376
General Discussion / Re: Consensus on the list of delegates
« on: February 03, 2015, 04:15:56 pm »That would be true if there was only one delegate.This whole thread has been focused on the implausible scenario in which most delegates are compromised. Exploring handling for such extreme cases is healthy, but it's important to keep the probability context in mind.
Actually the thread was derailed with bribery example. The point was supposed to be - if delegates control the only medium of exchange then this channel cannot be used for sending information that affect the delegates.
EDIT: Also nice to confirm that your original purpose here was to attack the system, not to understand it as you said in your OP. :-P