Yep, I bet that's right. The point of the question is at what point (users / transaction volume) will the avg, user no longer be able to run a full node?
It testing is as thorough as we're led to believe, to the point of benchmarking transaction throughput in the neighborhood of 180,000 transactions / sec, then I would certainly hope they would be able to provide some type of projection about the rate of ecosystem growth and the requirements on RAM / bandwidth / CPU as adoption / use expands.
Not only am I asking to plan for necessary VPS upgrades and failover servers, but it is also my plan to run a full node as long as possible to support a local wallet. There's no question in my mind that there is less vulnerability on a one wallet / one server configuration than the multi-user-server configuration that will become the dominant standard. I prefer to be as safe and secure as I can and see how this entirely new code base it going to workout before I rely on it in the multi-user-server configuration. Better safe than sorry approach.