BitShares Forum
Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: Pheonike on November 03, 2014, 05:52:56 pm
-
I know its been discuss to death, but i do think we need to define categories for types of delegates. Since on a technical level there is nothing to distinguish what delegates do. There should be some type of classification so at glance we know what their role is. Just like a company has different departments that focus on different aspects of the business. Here are some I thoughts of below
Marketing Delegate - promotes and expand user base. Works on branding with online/offline campaigns
Developer Delegate - Works on adding new functionality/Dapps to Bitshares
Technical Delegate - Standard delegate. Signs blocks. Help test new features/functions in client. Quality control.
Communications Delegate - Coordinates projects between delegates. Moderates communications within Bitshares (what Fuzz does ;) )
Again there are no required code changes. Just a way to make since on what everyone is contributing if they are a delegate.
-
So you would suggest to name the delegates accordingly?
tech.delegate.xeroc
support.delegate.xeroc
marketing.delegate.xeroc
development.delegate.xeroc
?
I like that idea ... however, if you want to do a subset of all of them?
I'd say we make the delegate publish a page/document that describes purpose/goals/finance (however that page might be easy to *change* afterwards
-
It does not have to be reflected in their name. But when we get some kind of delegates site, it would be useful to know what your delegates stands for.
-
Ah.. ok ..
AFAIK cass ia working on sth like this ...
-
So you would suggest to name the delegates accordingly?
25% tech.delegate.xeroc
40% support.delegate.xeroc
20% marketing.delegate.xeroc
15% development.delegate.xeroc
?
I like that idea ... however, if you want to do a subset of all of them?
I'd say we make the delegate publish a page/document that describes purpose/goals/finance (however that page might be easy to *change* afterwards