Quote from: sittingduck on May 09, 2015, 04:07:20 pm

I don't think he was proposing to change the dilution  rate, just the power stakeholders have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

no one can change rule,  this discussing is useless, if the income cannot pay the core developer income ,we have AGS, to pay them , and if change the rule it would make bts price drop so much , delegate income would decrease much.

So you think the ags funds will last that long?   They are mostly gone and at these prices they can only cover for short time. 

The only rule left is stakeholders decide.  From what I see here delegates would be split and their income unchanged.   Going forward shareholders can vote different mixes of funding and block producers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think he was proposing to change the dilution  rate, just the power stakeholders have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The current system barely works even when there are no bugs.  This system is much simpler to explain.  I believe bytemaster is trying to say that a lack of shorts selling at the feed is ok.  I also agree that even without fiat ramps, the most cost effective way to buy bts should be by buying bitusd first.  This is the only way we can be sure bitusd is the most directly liquid. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great post about dac being a community and not a company. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think it is assumed that bugs must be fixed. But it doesn't change the fact that PayPal and other companies with no bugs still had high user acquisition costs. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What does this mean?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The point of good entropy source is for smart contracts.   I like the idea of using both two secrets and new shuffle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk