Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - btspp

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14
151
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 【讨论】后BSIP42时代bitCNY的规则改进
« on: December 03, 2018, 02:42:11 pm »
2.1和2.2部分,我不觉得这样喂溢价合适。如果有人觉得见证人操作喂价,他们也会认定操作溢价。没什么区别。反而这样会失去灵活性,如果这种方式最后发现不太合适。要修改,估计又需要等到下次分叉了。

关于mssr我建议动态调整,可以根据一定规则评估黑天鹅风险系数。风险系数大的时候mssr增加,鼓励搬砖吃爆仓单。风险系数小的时候mssr降低。

那你觉得怎样合适呢?

MSSR也搞动态的话感觉太复杂了。

喂的数据还是直接喂“价格”就行,只是算法调整,保留灵活性。
MSSR动态确实需要一些规则,复杂性会上升。目前来说就固定测试一些参数就可。105 102都可以测测看到底哪些适合。

152
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 【讨论】后BSIP42时代bitCNY的规则改进
« on: December 03, 2018, 01:52:02 pm »
2.1和2.2部分,我不觉得这样喂溢价合适。如果有人觉得见证人操作喂价,他们也会认定操作溢价。没什么区别。反而这样会失去灵活性,如果这种方式最后发现不太合适。要修改,估计又需要等到下次分叉了。

关于mssr我建议动态调整,可以根据一定规则评估黑天鹅风险系数。风险系数大的时候mssr增加,鼓励搬砖吃爆仓单。风险系数小的时候mssr降低。

153
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: December 03, 2018, 12:34:29 pm »
Hello xeroc
It is convenient to look at this proposal, we believe in terms of time cost and product integrity. This has certain advantages.
In addition, we would like to invite you to join the proposal account multi-sign management. I don't know if you are interested.
Proposal address: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0
Thank your for the offer! I much appreciate the trust you put in me.
The only issue that I am facing is time. I feel that I cannot perform the
amount of review that would be expected from me when being part
of this multisig group.

Very regrettable.
However, abit and jademont have already participated. I don't know if you can understand our worker proposal, we need you to vote for us.
thank you very much.

154
OpenLedger has also recently submitted a bill for developers of mobile app. I think we should have a good communication to find out what is necessary and what is not necessary, so as to avoid repetitive work and pay too much money.

Of course, we also seriously compared the openledger app. I believe that we have certain advantages in terms of time cost and product quality. However, we will continue to communicate with the other side, hoping to achieve a cooperative approach.

Hello, would be happy to discuss way to collaborate. We can talk here, also you can reach me at @charyury in Telegram.

Can you pm my telegram, @syalon. I seem to have restrictions on sending you messages.

155
I think this is the settlement price. Setttment order will match the call order, not the limit order.

156
I have voted for you, but still worry about the efficiency of this architecture with the old API server.
wish you can improve it.

thank you very much.
You are very right, now there are many problems with the api server. We will try to optimize this part as much as possible. And in many ways we need to work with the Core team. For example: compressing response data, etc.

157
looks very good.
can you introduce some details about communicate with api server,
like what type is the api server, how many clients support for the api server?

About api server. We have the following considerations.
1. Some existing public api servers will be accessed and will dynamically test the response delay.
2. As the number of users of dex increases, we will build a load balancing server in the corresponding area according to the user area.
3. If the market has greater demand, the same server nodes will be built in other parts of the world.
The Chinese region mainly considers Aliyun Cloud. Overseas will consider Amazon or Azure.

There is currently no approximate estimate of the number of clients that the api server can support. However, based on the number of long connections that a single server can support and the size of data per user request, we should be able to estimate the corresponding bandwidth requirements and maximum load.

I hope you can vote for us. Thank you.

158
OpenLedger has also recently submitted a bill for developers of mobile app. I think we should have a good communication to find out what is necessary and what is not necessary, so as to avoid repetitive work and pay too much money.

Of course, we also seriously compared the openledger app. I believe that we have certain advantages in terms of time cost and product quality. However, we will continue to communicate with the other side, hoping to achieve a cooperative approach.

159
I really want to support you, but now the price of BTS is too low, the expenditure of BTS is about 3 million, should we wait for the return of the value of BTS, and then sell BTS to pay the budget?

I very much agree with you. We will eventually pay in bitUSD and we will consider selling the BTS at the right price. The extra BTS will be returned to the system.
We are also trying to communicate with the openledger. However, they do not have any feedback yet.

160
HTLC原子交换据说马上测试了,但就算HTLC完成了,要完全去网关也还涉及很多问题。比如转入的BTc存哪里了?见证人多签账号?

161
Voting for the workers started: openledger_mobile_apps_ph1 and openledger_mobile_apps_ph2!
See https://dex.openledger.io/news/openledger-mobile-app-worker/ for more details.

Hello yury
Interested in seeing our proposal, I feel that there are certain advantages in terms of experience, time cost and so on. Maybe there is cooperation on our side? Can you cast a valuable vote for us?
Details: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0

162
Quote
OpenLedger provides ready-to-use open-source mobile apps for Bitshares in the shortest terms, based on the current OL apps. Fabian offers to implement a software development kit (SDK) that simplifies creation of new custom mobile application that uses Bitshares.
I'd like to point out that our proposal comes **WITH** a working mobile wallet as you can see from the pictures.

The point of calling it an SDK is because we want to extend it and raise funds for developing those extensions ..

Hello xeroc
It is convenient to look at this proposal, we believe in terms of time cost and product integrity. This has certain advantages.
In addition, we would like to invite you to join the proposal account multi-sign management. I don't know if you are interested.
Proposal address: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0

163
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: November 30, 2018, 05:00:01 am »
Hello xeroc
It is convenient to look at this proposal, we believe in terms of time cost and product integrity. This has certain advantages.
In addition, we would like to invite you to join the proposal account multi-sign management. I don't know if you are interested.
Proposal address: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0

164
Update. Added screenshots of some existing products. Multi-language has not been completed yet.

165
OpenSource Efficient HighQuality Security Stable Mobile App

Please vote for us.
Proposal: 201812 Bitshares Mobile App
ID: 1.14.138


GitHub: https://github.com/btspp/bitshares-mobile-app

GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.bitshares.app

Overview
Mobile phones have become an indispensable part of people's lives, and people are used to handling various things through mobile phones.
BitShares is a 7*24-hour decentralized exchange where people can log in to their accounts at any time to view markets, or trade, or transfer money. Therefore, a mobile wallet with good experience and complete functions is urgently needed in the market.

Background
At present, BitShares official products only provide PC-side, as well as some mobile wallets with poor experience or lack of function, which makes it more difficult for more users to access and use Bitshares.
In the fast-growing blockchain industry, opportunities will soon be lost. As a decentralized exchange that has been running for 5 years, there is no official mobile wallet with perfect functions and good experience. This is where we need to reflect.
Efficient development and good experience have always been the goal of our team. Therefore, we hope to continue to improve the development based on the existing BTS++ wallet and provide it to users. Give old users a new choice, and give new users access to Bitshares to provide the same experience as CEX.

Vision
We believe that at least the following points should be met as a mobile product of BitShares.
1. As the BitShares mobile wallet, its source code must be open source and subject to review.
2. It should at least contain the same functionality as the PC and support wallet mode.
3. It has related functions such as asset storage, trading, and management.
4. It should meet the basic trading needs of the user. Market view, K-line view, various indicators, etc.
5. It should provide voting capabilities.
6. It should have a good user experience.
7. It should have multi-language support.
8. Users can download directly from the AppStore and GooglePlay Store.

Goal
● Build BitShares' open source mobile products and become the core team for mobile development.
● Synchronize most of the features that PC wallet has.
● Provide products that experience good, stable, and safe.
● On the AppStore and GooglePlay stores.
● The follow-up Core team functions are fully synchronized.

Route map
The work proposal will start from 2018.12.10 until the end of 2019.5.10, with a period of 5 months.

1. Current BTS++ Wallet: Features already available. There is a BTS++ video on youtube. Link address: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUeS_boYmKo
Also welcome to download the Android version at http://btspp.io for the experience.
● Supports registration, login, and backup. Supports account mode and wallet mode.
● Support all asset viewing and trading of BitShares
● Markets, timeline, K-line chart, trading history
● Collateral
● account search, feed price details, margin postion rank
● Transfer function
● Voting function
● Asset and order view
● FAQ

2. The first phase of the work roadmap: estimated 6 weeks
● Add English version
● Add multiple account management
● Add multiple signatures
● deposits/withdrawals
● Open source on GitHub.

3. The second phase of the work roadmap: estimated 14 weeks.
● Add more language options
● Add PC-side features: upgrade lifetime membership, asset search, etc.
● Add QR code scan code: import private key, transfer, etc.
● Synchronize Core team related features, such as HTLC.
● On the AppStore and GooglePlay Store.

Costs
We expect the total development cycle to be only 5 months (152 days). The weekly budget is $6000, which is equivalent to a daily budget of $857, and the daily BTS budget is about 28,000. The total budget is $130000. The fund account is multi-signed management. Participated by multiple committee members. The excess funds are returned to the system.

Current multi-signature committee members: abit, jademont

RolesMemberRate(bitUSD/h)Hours/weeks
Full-stack DeveloperXiaoxia$12020hours
Android DeveloperQingfeng$10015hours
CoordinatorDigcat$705hours
DesignerYangming$7015hours
PMXiaoxia$805hours
QA/TesterYangming$605hours
Weekly Budget$6000
Total Budget$130000

Team Member
Xiaoxia: Founder of BTS++. 10 years of internet product development experience. Basic knowledge is solid and proficient, and good at the development of C, C++, Ruby, etc. Has a deep research on block chain, server, client, game engine, interpreter, virtual machine, AI and so on.
Responsible for development of BTS++ communication protocol layer and for development of IOS.

Qingfeng: Core developer. more than 10 years of technology research and development experience. Experienced in the development of client and website, good at web structure, front end and back end development, Android development, and intelligent contract development.
Responsible for the development of Android client and website.

Yangming: Co-founder. years of marketing and business experience. Responsible for product design, promotion operation, marketing and business reception.

Digcat: Coordinator . Rich experience in data mining and requirements analysis。

Screenshots




Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14