No reason we all can't own BitShares 3.0 as well.
There's no reason we can't, but is there a reason we should? It seems like a low-opportunity and possibly detrimental marketing choice, respectfully.
I concluded above that a sidechain asset into a native EOS DEX would make the most sense. Competition is good for everyone, at least those like us with good tech.
Look at the world.
The most connected places have the best economies.
EOS is the next level of connectivity - a new ecosystem.
We can own a piece of it IN ADDITION TO our current ecosystem.
If we don't do it someone else will and we won't own any of it.
I am almost 100% sure I would be in favour of a worker proposal to pay for the implentation of BTS onto EOS.
The question, does an EOS DEX render BTS 2.0 obselete?
My main concern is that EOS can perform every single function of BTS 2.0, and more.
So what new investor or customer is going to use/buy bts if EOS is better?
I want to see that BTS 2.0 has a bone fide reason to exist after a full-scale, working implementation of EOS.
.... if it comes down to it and BTS 2.0 shareholders are forced to conclude that the best way to stay in the game is to jump ship and hold EOS instead... then so be it.
In this crypto wild west of ruthless competition this may well be what should be expected.
......But currently the BTS 2.0 community could be viewed as a "team", all on the same side. A tough choice between "stay with BTS 2 or jump to EOS" could it not conceivable result in a race to the bottom?
Will there be a unique BTS 2.0 feature set that ensures a "floor price" of bts in the event that many investors dump and switch to EOS?
With what is happening This Summer, you won't even be thinking about EOS till Christmas.
IF HERO works, I am confident it will. I'm sure there's other stuff too.
How useful is HERO if BTS 2.0 expires by the end of 2017? (because of EOS)
EOS links chains, think about that for a second
If this is the main purpose, use case, selling point, the main reason to hold EOS then that is fantastic.
But when "EOS should have it's own native DEX" is mentioned, this makes me wonder what percentage of EOS' profitability will come from linking chains, facilitating other crypto-systems.
If EOS can do things like make it's own DEX, why should EOS bother enabling chain-linking coins like DOGEcoin to Monero?
... Why not just build Monero and DOGEcoin on EOS itself and steal all their customers?
Why should EOS bother to 'link' BTS 2.0 chain to anybody else's chain?
"Here customer, EOS' let's you connect to BTS2.0!!! ... but don't bother, we can do everything for you for cheaper using our EOS DEX. I'll link you straight there instead and save you the hassle of obsolete BTS2"