I really like 'Certain Assets' .......it quite subtly piqued my interest and prepared my mind for making important distinctions.....
The posts are well reasoned, interesting and informative with an exciting general direction.
One small but important criticism, check spelling and grammar to remove the occasional error. It's worth the effort!
As to the blockchain subject, I agree that all blockchains could be DAPs but not all DAPs are blockchains, but I hope you'll discuss the importance of the rules (economics, execution, security, governance, scope etc) governing the blockchain. Without a strong consensus for the rules/constitution governing the blockchain and the means by which it adapts, the blockchain/network/DAP will have limited utility/robustness/longevity. The blockchain and constitution are inextricably linked because that is where the trust for a trustless network lies. I know I keep saying it, but trust is everything.
Anyway, keep going!