0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: .yoshi on April 10, 2015, 03:49:27 amQuote from: nomoreheroes7 on April 10, 2015, 03:41:56 amUgh, again with the BTC38 FUD. So damn tired of them having so much control over the price. Why the hell dont we have volume anywhere else?? I just dont get how we can have such an awesome decentralized system wrapped in the hands of a single centralized exchange...makes no sense.Yup, truly a shame. When shit hit the fan with BTER I was hoping Yunbi would pick up the slack but.... nope.At least we've got https://blocktrades.us/ and https://metaexchange.info/
Quote from: nomoreheroes7 on April 10, 2015, 03:41:56 amUgh, again with the BTC38 FUD. So damn tired of them having so much control over the price. Why the hell dont we have volume anywhere else?? I just dont get how we can have such an awesome decentralized system wrapped in the hands of a single centralized exchange...makes no sense.Yup, truly a shame. When shit hit the fan with BTER I was hoping Yunbi would pick up the slack but.... nope.
Ugh, again with the BTC38 FUD. So damn tired of them having so much control over the price. Why the hell dont we have volume anywhere else?? I just dont get how we can have such an awesome decentralized system wrapped in the hands of a single centralized exchange...makes no sense.
this summer
Quote from: clayop on April 10, 2015, 03:36:35 amQuote from: clayop on April 10, 2015, 03:29:44 amIMO, we again need to have BTC38 to prove their BTS solvency. If BTC38 is playing with customers fund, lying the number, we should take an action.paging @btswildpigI doubt they'll play it at a small market (BTC-BTS pair) . CNY is where the volume is . I suspect the graph you're looking at is a result of a trading bot runs really fast , that it can generate operation logs (history) , but it's too fast to allow the web page's order book to properly displayed in a limited time frame .
Quote from: clayop on April 10, 2015, 03:29:44 amIMO, we again need to have BTC38 to prove their BTS solvency. If BTC38 is playing with customers fund, lying the number, we should take an action.paging @btswildpig
IMO, we again need to have BTC38 to prove their BTS solvency. If BTC38 is playing with customers fund, lying the number, we should take an action.
For several hours, buy orders with amount of around 0.55 BTC at 0.000023 BTC are continuing but there is no change in order book.