(This thread does NOT discuss the fee schedule but opens the discussion for new features to allow more granularity in fees)
During the creation of the current fee schedule as few points came up
that could allow more flexibility and a more natural fee schedule if
they were implemented. Here they are:
* Have a way to define which operation requires LTM and which do not.
For instance, we could say that assets can only be created by LTMs but
the committee could open up asset creation for basic members for a
short period of time.
* Give the committee a means to define which operations pay into the
referral program and which do not. This could even be extended such
that they can choose a precentage split between: network, referal
program, FBA, funding account etc. Replace "committee" with issuer in
the above, we could allow the issue to topup from the network fee and
allow them to define additional fees for some operations that involve
their asset and the corresponding fees to be payed not only to the
network, but also to be split between: the referral program, an
account or a FBA.
* we need a way to distinguish fees for MPA, UIA, and Prediction markets
* It may be useful to have a way to set the fee for
withdraw_permission_claim to be either percentage-based on the amount
to claim, or to be dependend on the time that they vest their
balance.
Any further ideas?