我发送到AGS好几天的没有确认

状态: 0/未确认
日期: 2014/3/27 11:09
到: AngleShares PaNGELmZgzRQCKeEKM6ifgTqNkC4ceiAWw
支出: -10.00 PTS
净额: -10.00 PTS
交易ID: b083028046ebe293ccf6e79c0d9ea1ec3a6e43d66e6e9e3f504abf4d1999458a

Brian delegated the website to a firm that did an ok job, but there are two issues:

The content is incomplete and inaccurate. 

I am providing raw content and will let someone else make it pretty.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote from: onceuponatime on March 29, 2014, 05:19:41 am

Quote from: bytemaster on March 29, 2014, 05:06:42 am

Would you please give a brief indication of the implications of using both. Would you be releasing two versions of of each DAC at the same time, and PTS/AGS holders would get at least 10% in each version, and must run two blockchains simultaneously for every DAC?

I would release the one I think is best, competitors would probably fork it and still honor AGS/PTS.  Remember we can fork them if they don't .    If they produce a better product / solution then I will adopt it for future DACs.    My goal is most value, best results.   Competition makes us all stronger and I welcome it.

Greetings Bitshares community, I'm a longtime lurker, first time poster.
 
This seems like we are at a critical fork in the road to the successful BTS launch.  A fork that our competitors will be the first to exploit by offering countless alternatives to.   

I’ve been lurking here for 5 months without a peep.  Why? Simply because I see that the man actually reads these posts.  What is five minutes of Dan’s time worth to us?

 

Log 你这个“锁定价格”的定义非常赞！

我考虑了一下，基于典当的需求确实可以用交易类型丰富的抵押借贷DAC来囊括了，那我们为啥不做一个更大业务范畴的DAC呢？

抵押借贷DAC 或者 借贷DAC ？  嗯 make sense ( 在此征求一个名字的意见）

 

3i就像搞APPSTORE，然后等待第三方开发类似愤怒小鸟这玩样儿。