Some time ago I wrote a post about dilution in communication channels -
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=21637.0I had a feeling, that we should have better tool for work (personally I like slack, but it doesn't metter)
And then
@xeroc respond me:
How could we possible create a decentralized ecosystem if we have a centralized gathering point that has had outages already?
Can you guys remember what happend when bitcointalk went down?
I don't think it is a bad idea to have multiple communication channels .. every new user can pick whatevery they like most ..
And I think, this is true. This is decentralize project with a lot of aspects. Tool which can be good for talking about marketing can be terrible to talk about code, etc. I think we should change perspective. Instead trying to figure out what is the best for whole community, try to find what is the best tool to my team. In general I think,
we should focus about teams.It is very difficult to perform any serious job when you are just one. Projects like Bitshares require a lot of time and effort to even understand a basics. This is can be very overwhelming when you are working alone. I think we should try to build our community from the bottom. Choose a people who would like take some kind of leadership, and allow them looking on project from higher perspective.
Bitshares project from technology point of view is decentralized... but right now I fell that our community is distributed.
I know that this post become a off topic, so to summary my thoughts: sure... Basecamp can be used for one team, but I don't see a reason why this should become a tool for managing whole project.