Again dump on poloniex which caused again the price drop.

On huobi you can see somebody is trying to add sellpressure using 250k BTS without selling them



Here next bigger dump coming

http://bts.ai/u/avg2907

Quote from: Thul3 on August 31, 2019, 12:08:43 am

Quote from: binggo on August 31, 2019, 12:06:16 am

Quote from: Thul3 on August 30, 2019, 11:58:40 pm

AVG moving again 2 million BTS to poloniex.From there again bigger amount to Binance.

The true is, we can't stop him.

Maybe he like to do these thing.

A liquid market of major assets and arbitrage bot could stop it.
In my opinion a key factor for bitshares to stop these dumps and create real price support.
Getting active instead of waiting.

That's need fund and more BTC or USDT, we can't afford for this.

or make the Bitusd/BTS market more active.

BitUSD won't quickly support price on CEX.
Question is what is better to invest $50k for trading (not spending) to catch the dumps or keep losing each time 5% of all debt on DEX.

Whats cheaper for the debt holders and what is more supportive for the BTS price

AVG moving again 2 million BTS to poloniex.From there again bigger amount to Binance.

I would like to officaly propose myself as committee as i belive the spirit in the committee is gone and it's time to replace some inactive committee members to get the spirit back.
My desire is that the committee gets more pro active to get bitshares targeted back to top.
Currently an active price support would be my main focus as i consider currently the debt holders as one of the most important key factors on bitshares. 
My desire would be also a better communcation between "foreigners" and "chinese" members because in my opinion it currently gets in a wrong direction even i agree that limiting spending supports
the BTS price.

Hope i will get your vote to hopefully be able to make some positive changes with some great people who are already there.


Committee Name    B-DEX

Just to inform i removed my vote for witness ioex because he offered profit sharing which many members and myself included told him this will make us not vote for him.

Seeing his permanet afford trying to join witness ,participating in discussion,upgrading his hardware and removing his profit share concept made me reward his positiv development.


With regret i will take my vote back from ioex

3.公会今后支持的节点，在节点质量合格的前提下，公会将谋求捐赠（分红）。目前公会节点ioex，入选后将给公会捐赠30％收入。今后节点数量还将增加。

Since today bitshares price tanked again from $0.035 to 0.0325 i was checking where it was caused.
Based on CMC Data it catched instantly my attention that poloniex has unnatural high volume .
I checked the BTS charts on poloniex and could see there was a big amount of BTS dumped on their market which couldn''t be seen on any other major exchange like Huobi or Binance.
You can see that many BTS have been send from poloniex to Binance during dump.Arbitrage or mirrored offer.
You can also see each time avg2907 is sending bigger amounts of BTS to poloniex at the same day a dump on poloniex accured.
You can also see on poloniex wallet that each time he sent a bigger amount to poloniex a few hours later bigger amounts of BTS (before dump) were sent to Huobi-Pro , ZB , AEX , Binance

Please check yourself and give your input to it

His profil
http://bts.ai/u/avg2907

Poloniex wallet
http://bts.ai/u/poloniexwallet


CMC screenshot




Dump today




Dump before.Please check each time avg2907 is sending bigger amount of BTS to poloniex at the same day accures a big dump

Quote from: clockwork on August 28, 2019, 01:41:19 pm

Quote from: Thul3 on August 28, 2019, 12:54:35 pm

I would choose Crypviser with real ground breaking blockchain communication and security technology based on bitshares instead of bitspark.
A registered company based in Germany/Switzerland which is trying to comply with all regulations.

Crypviser has also the advantage that they can explain why they switched from Ethereum to Bitshares and have a fully working product.

Can be added if there is no interest from the CN community in the end. TBF, crypviser is running on a bitshares/graphene fork rather than bitshares itself and news has been slow in the last year which is why  it wasn't considered yet. I'd much rather showcase businesses running ON the actual bitshares blockchain.

I agree that it makes less sense if it's a fork.

valid point