Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sadrachss

Pages: [1]
1
BitShares PTS / Re: Have I lost my PTS?
« on: February 20, 2014, 09:39:20 am »
You've not lost your PTS, you've just not sent the transaction to the network, it looks like.

If your client shows you as connected (you left out the bottom where we could tell on your screenshot) just restarting your client might be enough.

If you can't get connected the most recent version of the ProtoShares/Bitshares PTS software might help.

Thanks thisisausername,
Resolved.
Updated the client and confirmed. I just thought it was still strange getting the mines normally and had already made some submissions to the old version and not had this problem.

Regards,
Sadrachss

2
BitShares PTS / [Solved] Have I lost my PTS?
« on: February 20, 2014, 03:37:58 am »
I sent the little that I received this week from mining to BTER to make trade, but until now there has been no confirmation.

Status: 0/no confirmed
Date: 02/19/2014 23:00
To: Pp3MBSeM9BXFLjR1qVxDKcMieLoWTcZ69q
Debit: -1.2229275 PTS
Net value: -1.2229275 PTS
Transaction ID: ae7030b2c5d97d83050f3edf6515bbc69c9e95eb22cfe97bef9ce02313800c4b


The Id of the transaction I found odd and I can not find the block - explorer. The wallet has been sent to beats and I can see the block - explorer and has no transaction.

Can anyone tell me what might be happening?

Print
http://prntscr.com/2u3xjg

Regards,
Sadrachss

3
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 04, 2014, 04:27:21 pm »
me too failed to connect

Agora foi!

[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 00ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 38981803 <-> 44177352 #34 @ 1391531119 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Feb-04 16:25:22 | 170.0 c/m | 5.0 sh/m | VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 56451998 <-> 7280068 #510 @ 1391531344 by 16
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Feb-04 16:26:41 | 536.3 c/m | 1.3 sh/m | VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)


EDIT.

Fully working!

4
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 04, 2014, 04:19:28 pm »
Here is still not connecting ...

[WORKER13] GoGoGo!
[WORKER14] GoGoGo!
[WORKER15] GoGoGo!
[WORKER16] GoGoGo!
[WORKER17] GoGoGo!
[WORKER18] GoGoGo!
[WORKER19] GoGoGo!
[WORKER20] GoGoGo!
[WORKER21] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
system:111

5
Could someone give me a hand with CentOS 6_64x?
I set up with Ubuntu, but I have a server that uses centOS and as I'm not using all his power, going back to mine PTS.

= D

Regards,
Sadrachss

6
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?

Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40
If you look through this thread you'll notice that plenty of people have noticed that.

beer has good and bad days, like any pool. Just because we are slow in finding a block does not mean you get paid less. You get a share equal to the work you put in just like any other pool.



It could be thought like this:
- It takes 20 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $1,000 for their work. It takes 10 days to build this car and sell it.
- It takes 10 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $2,000 for their work, but now it takes 20 days to built the car and sell it because there are less people working on it.

In the first scenario, the men (or women) would each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $1,000 / 10 = $100.
In the second scenario, the men (or women) would also each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $2,000 / 20 = $100.



It takes longer to find a block than the larger pools because we don't have as many miners. But having less miners pays better per block because we don't have to share out the block reward to as many other miners as the big pools.

Yeah, the way will be to continue drinking beer ...
I went to see other pools and are in the same way seems.
I know that. But it is not just happening in beeeeer. The others are too slow ...

What I found odd was that even before he had more PTS per block and it is falling faster.

Thanks!
A certain pool *cough*ypool*cough* is dominating the PTS pools with it's absurd amount of miners. All the smaller pools are suffering because of it and with the advent of GPU mining, it just means they maintain their stronghold. Pools like rpool and 1gh are in the same boat as they have similar miner numbers as beer.

And yes you are correct - the only way to resolve this is to drink more beer... :)

Yeah * cough * cough * but has 6% fee...
And I with 3 VPS 8vCores and 50GB of ram each sieve there ...
It was a test did not yield anything to me and I lost $ $

I'd rather stay where I am for a long time by the way. Here!
Let's drink more beeeeer

7
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?

Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40
If you look through this thread you'll notice that plenty of people have noticed that.

beer has good and bad days, like any pool. Just because we are slow in finding a block does not mean you get paid less. You get a share equal to the work you put in just like any other pool.



It could be thought like this:
- It takes 20 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $1,000 for their work. It takes 10 days to build this car and sell it.
- It takes 10 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $2,000 for their work, but now it takes 20 days to built the car and sell it because there are less people working on it.

In the first scenario, the men (or women) would each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $1,000 / 10 = $100.
In the second scenario, the men (or women) would also each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $2,000 / 20 = $100.



It takes longer to find a block than the larger pools because we don't have as many miners. But having less miners pays better per block because we don't have to share out the block reward to as many other miners as the big pools.

Yeah, the way will be to continue drinking beer ...
I went to see other pools and are in the same way seems.
I know that. But it is not just happening in beeeeer. The others are too slow ...

What I found odd was that even before he had more PTS per block and it is falling faster.

Thanks!

8
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?

Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40

9
MemoryCoin / Re: mmcpool.com - CLOUD MINING GUIDE!
« on: January 06, 2014, 10:13:50 pm »
What is happening with the pool it is taking so well to generate blocks?

Was so fast before and stopped. Does anybody know?
GPU mining killed it.
You can see the HPM of the 2 pools and compare:
http://mmcpool.com/en
http://mmc.1gh.com/
Also, it was the only stable pool for a while so most people mined there.

http://mmcpool.com/en/ bestest pool ever  8)

I have 4 VPS 8 cores each and 60GB of ram. AMD FX 4.8gh
Was going well, but enters the GPU and discouraged. I'll put them to PTS that is better.  >:(
My Rig is for LTC and will not change to MMC.

10
MemoryCoin / Re: mmcpool.com - CLOUD MINING GUIDE!
« on: January 06, 2014, 05:39:16 pm »
What is happening with the pool it is taking so well to generate blocks?

Was so fast before and stopped. Does anybody know?

11
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 28, 2013, 07:58:13 am »
good morning, backend is down, i'm working on it.

/edit:
it should be ok now
i'm sorry for the inconvenience

Returned to mine. Rejecting enough, but returned.
That's what matters!  :)

Thanks!

12
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 28, 2013, 07:40:04 am »
Beeeer.org for PTS is down?
Here not connect more ...

Outside it began to reject all since yesterday also ources

[WORKER2] GoGoGo!
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
[WORKER3] GoGoGo!
[WORKER4] GoGoGo!
[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
[WORKER6] GoGoGo!
[WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER7] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337


Anyone else with this problem?

13
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net - Fast PTS pool
« on: December 19, 2013, 10:57:12 pm »
Hi,
I can not compile, only the error. I've tried all that I know Makes

All give the same error.

I've tried with ubuntu 12:04 LTS 32
12.04x86_64 LTS

I am using VPS

make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native"
make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=corei7"
make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=generic"
make CFLAGS="-O3"
make CFLAGS="-g"

make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.

Does anyone have any idea what I can do?
Is he doing some library?

Thanks

EDIT:
Version: https://github.com/jh000/jhProtominer


The former gave this error

bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32
bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32
collisions/min: 300.2326 Shares total: 0
bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32
bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32
collisions/min: 310.3344 Shares total: 0
bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32
bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32
collisions/min: 315.1476 Shares total: 0
bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32
collisions/min: 309.9745 Shares total: 0
bitclient_calculateMerkleRoot: Too many transactions, numberOfTx set to 32


Found in Hoe To this he had improved to more collisions / min...

Pages: [1]