0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No rollbacks! The solution is to reduce our dependence on centralized exchanges.
Where did you get that?
Quote from: Ander on February 15, 2015, 04:42:20 pmQuote from: arhag on February 15, 2015, 04:25:17 pmI can't believe how many people there are supporting rollbacks (even if it's targeted rollbacks to a small set of transactions) in this thread. It completely undermines the blockchain.Its not BTS, its their BTC. We should all be okay.Good, let's hope so. But we should still be vigilant. Eventually it will happen to us as long as we keep using centralized exchanges.Light wallets with exchange functionality can't come soon enough. And then we also need decentralized-ish (where counterparty risk is only a subset of the delegates) BTC gateways/bridges.
Quote from: arhag on February 15, 2015, 04:25:17 pmI can't believe how many people there are supporting rollbacks (even if it's targeted rollbacks to a small set of transactions) in this thread. It completely undermines the blockchain.Its not BTS, its their BTC. We should all be okay.
I can't believe how many people there are supporting rollbacks (even if it's targeted rollbacks to a small set of transactions) in this thread. It completely undermines the blockchain.
"Hackers made use of the time we were restocking our hot wallet from cold wallet. They stole all the BTC from the Bter's cold wallet."
Holy shit, really bter? Your cold wallet?Thank god its not BTS. "Withdrawals of the unaffected coins will be arranged later". If they dont get it back they are insolvent. If they pay the 720 bounty and manage to get it back somehow they are probably solvent, like after the NXT hack, but I dont trust them anymore.