U.S. will be different than in Jamaca and every other country. Cool idea though. Similar to BitMac, tracking the value of a McDonalds BigMac.That is the point. What is the real value of 1 gram of cannabis? We don't know because we haven't had a way to find out.So no price feeds, just let it float naturally and the market will discover its true value. It would be absolutely fascinating to try that on a forked version of BTSX, with all major drugs issued as assets. (Note: not saying I endorse this or think it should be incorporated into BTSX. It would make for a fascinating experiment!)
Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 20, 2014, 04:49:24 pmQuote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:38:48 pmQuote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.Where would price feeds come from? The value of 1 gram in the U.S. will be different than in Jamaca and every other country. Cool idea though. Similar to BitMac, tracking the value of a McDonalds BigMac.That is the point. What is the real value of 1 gram of cannabis? We don't know because we haven't had a way to find out.
Quote from: luckybit on October 20, 2014, 04:38:48 pmQuote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.Where would price feeds come from? The value of 1 gram in the U.S. will be different than in Jamaca and every other country. Cool idea though. Similar to BitMac, tracking the value of a McDonalds BigMac.
Quote from: eagleeye on October 20, 2014, 05:50:05 amThe possibilities...This may have already been brought up.Maybe it would be cool to have a cannabis asset on Bitshares we could trade pegged to the value of 1 gram? That would be brilliant really.
The possibilities...This may have already been brought up.
Not to pee on anyone's parade...but this carries with it the same potential legal issues as "bitCocaine" which has already been discussed (largely as a joke) and thwarted before it even got close to Mick Jagger's nose.
The U.S. response to this tension has thusfar been to call for more "flexibility" in how countries interpret them. This policy was made explicit in recent remarks by Assistant Secretary of State William Brownfield, who last week at the United Nations said that "we have to be tolerant of different countries, in response to their own national circumstances and conditions, exploring and using different national drug control policies." He went on: "How could I, a representative of the Government of the United States of America, be intolerant of a government that permits any experimentation with legalization of marijuana if two of the 50 states of the United States of America have chosen to walk down that road?"As far as policy stances go this is an aggressively pragmatic solution. The federal government lacks the resources and perhaps the political will to crack down on the legalization states, but it also likely doesn't want to openly admit that it's allowing regulation regimes that openly contradict the provisions of major treaties.
Quote from: forestalnet on October 20, 2014, 05:21:01 pmHi.. I´m from Argentina and here we´re very concern about the soybeans price at Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT).That´s the price we get when selling soya to our chinese customers. After the last financial crisis (2008) Soya became a commodity chosse by big whales investors and the market became extremly volatile.A BitSoya or SoyaCoin already exists?I am FAR more aligned with this kind of stuff being on the decentralized exchange. This was a similar reason to why I seriously agreed with JoeyD for suggesting bitCoke (as in coca cola)...because it would enable people to invoke the "cocain" memes, but more importantly...to enable citizens in different countries to know when they are being overcharged for their coca cola. For instance, in the philippines a litre of coca cola costs as much as a 2-liter does here in america--a 100% markup for people who are effectively 10% as wealthy. This would help level the cost for everyone.
Hi.. I´m from Argentina and here we´re very concern about the soybeans price at Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT).That´s the price we get when selling soya to our chinese customers. After the last financial crisis (2008) Soya became a commodity chosse by big whales investors and the market became extremly volatile.A BitSoya or SoyaCoin already exists?
Wow they managed to get all this publicity from claiming that they can back an inflationary proof of work coin with 1 gram of cannabis. What a joke.Makes me think that we should create BitCannabis on BTSX - pegged to 1 gram of cannabis. That would actually make sense.