BitShares Forum
Other => Graveyard => BitShares PTS => Topic started by: archit on January 10, 2014, 07:37:02 am
-
This doesn't work at all on AMD cards, if you are looking for that go here - https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2296.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2296.0)
Requirements:
Nvidia GPU with Compute capability higher than 20(post 1.0d 11 should work)
CPU (Post 1.0c any processor works)
Latest Nvidia driver
I have only included the binaries for now, I will release the source code after I get a donation of 10 PTS. The miner mines 500 rounds for user and then 15 rounds to support developer. Default -o is ypool.net. Use highperf if you have more than 1.2 GB of GPU memory. Please note that SLI support is not tested yet.
Usage:
arCUDAminer.exe -u archit.pts_1 -p x -m avx -g 2
-g User only if more than 1 GPU eg.2
-u Worker
-p Worker password
-m avx or sse4 or sph(lower caps)
-o Address of pool
Why this?
- 64 bit
- extremly small fee
- Point to your pool of choice
An explanation of different build:
- normal- Default build, should be used with gpu < 1 GB memory and not Compute 3.5
- normal_highperf - Used with GPU memory > 1.2 GB and Compute <3.5
- cm35 and cm35_highperf - Same as above but for Compute 3.5, Don't use cm35_highperf there seems to be something wrong with it
What happened to cm3 builds?
The newer build is supposed to work best on all architectures except 3.5 but if you want it back just post and I will compile it again
(http://gyazo.com/817a5c3a2de95264ded3521e10602dc1.png)
Please donate on
PTS:Pn9b5y2FRpAn4V94gTLjxJ9eSQkeuuU6GP
Links are to two of the best versions (Chose either one)
1.0c : http://www.mediafire.com/download/3bjkrfabhxjmbw1 (http://www.mediafire.com/download/3bjkrfabhxjmbw1)
1.0e : http://www.mediafire.com/download/5u2ptviwm56anby (http://www.mediafire.com/download/5u2ptviwm56anby)
How much you donate can be seen from the live workers page on ypool
If you get a malloc error, make sure you have more than 800 MB of free video memory
-
Based on the screen shot, still only available for cuda?
-
Apparently yup
-
Waiting...
-
Done
-
report:
msi gtx660 hawk
about 460 cpm
-
I'm not even going to bother until there is one for AMD GPU's. :(
-
I tried to run it on a GTX680 box, and a Quadro FX 2800M laptop, both failed:
.......
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Invalid mode!
-
report:
msi gtx660 hawk
about 460 cpm
Same here, was able to get 600+ with the other miner.
-
works good :) getting 250coll/m on old gts 450 :)
thanks archit
-
I tried to run it on a GTX680 box, and a Quadro FX 2800M laptop, both failed:
.......
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Invalid mode!
use avx or sse4 in lower caps
-
Good job archit, I get 465 coll/m on my old GTX 560
-
Working great :) 450 - 460 c/m on GTX 675M 750@1900 MHz
-
use avx or sse4 in lower caps
failed too, but the message is different:
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Using SSE4
Could not attach to CUDA device 0: 35
-
Hi
waiting for download link so i can test it on 550ti & 465 GTX
-
I think ypool is the No.1 pts pool.
If this GPU miner stick to it, is it will be an 51%?
-
Hi
can anyone post win binaries so i can test it.
Thanks
-
bravo!
-
What time can download Ha greatly
-
Hi can you release a version that works on AMD cpus? Thanks! Ill try to compile the cudapts for windows anyway.
-
waiting for a link to DL,good job
-
Waiting for a link :)
-
when log says
xpt: Logged in with [mywokername]
New block data - height: 41036 tx count: 6
and windows pops up a windows says arCUDAminer.exe has stop working, and only have one button to close the program
-
It has been updated now, try today
-
when log says
xpt: Logged in with [mywokername]
New block data - height: 41036 tx count: 6
and windows pops up a windows says arCUDAminer.exe has stop working, and only have one button to close the program
try updated ver and no luck, same
-
Your processor?
-
I have same problem, windows says arCUDAminer.exe has stop working, I think the reason comes from the CPU, I use AMD A8-3850 , no AVX, no SSE4, so sad
-
Anyone hitting this malloc error?
C:\CUDA>arCUDAminer.exe -u derekleong75.13 -p 13
赏屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯突
? arCUDAminer (v0.1) ?
? author: jh,dga and ported by archit ?
? http://ypool.net ?
韧屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯图
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Using AVX
Mining one round for developer
Initializing. Device has 763166720 free of 1073741824 total bytes of memory
Could not malloc dev_data (2)
-
no avx, no sse4 no can do :/
Just restart it, it happens
-
Your processor?
i5 750 2.67G
-
Work!
Win 8.1 64bits + GTX 570 (Driver 332.21) + (-m avx) = 630 c/m
-
i5 750 2.67G + GTX770
use -m sse4 works
but only get 500-550 speed
i use 32bit ver from abc123 get 850-900 speed
-
Your processor?
i5 750 2.67G
add -m sse4
-
i5 750 2.67G + GTX770
use -m sse4 works
but only get 500-550 speed
i use 32bit ver from abc123 get 850-900 speed
That's because it's for higher end GPU. This works for all
-
That's because it's for higher end GPU. This works for all
i get it, thank you ;)
-
anyone encountered this malloc error?
C:\CUDA>arCUDAminer.exe -u derekleong75.13 -p 13
赏屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯突
? arCUDAminer (v0.1) ?
? author: jh,dga and ported by archit ?
? http://ypool.net ?
韧屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯屯图
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Using AVX
Mining one round for developer
Initializing. Device has 763166720 free of 1073741824 total bytes of memory
Could not malloc dev_data (2)
-
In my experience it happens sometimes and fixes the next time I restart it
-
New high performance version
-
Hi
i am still getting "Could not malloc dev_data (2)" error even after restart and trying to run miner for 20 times.
GTX 550
I3 550
-
The drivers are updated?
-
Yes
-
New high performance version
i'll try it
-
Only uses ~40% of my GPU. (Bounces between 100% load and 0% load).
Running nvidia GTX 760 on AVX capable CPU (xeon e5).
Estimated 420 CPM.
Any ideas?
-
hi it tell me that i don't have msvcr110.dll, but i actually have in my 64bit system folder, but i found it read my 32bit system folder which don't have and even it had, still was wrong.
Any idea?
-
New high performance version
i5 750 + GTX 770
normal ver 500-550
performance ver 550-600
-
CPU - 2600K
GPU Usade - 80~90%
arCUDAminer.exe - Win 8.1 64bits + GTX 570 (Driver 332.21) + (avx) = 645~650 c/m
arCUDAminer_highperf.exe - Win 8.1 64bits + GTX 570 (Driver 332.21) + (avx) = 615 c/m
-
i5 750 + GTX 770 in 32bit windows using miner from abc123
(http://ww1.sinaimg.cn/large/73e2139bgw1ecevcntxd0j213r0owwm9.jpg)
i5 750 + GTX 770 in 64bit windows using miner from arhit
(http://ww2.sinaimg.cn/large/73e2139bgw1ecevf9kpfyj213w0oxn3x.jpg)
-
Hi
i am still getting "Could not malloc dev_data (2)" error even after restart and trying to run miner for 20 times.
GTX 550
I3 550
i'm on i3-2100 and gtx 550 ti... with the malloc error
-
i find a way to run GTX 770 at 950 c/m
i opened both 64bit miner from archit and 32bit miner from abc123
now have 530 c/m with archit's and 420 c/m with abc123's
add up is 950 c/m
EDIT: those numbers drops :) still got 880 c/m max
-
New update which should further improve performance. No more SPH use
-
Speed report, feature request, and fix report:
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2x (two cards) init string:
arCUDAminer_highperf.exe -o http://ypool.net:10034 -u myUsername.myWorkername 1 -p x -m sse4
Result:
~320 c/m; but it would be ~640 c/m if it recognized both cards (GPU activity only spikes on CUDA device 0). How do I tell it to use the second card? Maybe that's a needed command-line option (with supporting program logic? :/
Thanks! Sending donation, and more will be forthcoming from mining results (on top of the 20 rounds/day this mines).
At first run attempt it threw a missing .dll error. I fixed that by installing "Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012;" from here: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679 (http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679).
archit, I suggest you update the OP to state/link to that requirement (and/or compile in/distribute whatever supporting .dlls it requires). I installed the x86 and x64 variants (not sure if this requires either/both).
[I swear I read a post by someone else who got the same .dll error? I think installing that vcrdist will fix it.]
-
Does not work with AMD i am getting app crash.
running newest version of Drivers & running gtx 460 on windows 7 64 bit
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: arCUDAminer.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 52d035fa
Fault Module Name: arCUDAminer.exe
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 52d035fa
Exception Code: c000001d
Exception Offset: 000000000000fd11
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 5401
Additional Information 2: 54010252e771f84ebb456a1314eea577
Additional Information 3: f762
Additional Information 4: f76286a4609e3a3a9a427e437313b534
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
-
Getting 1300c/m with a 780
-
We need gpu load =100% not 85%
-
it's not very stable and will crash at random here in my computer
sometimes within 15 minutes it will crash, sometimes within 1 hour.
sys info:
win7 x64
vc2005 vc2010x86 vc2010x64 vc2012x86 vc2012x64 installed
gtx760 + i7 4770K + 8G mem
-
Here is stable!
-
Link is down, can you report current build?
-
Does not work with AMD i am getting app crash.
running newest version of Drivers & running gtx 460 on windows 7 64 bit
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: arCUDAminer.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 52d035fa
Fault Module Name: arCUDAminer.exe
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 52d035fa
Exception Code: c000001d
Exception Offset: 000000000000fd11
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 5401
Additional Information 2: 54010252e771f84ebb456a1314eea577
Additional Information 3: f762
Additional Information 4: f76286a4609e3a3a9a427e437313b534
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
Which processor?
New update for SHA512 optimizations
-
We need gpu load =100% not 85%
Some of the algorithms used are serial and so it's better to offload them to CPU
-
I receive ~450 CPM on high-performance and ~400 CPM on regular.
Using GTX 760 and Xeon e5-2680 (AVX). Is this normal speeds?
-
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Using AVX
Initializing. Device has 2081554432 free of -2147483648 total bytes of memory
New block data - height: 41181 tx count: 4
Could not memcpy dev_hashes out (30)
Something went wrong, reinitating
Initializing. Device has 0 free of 0 total bytes of memory
Could not malloc dev_data (30)
What's the reason? the previous version works just good.
-
It's not stable enough. I tested it twice and it can work but will crash within 1 or 2 hour. And my sys is win7 64, E3 1230v3, gtx460.
Looking forward to update
-
It's not stable enough. I tested it twice and it can work but will crash within 1 or 2 hour. And my sys is win7 64, E3 1230v3, gtx460.
Looking forward to update
I'm currently trying to fix that only right now and add support for multiple graphic cards.
Please donate to me on:
PTS:Pn9b5y2FRpAn4V94gTLjxJ9eSQkeuuU6GP
-
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Using SSE4
Initializing. Device has -1304317952 free of -1073741824 total bytes of memory
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1248.5714 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1032.0000 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1216.5217 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1245.8065 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1226.1538 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1220.0000 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1237.8571 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1262.5000 Shares total: 0
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1255.0000 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1228.0000 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1241.3636 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1253.7500 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1276.9231 Shares total: 2
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Mining 20 round for developer
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
Mining rounds for user
collisions/min: 1270.0000 Shares total: 3
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1264.0000 Shares total: 3
collisions/min: 1248.4375 Shares total: 3
collisions/min: 1250.5882 Shares total: 3
collisions/min: 1251.6667 Shares total: 3
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1245.5263 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1251.2500 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1250.7143 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1250.9091 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1258.2609 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1260.6250 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1259.8000 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1256.7308 Shares total: 4
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Mining 20 round for developer
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1251.6667 Shares total: 5
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Mining rounds for user
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1251.7857 Shares total: 6
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1253.4483 Shares total: 7
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1263.5000 Shares total: 8
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1252.0968 Shares total: 10
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1251.2500 Shares total: 11
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1255.9091 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1249.7059 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1243.8571 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1236.2500 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1234.7297 Shares total: 13
gpu at 48oC, 50% power
(and does this take like 10% of rounds???)
-
It's not stable enough. I tested it twice and it can work but will crash within 1 or 2 hour. And my sys is win7 64, E3 1230v3, gtx460.
Looking forward to update
the same, look forward to more stable updates
It seems to have some relationships with user exchange or networking issue. most of the time, my arCUDAminer crashes when user changing or back online after drop
(http://v2.freep.cn/3tb_1401111327344lh5512293.jpg)
-
Thanks for that screenshot, you just helped me find a bug
-
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ arCUDAminer (v0.1) ║
║ author: jh,dga and ported by archit ║
║ http://ypool.net ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Using SSE4
Initializing. Device has 816803840 free of 1073741824 total bytes of memory
Could not malloc dev_data (2)
i7 950 gtx 465 :/ any clues?
-
another question report:
If I start the arCUDAminer and the cpu miner(yam) at the same computer, yam will be very unstable(drop offline very often), would you please check this?
config:
4930K running yam with 11 threads
gtx760 running arCUDAminer
please tell me if any further info needed.
p.s.
if start arCUDAminer first, then yam will drop offline very often
if start yam first, then arCUDAminer will drop offline very often.
-
Some parts are still done on CPU though this would be fixed soon
New update with SLI support, stability fixes, even lower fee and donated share counter soon!
-
v0.4 arCUDAminer works great but I still can't get arCUDAminer_highperf to work, exits with error: Could not malloc dev_data (2)
GTX 560 Ti
-
It won't, read the post carefully. It requires your graphic card to have more than 1.2 GB of memory at least
-
Some parts are still done on CPU though this would be fixed soon
New update with SLI support, stability fixes, even lower fee and donated share counter soon!
maybe because of socket?
another suggestion:
every time after developer round, ypool's worker explorer will reset so I cannot get the exact share/hour value at ypool, will you update and do not disturb the ypool's worker monitor?
-
New update should have fixed that
-
New update should have fixed that
v0.4 is still crashing when drop offline :-[
-
Screenshot please
-
Screenshot please
(http://v1.freep.cn/3tb_140111220025qfod512293.png)
I snapshot the yam with arCUDAminer v0.4 as well
-
Use the newer version I just psoted
-
There is no way to use 100% gpu?
Win 8.1 64bits + GTX 570
arCUDAminer 0.4v
GPU Usade = 82~90%
Total = 665 c/m
PtsGPUz0.2ab
GPU Usade = 99~100%
Total = 820 c/m
-
Use the newer version I just psoted
Now running
maybe you can add version in the file/zip name to avoid confusion since there are so many updates :)
-
New update should increase stability and higher performance
-
There is no way to use 100% gpu?
Win 8.1 64bits + GTX 570
arCUDAminer 0.4v
GPU Usade = 82~90%
Total = 665 c/m
PtsGPUz0.2ab
GPU Usade = 99~100%
Total = 820 c/m
I will see what I can do
-
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
-
Restart the miner, known bug
-
Use the newer version I just psoted
v0.6 seems to be stable but yam is still dropping :-[
-
Yam + arCUDAminer 64 bit v0.6 stable here!
arCUDAminer 64 bit v0.6
GTX 570
arCUDAminer = 690 c/m
arCUDAminer_highperf = 660~665 c/m
Congratulations, v0.6 has improved 25 c/m
-
Yam + arCUDAminer 64 bit v0.6 stable here! :)
arCUDAminer 64 bit v0.6
GTX 570
arCUDAminer = 690 c/m
arCUDAminer_highperf = 660~665 c/m
Congratulations, v0.6 has improved 25 c/m
so there's some problem with my networking?
let me try...
-
Network down = arCUDAminer close
-
Hmm I will update it then
I am looking to add openCL support too, soon
-
Network down = arCUDAminer close
v0.6 highpref, crashed just now
-
sohueasy-Did it run for once?
-
sohueasy-Did it run for once?
the first time v0.6 directly crash and I ignored it and run it for the 2nd time
after several minutes it crashes with the same situation I screenshot before
-
Which pool are you using? And you are using the v0.6, right?
-
New update coming soon with support for OpenCL
-
the link still points to version 0.4 not 0.6
-
I forgot to change the version string, it's 0.6
-
New update coming soon with support for OpenCL
Looking forward to it.
-
Which pool are you using? And you are using the v0.6, right?
yes, v0.6 at ypool
here is the screenshot
(http://v2.freep.cn/3tb_14011200361584fv512293.png)
p.s.
I have rebooted my computer, route, moden as well to exclude other faults.
-
Got it but i have to sleep now, fix tomorrow for sure
-
New update, I am extremely sorry that it didn't change to mine for user after once switching to developer. This should fix it
-
I can't start the latest one, gives an error Could not malloc dev_data (2)
http://prntscr.com/2ig0is
-
try it again, sometimes it happens randomly also make sure you have atleast 800 MB of free GPU memory
-
I tried several times, no luck and i have 900+ free gpu mem.
I'm back to 0.4
-
i get ~1250 now, maybe 20 or so higher on avg. avx still doesn't work, just sse4
ed: i went back to old version, since ypool was reporting my rate as 15 shares/hr, while on the other one it's close to 100 (well, it averages out to around 100, w/ the frequent disconnects)
-
how many shares does this miner takes for donation and then starting to mine for me again, because what i can see is that it mines 5 shares for me and then the rest is for developer.
-
how many shares does this miner takes for donation and then starting to mine for me again, because what i can see is that it mines 5 shares for me and then the rest is for developer.
yeah, that's what it looked like to me also.. after leaving it going about 30 minutes
-
It takes 500 rounds for user then the 15 rounds for developer and then again 500 rounds for user
-
that might be what it's supposed to do, but not what it is doing
-
yeah it stops mining for the user after a while. I had to go back to V0.4
-
its an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 810 Processor, 2600 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)
Does not work with AMD i am getting app crash.
running newest version of Drivers & running gtx 460 on windows 7 64 bit
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: arCUDAminer.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 52d035fa
Fault Module Name: arCUDAminer.exe
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 52d035fa
Exception Code: c000001d
Exception Offset: 000000000000fd11
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 5401
Additional Information 2: 54010252e771f84ebb456a1314eea577
Additional Information 3: f762
Additional Information 4: f76286a4609e3a3a9a427e437313b534
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
Which processor?
New update for SHA512 optimizations
-
Yeah there was a slight error that caused, it's been fixed in 0.8
-
This is what 0.8 does.
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ arCUDAminer (v0.4) ║
║ author: jh,dga and ported by archit ║
║ http://ypool.net ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Will mine 15 round after 500 to support developerUsing AVX
Initializing. Device has -1457324032 free of -1073741824 total bytes of memory
Connected to server using x.pushthrough(xpt) protocol
New block data - height:
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
Mining for user
Mining for developer :)
-
New update fixed it, it was for debug purpose :P
-
@archit, I keep getting could not connect with cuda device. I am running a GTX 770 and i5 3570k. This is my bat file:
arCUDAminer.exe -o http://ypool.net:10034 -u Mav2000.2 -p x -m avx -g 2
pause
ANything wrong in this?
Ok got that working. I was not supposed to use g 2. But now after trying to mine and finding a share, it says merkelroot is invalid, update your miner..it happens once in a bit, but it seems to happen every few lines... Can some one help me with this. This is with the latest version posted on the first post of the thread.
-
I noticed that it starts getting the invalid shares after switching back to "Mining for users". It says Merkleroot is invalid or corrupted.
Using the newest (0.9v) version. Otherwise, great work and thanks :)
-
Thank you for that, will see what I can do
EDIT: Works just one for me but I will push a new update to make sure that I changed something and didn't upload it
-
Had a go with the new update (v.09b). Still the same problem exist though, works fine until the miner switch back from mining for the donations. Had a couple of cases that donation shares were accepted but everything after that is invalid..hope this helps solving the problem :)
-
Tried something, should help fix it. New update
-
Yeah well, not fixed..everything that goes for donation is accepted and it now mines for the donations really more often...
-
Oops, i should test more new update coming
-
Meh..the same problem still exists..maybe you should turn off the donations until you get them working properly?
-
Yes, please, make it more stable.
I guess i never see norml CUDA miner in my life :(
my GPU is ASUS GTX 760
Initializing. Device has 2051309568 free of -2147483648 total bytes of memory <- It's normal?
-
Let me try the 0.9d version and report back.
Edit: Yup same issue, still finding errors on merkleroot, says update your miner
-
does anyone here has the link for the 0.4 version
-
hi,Archit
0.9d
miner is Unstable and will crash after a few minutes.(after mined for developer )
almost each version.
-
hi,Archit
0.9d
miner is Unstable and will crash after a few minutes.(after mined for developer )
almost each version.
+1
I met the same problem ever since version 0.2.
Can you please make it stable first? Thanks.
-
Can you give me a screenshot?
-
Did someone ever tried running the miner on Win 2003 Sever x64?
I`m getting the following error on the clean Win 2003 Server istallation.
http://postimg.org/image/o252hkhe5/
-
Can you give me a screenshot?
here a link to a image of my miner
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1280x1024q90/22/tqpz.png
-
AVX
(http://www.tu265.com/di-24cbe27057e253b28842ec1d2429b20d.jpg)
AVX highperf
(http://www.tu265.com/di-acb5a98d417cc2bdec4d76540b670f8e.jpg)
SSE4
(http://www.tu265.com/di-b993cc893c6f2d2dc48adafb8d5714d6.jpg)
SSE4 highperf
(http://www.tu265.com/di-f02d0d5ffcee23c2bb8dfc80b3bf94e0.jpg)
GPU:
Win7 Pro
(http://www.tu265.com/di-1d028c2d2bfa5df6eb89580e936a575e.jpg)
-
Still getting the same error, meerkleroot, please update your miner. Any help would be awesome.
BTW, when this happens, do we continue to mine or is it a waste?
-
I am not able to reproduce merkleroot error till now but I will try.
029xue- Do everything in the checklist below then report please
Install the newest drivers
Install CUDA toolkit
Also what is your processor?
-
Can you give me a screenshot?
all crashes happened after the connection lost.
I think the reason is that an unhandled exception occured when the connection lost.
-
it'have some problem,my gpu is GT 750M,but i can't run it
-
could not attach yo cuda device 0:35 my gpu is GT750m *2
-
jackie - What are the arguments?
Everyone with merkleroot, I ran the miner for 6 hours but I had no problems. I will check reconnect though
-
Much better stability - arCUDAminer v1.0a released!
-
now he lost the '-o' option
-
Miner doesn't work on AMD, can you make it compatible with AMD cards?
-
Miner doesn't work on AMD, can you make it compatible with AMD cards?
Check out arOpenCLminer
-
Requirements:
Nvidia GPU with Compute capability higher than 20
CPU with AVX/SSE4 (Not tested with AMD)
Latest Nvidia driver
I have only included the binaries for now, I will release the source code after I get a donation of 10 PTS. The miner mines 500 rounds for user and then 15 rounds to support developer. Default -o is ypool.net. Use highperf if you have more than 1.2 GB of GPU memory. Please note that SLI support is not tested yet.
Usage:
arCUDAminer.exe -u archit.pts_1 -p x -m avx -g 2
-g User only if more than 1 GPU eg.2
-u Worker
-p Worker password
-m avx or sse4(lower caps)
Why this?
- 64 bit
- extremly small fee
- Point to your pool of choice
(http://gyazo.com/817a5c3a2de95264ded3521e10602dc1.png)
Please donate on
PTS:Pn9b5y2FRpAn4V94gTLjxJ9eSQkeuuU6GP
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5vo0xremdgx1ltt/arCUDAminer1.0a.rar (https://www.dropbox.com/s/5vo0xremdgx1ltt/arCUDAminer1.0a.rar)
How much you donate can be seen from the live workers page on ypool
If you get a malloc error, make sure you have more than 800 MB of free video memory
-
now he lost the '-o' option
exactly - why go out of your way to make the software less useful and less widely useable? Unless Ypool has paid you for the software...in which case why are we also paying?
-
Done! Launch as soon as I get access to a computer with AMD GPU
looking forward to this, i'll test it out and compare it to the 1gh pool miner. Will yours be usable on any pool?
It uses XPTv6 and I think only YPool supports that till now so I removed the -o switch but it could be added easily again in future
ok I assume the same reasoning as for the openCL miner - I'll eat my hand or hat or ear or whatever Mike Tyson wants me to eat!
edit - Eat my words!
-
Miner doesn't work on AMD, can you make it compatible with AMD cards?
Check out arOpenCLminer
Need ver. for http://pts.1gh.com/
-
Done! Launch as soon as I get access to a computer with AMD GPU
looking forward to this, i'll test it out and compare it to the 1gh pool miner. Will yours be usable on any pool?
It uses XPTv6 and I think only YPool supports that till now so I removed the -o switch but it could be added easily again in future
ok I assume the same reasoning as for the openCL miner - I'll eat my hand or hat or ear or whatever Mike Tyson wants me to eat!
edit - Eat my words!
I will bring back the '-o' option but don't complain if it doesn't work with all pools
-
Connection attempt failed, retry in 45 seconds
for me is necessary pushthrough(xpt) and port 8080.
is possible enable that?
Can i have a version with 8080 port for test it? pm if you want
-
Hello, I just registered on this forum because I wanted to give you an error report.
GPU Geforce 660 (not TI) 2Gb DDR
CPU AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
The program refuses to start, crashes with a popup message:
[Window Title]
arCUDAminer.exe
[Main Instruction]
arCUDAminer.exe has stopped working
[Content]
A problem caused the program to stop working correctly. Windows will close the program and notify you if a solution is available.
[Close program]
This happens with normal program and highperf either one with avx or sse4.
-
I tried to run it on amazon ec2 and what i get is the following:
Could not attach to CUDA device 0: 35
any solution?
-
I tried to run it on amazon ec2 and what i get is the following:
Could not attach to CUDA device 0: 35
any solution?
It need install the CUDA drivers: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-downloads
-
The reason i am asking is because it can not run on AMAZON EC2 computer with GPU instance.
I tried to run it on amazon ec2 and what i get is the following:
Could not attach to CUDA device 0: 35
any solution?
It need install the CUDA drivers: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-downloads
-
-o is back
-
thanks, now is logged but
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ arCUDAminer (v1.0b) ║
║ author: jh,dga and ported by archit ║
║ http://ypool.net ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Will mine 15 round after 500 to support developerUsing SSE4
Connected to server using x.pushthrough(xpt) protocol
Initializing. Device has 2087968768 free of -2147483648 total bytes of memory
xpt: Logged in with xxxxxxxxx
New block data - height: 42422 tx count: 10
Error in kernel exec (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
Could not memcpy dev_data (30)
nvidia 610M
-
Add compute 3.0 version, should give a performance boost to fermi users
-
Add compute 3.0 version, should give a performance boost to fermi users
i not understand, sorry
-
ahh ok my card is only 2.1
-
680 gtx high perf 780-790
cm3 high perf 800-805
With other CUDA miner have 850+ so I use another. Why with this miner GPU usage is 80 100 80 100, not stable 100%.
-
Hello,
what is arCUDAminer_cm3.exe in arCUDAminer1.0b
best regards
-
680 gtx high perf 780-790
cm3 high perf 800-805
With other CUDA miner have 850+ so I use another. Why with this miner GPU usage is 80 100 80 100, not stable 100%.
Which other CUDA miner? The usage fix is coming soon
_cm3 has been compiled for compute capability 3.0
-
Works on the built in Intel HD 4000 but crashes on a gtx 550 ti
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: BEX64
Application Name: arOpenCLminer.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 52d41b79
Fault Module Name: StackHash_1dc2
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000
Exception Offset: 0000000000000000
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Data: 0000000000000008
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 1dc2
Additional Information 2: 1dc22fb1de37d348f27e54dbb5278e7d
Additional Information 3: cbc5
Additional Information 4: cbc5ec6970b2af35927ad67117ca57e2
-
Works on the built in Intel HD 4000 but crashes on a gtx 550 ti
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: BEX64
Application Name: arOpenCLminer.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 52d41b79
Fault Module Name: StackHash_1dc2
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000
Exception Offset: 0000000000000000
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Data: 0000000000000008
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 1dc2
Additional Information 2: 1dc22fb1de37d348f27e54dbb5278e7d
Additional Information 3: cbc5
Additional Information 4: cbc5ec6970b2af35927ad67117ca57e2
Use the CUDA miner not opencl for Nvidia
-
New update! Runs on processors without AVX or SSE4! Huge performance boost on some cards (One of the testers reported 650 c/m in 1.0b to 840 c/m)
-
only for ypool?
beeeeer/PTSpool/1Gh can't connect...
-
910-920 cpm on 680 gtx, cm3 high perf with avx. Nice, but with another miner have 999-1005.
-
New update! Runs on processors without AVX or SSE4! Huge performance boost on some cards (One of the testers reported 650 c/m in 1.0b to 840 c/m)
Can you do a similar update to your openCL miner to not require AVX or SSE4?
-
New update! Runs on processors without AVX or SSE4! Huge performance boost on some cards (One of the testers reported 650 c/m in 1.0b to 840 c/m)
Can you do a similar update to your openCL miner to not require AVX or SSE4?
Coming soon!
-
Hello
The ratio GPU clock / Memory clock is it important?
-
Nope. Faster VRAM => more cpm. Faster GPU => a bit more cpm.
-
arCUDAminer1.0c is the best :D
Thank you archit
GTX690 = 2150 c/m
(http://img15.hostingpics.net/thumbs/mini_418248IMG3343.jpg) (http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=418248IMG3343.jpg)
GTS450 = 253 c/m
(http://img15.hostingpics.net/thumbs/mini_41443420140119103353.jpg) (http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=41443420140119103353.jpg)
Quadro 2000 = 204 c/m
(http://img15.hostingpics.net/thumbs/mini_42793420140119104733.jpg) (http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=42793420140119104733.jpg)
-
arCUDAminer1.0c is the best :D
Thank you archit
GTX690 = 2150 c/m
(http://img15.hostingpics.net/thumbs/mini_418248IMG3343.jpg) (http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=418248IMG3343.jpg)
GTS450 = 253 c/m
(http://img15.hostingpics.net/thumbs/mini_41443420140119103353.jpg) (http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=41443420140119103353.jpg)
Quadro 2000 = 204 c/m
(http://img15.hostingpics.net/thumbs/mini_42793420140119104733.jpg) (http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=42793420140119104733.jpg)
Glad to know, please post your results in the comparison thread
-
Not for everyone... but very good too.
I want next cpm boost.
-
I am going to release the source code soon!
-
Hello
The ratio GPU clock / Memory clock is it important?
i think it may be better to underclock memory some to raise core higher. if it's a temp/voltage issue
otherwise yeah just raise them both
-
New update with speed upgrade, capability to work on devices with compute 1.1 or greater and low memory version coming soon!
Edit: New update released, upto 20% speed gains on all devices and additional 10 to 15% on cm 3.5 devices
-
1.0d has degraded performance compared to 1.0c on GTX780.
1.0c had around 1700 cpm, 1.0d has around 1300 cpm.
Tried both on GTX 780 + i7 3770K and on GTX 570 + GTX780 + AMD A6 5400.
In both cases performance degradation seems identical.
arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe doesnt run on GTX 570 + GTX780 + AMD A6 5400.
PS: missing cudart64_55.dll in the archive for 1.0d
-
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.
There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.
-
Excuse me, I'd like to get the cm3 version back and try it on my GTX660. Thanks a lot.
-
Thanks for the response it seems I rushed the testing a bit, will revert the change I think is causing this
Edit:Rolled back the change, devices with compute 3.5 still have a speed improvement.
Please test v1.0e if you still want cm3 back no problem
-
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.
There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.
Which miner are we talking about?
-
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.
There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.
Which miner are we talking about?
This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0).
-
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.
There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.
Which miner are we talking about?
This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0).
What does 1.0d give?
-
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.
There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.
Which miner are we talking about?
This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0).
What does 1.0d give?
~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.
Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.
(http://s29.postimg.org/6vc3tcxeb/ar_CUDA1d.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/6vc3tcxeb/)
Below is the other miner.
(http://s22.postimg.org/xy4vi25y5/GTX780.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/xy4vi25y5/)
Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.
(http://s29.postimg.org/fr4yxpbf7/ar_CUDA1_0c.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/fr4yxpbf7/)
-
GTX 780 + i7 3770K
arCUDAminer_highperf - 1.0e performance ~ 1750 1.0c performance ~ 1700
arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf - 1.0e performance ~1350 1.0c performance ~1650
There are some performance fluctuations and my methods of getting results are not very reliable (running the executable for about 2 minutes and looking at the last few cpm reports). However the difference in performance of CM35_highperf is clearly noticable.
-
Please create <1GB version with Compute 3.5. There are GT630 and GT640 that are Kepler based.
-
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.
There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.
Which miner are we talking about?
This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0).
What does 1.0d give?
~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.
Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.
(http://s29.postimg.org/6vc3tcxeb/ar_CUDA1d.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/6vc3tcxeb/)
Below is the other miner.
(http://s22.postimg.org/xy4vi25y5/GTX780.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/xy4vi25y5/)
Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.
(http://s29.postimg.org/fr4yxpbf7/ar_CUDA1_0c.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/fr4yxpbf7/)
Give it at least 45 minutes to stabilize
-
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.
There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.
Which miner are we talking about?
This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0).
What does 1.0d give?
~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.
Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.
(http://s29.postimg.org/6vc3tcxeb/ar_CUDA1d.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/6vc3tcxeb/)
Below is the other miner.
(http://s22.postimg.org/xy4vi25y5/GTX780.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/xy4vi25y5/)
Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.
(http://s29.postimg.org/fr4yxpbf7/ar_CUDA1_0c.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/fr4yxpbf7/)
Give it at least 45 minutes to stabilize
I will do that, but my system traditionally stabilizes within a couple minutes.
I will post my results later tonight.
-
I ran arCUDAminer 1.0d for ~45 minutes and my c/m settled right below 1600. I ran arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe
(http://s28.postimg.org/snrtce521/ar_CUDA1d_45min.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/snrtce521/)
I also ran arCUDAminer 1.0e for 20 minutes, same results. I also ran arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe
(http://s28.postimg.org/3q1xi5el5/ar_CUDA_1_0e_20min.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/3q1xi5el5/)
Normal arCUDAminer.exe on 1.0e gives me the best result from your miner, ~1800 c/m.
(http://s4.postimg.org/b2zqf4zzd/ar_CUDA_1_0e_Norm.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/b2zqf4zzd/)
-
Please create <1GB version with Compute 3.5. There are GT630 and GT640 that are Kepler based.
There is a normal compute 3.5 binary too. Also those having problems with cpm drop in cm35_highperf please try the normal cm35 so I can get this sorted out
-
I have two the same type of card. Will crossfire in a future version add any efficiencies?
Also, are there any performance improvements between version d and version e?
-
I have two the same type of card. Will crossfire in a future version add any efficiencies?
Also, are there any performance improvements between version d and version e?
Revert a change that some people reported to cause slow downs so yet, performance improvements in e over d
-
can i use this with beeeeer?
i had issues getting ypool to work.. got virus alerts
-
can i use this with beeeeer?
i had issues getting ypool to work.. got virus alerts
Nope
-
New update for arCUDAminer with a performance increase for all cards, experimental upgrade for Compute 3.5 cards and Share values in miner coming soon!
-
Your miner doesn't support my GTX690 no matter I set -g 1 or -g 2, only one gpu works under -g 1; or both work on very low cpm under -g 2. Can you fix them cz ptsGPUz supports 690's under its 0.3b version (while supports became badly with newer versions). Looks like both of miners did not optimize for sli or 690/590.
-
Your miner doesn't support my GTX690 no matter I set -g 1 or -g 2, only one gpu works under -g 1; or both work on very low cpm under -g 2. Can you fix them cz ptsGPUz supports 690's under its 0.3b version (while supports became badly with newer versions). Looks like both of miners did not optimize for sli or 690/590.
Make sure that you are not CPU mining as well
-
So, any news on the update?
-
So, any news on the update?
Soon I am a bit busy ATM (Exams and lots of other stuff going on)
-
It seems that I went out of traffic (Looking at you dropbox). New links would be up soon!
-
Hi archit, any new update in term of CUDA performance? AMD is so much faster now. Save CUDA! :'( :'( :'(
-
Hi archit, any new update in term of CUDA performance? AMD is so much faster now. Save CUDA! :'( :'( :'(
Too bust mate, no can do!
Well, maybe some new updates will come that should save CUDA but not in the next week.
I hate you exams
-
Is there any way to make a specific card mine? At the moment I have a pair of 780s in my system as well as a 660. I'd like to run the 660 on its own thread.
-
Is there any way to make a specific card mine? At the moment I have a pair of 780s in my system as well as a 660. I'd like to run the 660 on its own thread.
Soon, not now
-
Ordered a GTX 750 ti. Got accepted into CUDA registered program. Highly optimized kepler+ miner coming soon!
-
Your last "soon" was one month ago. Any updates?
-
Your last "soon" was one month ago. Any updates?
Got caught up in exams followed by a really long holiday. Will begin work on it soon.