1066
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 【喂价讨论】动态调整最低抵押率要求和爆仓惩罚
« on: September 15, 2018, 07:25:56 pm »接下去需要搞搞bitUSD了,bitUSD溢价依然严重,现在和bitCNY汇率都7.2了。。。
bitUSD没有承兑商,这是硬伤,可以先缓缓,现在bitCNY还缺乏一个暴跌的试验
没有承兑商不是什么大问题,只要锚定得足够好,自然会有很多场合很多人会选用。
前几天BTS也不是没有暴跌过。
拖延没什么意义。
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
接下去需要搞搞bitUSD了,bitUSD溢价依然严重,现在和bitCNY汇率都7.2了。。。
bitUSD没有承兑商,这是硬伤,可以先缓缓,现在bitCNY还缺乏一个暴跌的试验
Disable force settlement and global settlement, Are you mad?
You initially said the 5% force settlement was a temporary measure, that was a year ago. Bitshares is a protocol you can't keep changing the rules for your own interests even as a big whale.
As someone else said, make your own CNY smartcoin don't try and change the committee assets.
How can someone have faith in a stablecoin when the rules change every year.
It is not possible to disable black swans.
This latest idea together with all the experiments and tweaking have taken bitCNY so far away from the original idea of BitShares' smartcoins that it would make sense to introduce a new kind of smartcoin tailored to your needs.
What will be the next proposal to cancel black swan events ?
you are right, I am considering to cancel black swan events.
Maybe you should focus on adoption instead of manipulation ?
What will be the next proposal to cancel black swan events ?
with BTS price going down, bitCNY are squeezed out, risk and capital cost of shorts increase. but demand change slowly than that, all these lead to higher premium and vice versa.
that's one problem of smartcoin, when premium go farer from 0 there's nothing to stimulate the premium to go toward 0, and that's why we now try the negative feed back price feeding, hope that can help.
Keep in mind that margin called short positions create automatic demand, and the amount of poorly collateralized bitCNY short positions is the biggest reason for the premium.
The whole theory of bitassets is based upon the premium. If bitXY trades with a premium there is an incentive for shorters to create (and sell) more bitXY, which brings the premium down. If bitXY trades below par there is an incentive for shorters to buy up cheap bitXY and close their positions. In both cases, the market price is driven towards par. Therefore it doesn't make sense to claim that nothing stimulates the premium - the premium exists to stimulate market participants.