226
General Discussion / Re: [Update] Forum: correct url to block explorer with specified BTS account
« on: December 23, 2018, 12:05:27 pm »
bts.ai developed into a really good explorer!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
bts.ai developed into a really good explorer!
227
General Discussion / Re: Independence of Witnesses
« on: December 21, 2018, 01:31:32 pm »
BSIP42 was meant to grant **explicit** permission to witnesses to experiment with price feeds more aggressively and improve the "peg".
Of course, witnesses need to stand by their own decisions and can either support or not support such efforts.
Of course, witnesses need to stand by their own decisions and can either support or not support such efforts.
228
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Social media marketing proposal
« on: December 21, 2018, 06:54:24 am » for doing marketing.You'll have higher chances of succeeding with a worker proposal if you were asking bitUSD or bitCNY instead of BTS.
Another quite common requirement by proxies is that you have some sort of escrow group for those funds
229
General Discussion / Re: plan to raise the bitCNY force settlement offset to 5%
« on: December 20, 2018, 10:52:24 am »
I have to disagree with bitcrab and support clockwork here. Same rational
230
General Discussion / Re: BTS internal disc has been killed by witness SB. What do you think of the board？
« on: December 20, 2018, 10:48:54 am »
What the heck are you talking about? Could you please explain in clearer words?
Also, please don't swear ..
Also, please don't swear ..
231
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: December 20, 2018, 08:16:30 am »
FYI, I have removed my votes from committee members that have (after 3 weeks) not replied to the proposed fee schedule changes. Pretty disappointing.
232
General Discussion / Re: Why the BTS network status is so bad these days?
« on: December 20, 2018, 07:01:12 am »Bug reports can go here:Which version client are you guys using?I have tried almost 10 different "stable" versions recently published,
but almost no one can be used in fact
I wonder who are the manage of the GUI development worker, too bad.
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/
233
General Discussion / Re: fuckyou zapata42-witness delegate-1.lafona sahkan-bitshares fox bhuz witness.yao
« on: December 19, 2018, 03:38:54 pm »
This topic is locked - no value has been added by the OP.
Stay constructive, or go somewhere else.
Stay constructive, or go somewhere else.
234
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy:baozi - proxy for anti-dilution
« on: December 19, 2018, 08:10:55 am »don't worry, I have supported some workers
but I will not support too many workers or witness because most of them are still very unresponsible.
How are workers unresponsible when you can ping them on Telegram, you get answers
here in the forums, on github and elsewhere?
most of them got support only because that they have good friendship with some proxy.
So you are saying because I do my background research and get to know the people I vote (and vouch) for,
They don't get your votes despite them delivering on *their* promises?
Not sure about everyone else, but that doesn't sound about right to me.
How about we set up a workers group (mailing list, telegram, whatever) so you get to know those workers
better and can judge on *their performance* instead of their connection to me?
235
Technical Support / Re: Bitshares JS market trade history
« on: December 17, 2018, 04:14:36 pm »
This is a query that returns a result for me:
{"method": "call", "params": [0, "get_trade_history", ["BTS", "USD", "2018-12-17T16:13:49", "2018-12-16T16:13:49", 10]], "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 3}
It requires the market_plugin to be enabled on the backend. Try against "wss://node.bitshares.eu"
{"method": "call", "params": [0, "get_trade_history", ["BTS", "USD", "2018-12-17T16:13:49", "2018-12-16T16:13:49", 10]], "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 3}
It requires the market_plugin to be enabled on the backend. Try against "wss://node.bitshares.eu"
236
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: December 17, 2018, 02:12:39 pm »Xeroc,I love the work and passion you've put into this .. support!
On behalf of the DEXbot Cabinet (Permie, Gabe, Kevin Messerly, CryptoKong, and Cryptick) we would like to ask for your support for the "DEXBot WP2 Liquidity for the DEX" Worker Proposal. We feel as though we have made great progress, and everyone at BitShares will benefit as continue that work, bringing greater liquidity and trading volume to the DEX.
The Proposal is live on the Blockchain.
https://www.dexbot.info/2018/12/12/cabinet-multisig-dexbot-wp2/
Cryptick
237
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] kennybll-accnt
« on: December 17, 2018, 02:11:42 pm »
Please setup a block producer for public testnet and have that approved first!
238
Technical Support / Re: Bitshares JS market trade history
« on: December 17, 2018, 02:10:55 pm »
Try this format:
2018-12-17T15:00:00
note that **T** in the middle
2018-12-17T15:00:00
note that **T** in the middle
239
General Discussion / Re: make sure margin call price lower than market price at least 2%
« on: December 17, 2018, 02:10:03 pm »I think everybody have learned from the mistake that margin call price shouldn't higer than market price.Agreed.
please vote out those witness still manipulate the feed price.
@xeroc @openledger @michaelx
My motivation to not act is purely based on the desire to not cause a global settlement on bitCNY.
I do intend to act once the dust of latest market moves has settled a bit
240
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Fee Schedule Proposal] - New fee schedule
« on: December 17, 2018, 12:30:09 pm »Understood. Then I agree with the schedule. And if the smart tech guys tell me @xeroc's scripts work accurately then I support.It did not. Though it wasn't my fault
The scripts used the core exchange rate to derive a BTS value from USD value. That makes sense because it meant that people actually paying fees in bitUSD would pay the correct amount, and BTS is slightly cheaper.
However, due to global settlement, the CER is not at GS price.
I fixed that and expect to revert back (the script) when bitUSD is out of GS again
