10% for AGS and 10% for PTS ?
Don't you remember what happened when COB wanted to give us 10% for bitshares-music?
The majority was not satisfied and guess what? It changed to 35% each...
How much % gave freetrade for lotto shares? (doesn't matter it was not successful)
How much for DNS?
So why are you all happy right now with 10% ?
Not to mention that the $5 milion marketcap of PTS don't reflects the real value of AGS/PTS in my opinion ...
as I explained here https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10181.msg134374#msg134374
PS I am positive for the merge to happen but I think right now it's not fair for both PTS and AGS holders/donators... Maybe and I hope I am wrong...
After all 10% was the minimum, why not get with the maximum % or at least with a percenatge between... I thought bytemaster would suggest to give the max support to AGS/PTS holders/donators since he is the only one (maybe) that knows exactly how important it was to get a dream to a reality because of the early supporters.
I don't think the 10/10 AGS/PTS social contract applies here.
BTS isn't a new dac. Its an existing fairly successful dac absorbing lesser unproven/nonexistent dacs.
For example, If i release a dac and honored 35%/35% to AGS/PTS and that dac does nothing and has little to no value compared to BTS. If BTS absorbs my new dac I would not expect to get 35% of BTS. Even 10% would be way too much. I am not entitled to anything from BTS via social contract. Shares in BTS are being gifted to replace the value I got from the 35/35 distribution to my lesser dac.
The percentage for absorption only relates to the relative value against BTS and has nothing to do with a social contract. Regardless of the percentage for absorption every member of the absorbed dac retains there relative socially contracted percentage of the absorbed value.
So for absorbed dacs we should not be talking about the social contract because it was already applied. The argument should be about what is the relative value against BTS.
For AGS and PTS absorption, it's a different question. But again, I believe the social contract does not apply. It's a matter of relative value.